background preloader

Noam Chomsky

Facebook Twitter

Investment theory of party competition. Overview[edit] However, this is different from a corporatist system, in which elite interests come together and bargain to create policy.

Investment theory of party competition

In the investment theory, political parties act as the political arms of these business groups and therefore don't typically try to reconcile for policy. Labor-intensive investors[edit] A study by Larry Bartels found a positive correlation between Senate votes and opinions of high income groups similar to the conclusions in the investment theory.[4] Labor-intensive investors made up much of the early political systems in the 18th and 19th centuries. These industries are also heavily against labor unions, since unionization increases the price of their goods. Capital-intensive investors[edit] Due to industrialization and new markets in the 20th century, capital-intensive investors became the new economic order after the realignment of the Great Depression.

Comparison to other election theories[edit] See also[edit] References[edit] The "Virtual Senate" August 31, 2003 The Dominion - CHOMSKY: The term is not mine.

The "Virtual Senate"

I am borrowing it from the professional literature on international economics. The "virtual senate" consists of investors and lenders. They can effectively decide social and economic policy by capital flight, attacks on currency that undermine the economy, and other means that have been provided by the neoliberal framework of the past thirty years. QUESTION: This is a big win for the left in the world; Brazil is such a big country ... CHOMSKY: I have a lot of respect for Lula but the problem is that he has very little space to maneuver.

QUESTION: We hope not... CHOMSKY: Lula could direct resources for internal development but unregulated capital flow can be used very effectively to undermine attempts by individual governments to introduce progressive measures. QUESTION: It seems to me, with a certain degree of difference, that the concept of a virtual senate is similar to Negri's and Hardt's concept of Empire. Noam Chomsky Resources. "As long as the Internet was under control of the Pentagon, it was free.

Noam Chomsky Resources

People could use it freely [for] information sharing. That remained true when it stayed within the state sector of the National Science Foundation. As late as about 1994, people like say, Bill Gates, had no interest in the Internet. He wouldn't even go to conferences about it, because he didn't see a way to make a profit from it. Now it's being handed over to private corporations, and they tell you pretty much what they want to do.

They want to control access, and that's a large part of Microsoft's efforts: control access in such a way that people who access the Internet will be guided to things that *they* want, like home marketing service, or diversion, or something or other. Well, you know, these things don't *have* to happen. Slavoj Žižek Responds to Noam Chomsky: ‘I Don’t Know a Guy Who Was So Often Empirically Wrong’ Earlier this month we posted an excerpt from an interview in which linguist Noam Chomsky slams the Slovenian philosopher and cultural critic Slavoj Žižek, along with the late French theorists Jacques Lacan and Jacques Derrida, for cloaking trivial ideas in obscure and inflated language to make them seem profound.

Slavoj Žižek Responds to Noam Chomsky: ‘I Don’t Know a Guy Who Was So Often Empirically Wrong’

“There’s no ‘theory’ in any of this stuff,” Chomsky says to an interviewer who had asked him about the three continental thinkers, “not in the sense of theory that anyone is familiar with in the sciences or any other serious field. Try to find in all of the work you mentioned some principles from which you can deduce conclusions, empirically testable propositions where it all goes beyond the level of something you can explain in five minutes to a twelve-year-old. See if you can find that when the fancy words are decoded. I can’t. So I’m not interested in that kind of posturing. Chomsky’s remarks sparked a heated debate on Open Culture and elsewhere. Via Partially Examined Life. Noam Chomsky: The Kind of Anarchism I Believe in, and What's Wrong with Libertarians. Noam Chomsky. The Top 100 Books Referenced by Noam Chomsky. Chomsky: “por que tenho esperanças” Diplô - Biblioteca: Livros de Noam Chomsky publicados no Brasil.

Vídeo: Chomsky e Foucault num debate incomum. Chomsky. El objetivo de la educación. Chomsky (2014) "Neo-Liberalism" Is neither "New" nor "Liberal"