background preloader

Atheism

Facebook Twitter

Debating a Christian – The Atheist Handbook. Email by Jeremy L.

Debating a Christian – The Atheist Handbook

Moran, JT Eberhard, Adam Brown, and other contributors Part 1. Opening Statements. Part 2. Part 3. Part 4. Part 5. Part 6: Philosophical Quotes. Credits. This culmination of knowledge is put together in the hopes that both theist, and atheist alike would be able to take something from it & improve upon the human they are. There is no greater debate then that between faith and fact. For the sake of clarification, if & when I state IF god…this, or IF god…that. Memorize some of these to remember when you hear “Religion is good!” For a simple breakdown in 12 arguments against “god”, JT Eberhard gives you: ARGUMENT #1 – Biblical Prophecies / ARGUMENT #2 – Miracles / ARGUMENT #3 – Design / ARGUMENT #4 – Fine-Tuning For a deeper knowledge base, Jeremy Moran gives you a plethora of source (academic and otherwise): Part 3.

Part 4. Part 5. The Cynic's Sanctuary. Christopher Hitchens Online Directory. Why There Is No Theistic God. Beyond Good and Evil. God is in The Neurons. God is in The Neurons submitted by Matt / download it in 720p, 1080p and iPhone formats at Twitter: Facebook: Reese on Twitter: Full soundtrack at (who did the amazing original soundtrack) Related links that can help in understanding God is in The Neurons: (Neuroscience related:) YouTube – Part 4 – Phantoms In The Brain (Episode 1) YouTube – Part 5 – Phantoms In The Brain (Episode 1) Where is consciousness?

God is in The Neurons

Share on Facebook Stumble It Post a comment Thoughts? You must be logged in to post a comment. More Videos Get Inspired – Best Inspirational Quotes J Krishnamurti on Choiceless Awareness and Thought Rob Beats Word Up [3/19/2014] Ji Ben Qi Gong 基本氣功 (Fundamental Exercises) Biology of Belief – by Bruce Lipton (full documentary) Excision, Downlink, Space Laces – Destroid 1. Wizards only, fools. How To Raise Your Vibrations-Powerful Meditation Music to Energise Chakras! Life, the Universe and nothing › Opinion (ABC Science) In Depth › Analysis and Opinion The metaphysical 'rule' that out of nothing nothing comes represents an unwillingness to recognise that nature may be cleverer than philosophers or theologians, argues Lawrence M.

Life, the Universe and nothing › Opinion (ABC Science)

Krauss. The central problem with the notion of creation is that it appears to require some externality, something outside of the system itself to pre-exist, in order to create the conditions necessary for the system to come into being. This is usually where the notion of God — some external agency existing separate from space, time, and indeed from physical reality itself — comes in, because the buck seems to be required to stop somewhere. To simply argue that God can do what nature cannot is to argue that supernatural potential for existence is somehow different from regular natural potential for existence. To posit a god who could resolve this conundrum often is claimed to require that God exists outside the universe and is either timeless or eternal. ^ to top Nothing and something. Hume on Religion. First published Tue Oct 4, 2005; substantive revision Mon Feb 11, 2013 There are many questions in philosophy to which no satisfactory answer has yet been given.

Hume on Religion

But the question of the nature of the gods is the darkest and most difficult of all…. So various and so contradictory are the opinions of the most learned men on this matter as to persuade one of the truth of the saying that philosophy is the child of ignorance…— Cicero, The Nature of the Gods David Hume's various writings concerning problems of religion are among the most important and influential contributions on this topic. In these writings Hume advances a systematic, sceptical critique of the philosophical foundations of various theological systems. The primary aims of this article are: (1) to give an account of Hume's main arguments as they touch on various particular issues relating to religion; and (2) to answer to the question concerning the general character of Hume's commitments on this subject. 1. 2.