Google Transparency Report 8 oct. 2018 Our "Requests for user information" Transparency Report has been updated to include data for the first half of 2018. We received 57,868 government requests for information about 126,581 accounts during the first half of 2018. Visit the report to explore the new data! LIRE LA SUITE arrow_forward 15 août 2018 Earlier this year, we took important steps to increase transparency in political advertising at Google, including new requirements for any advertiser purchasing election ads on Google in the U.S. and a clear “paid for by” disclosure incorporated into any election ad. LIRE LA SUITE arrow_forward 27 juil. 2018 Pursuant to requirements under Germany's NetzDG law, we have added a new section to our Transparency Report that provides data specific to certain types of content removals in Germany for YouTube and Google+. LIRE LA SUITE arrow_forward
Loi Hamon, tout savoir pour être en règle Le web français est régit par un certains nombre de textes légaux qu'il convient de respecter. Car même si nul n'est sensé ignorer la Loi, il faut bien admettre qu'un petit rappel en la matière n'est jamais inutile. En plus des mentions légales et des Conditions Générales de Vente (ou d'utilisation) déjà obligatoires, l'année 2014 a été marquée par l'entrée en vigueur d'une obligation d'information sur les cookies ainsi que d'un renforcement de l'information et de la protection du consommateur avec la Loi Hamon (LOI n° 2014-344 du 17 mars 2014 relative à la consommation). Promulguée en juin dernier, ce texte législatif important apporte de substantielles avancées par rapport à la loi Chatel pour les e-commerçants. La Loi Hamon La Loi Hamon apporte principalement une meilleure protection des achats sur internet avec surtout, un délai de rétraction qui passe de 7 à 14 jours et un remboursement sous 14 jours maximum suivant la décision de rétractation du consommateur. Avant la vente
The real story in the NSA scandal is the collapse of journalism Updated June 9 to include details of the Guardian's coverage, a link to the Post's correction policy, and a quote from the Huffington Post. Updated June 10 to include a quote from a follow-up article in the Post directly contradicting its initial claims and another observation after the release of the leaker's identity. On Thursday, June 6, the Washington Post published a bombshell of a story, alleging that nine giants of the tech industry had "knowingly participated" in a widespread program by the United States National Security Agency (NSA). One day later, with no acknowledgment except for a change in the timestamp, the Post revised the story, backing down from sensational claims it made originally. The primary author of the story, Barton Gellman, is a Pulitzer Prize winner, and the Washington Post has a history in investigative journalism that goes back to Watergate and All the President's Men. This story was part of a busy week for attention-grabbing stories on the topic of U.S.
Muse & Geek - [LEGISLATION] Directive Européenne sur les Cookies Depuis quelques temps, vous avez pu apercevoir sur vos divers sites web préférés un bandeau vous signalant l'utilisation des cookies et vous demandant, de manière plus ou moins tacite, votre consentement pour en déposer sur votre navigateur. Il s'agit en fait d'une obligation légale émise par la Commission Européenne sous la directive 2002/58/EC mise à jour par la directive 2009/136/EC et entrée en vigueur le 25 Mai 2011. L'article 5(3) de cette directive stipule (page 20) que : Les États membres garantissent que le stockage d’informations, ou l’obtention de l’accès à des informations déjà stockées, dans l’équipement terminal d’un abonné ou d’un utilisateur n’est permis qu’à condition que l’abonné ou l’utilisateur ait donné son accord, après avoir reçu, dans le respect de la directive 95/46/CE, une information claire et complète, entre autres sur les finalités du traitement. Consentement, d'accord. Mais avant de faire le tour de l'Europe, qu'est-ce qu'un cookie ?
Années 2010 : prise de conscience collective et adaptation de la régulation européenne - CNIL 40 ans Chargement 40 ans au service des libertés Les données personnelles sont désormais massivement confiées par les citoyens et utilisées par les États et les entreprises dans des usages et services du quotidien. Dans cet univers numérique, la Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL) est le régulateur des données personnelles. 40 ans au service des libertés 40 ans au service des libertés Années 1970-1980 : la vigilance citoyenne face aux gros fichiers de l’Etat L’informatisation des administrations puis des entreprises soulève des débats sur la protection de la vie privée. Années 1970-1980 : la vigilance citoyenne face aux gros fichiers de l’Etat SAFARI : un projet de « mise en fiches » de la population française 23 juil 1972 03:13 Michel Chevalet sur l’interconnexion des fichiers et les enjeux pour les libertés 18 avr 1974 Informatique : un risque pour les libertés individuelles ? Années 1990 : les données, carburant du marketing Close ✓ Allow ✗ Deny ✛ APIs
Legal Help Removing Content From Google This page will help you get to the right place to report content that you would like removed from Google's services under applicable laws. Providing us with complete information will help us investigate your inquiry. If you have non-legal issues that concern Google's Terms of Service or Product Policies, please visit We ask that you submit a separate notice for each Google service where the content appears. What Google product does your request relate to? Which product does your request relate to? What can we help you with? Choose from the following options Are you the copyright owner or authorized to act on his/her behalf? What is the allegedly infringing work in question? The image/video is of yourself I have read the above and wish to proceed Are you the owner of the technological protection measure, the copyright owner of the work protected by this technology, or a representative authorized to act on behalf of either owner? Google Help
Electrospaces.net: What is known about NSA's PRISM program (Updated: August 19, 2016) Therefore, this article presents almost everything we know about the PRISM program, combining information from my earlier postings and from other media and government sources. It shows that PRISM is not about bulk or mass surveillance, but for collecting communications of specifically identified foreign targets. NSA also has no "direct access" to the servers of companies like Microsoft, Facebook and Google - it's actually a unit of the FBI that picks up data related to specific identifiers. In total, ca. 227 million internet communications are collected under the PRISM program each year, contributing to reports about counter-intelligence, terrorism and weapons proliferation. The PRISM presentation Most of what we know about PRISM comes from an internal NSA presentation of 41 slides. Until now, a total of 19 slides have been published and another 4 were incidentally or partially shown on television. 1. General aspects of PRISM 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
Apple, Facebook, others defy authorities, increasingly notify users of secret data demands after Snowden revelations Fueling the shift is the industry’s eagerness to distance itself from the government after last year’s disclosures about National Security Agency surveillance of online services. Apple, Microsoft, Facebook and Google all are updating their policies to expand routine notification of users about government data seizures, unless specifically gagged by a judge or other legal authority, officials at all four companies said. Yahoo announced similar changes in July. As this position becomes uniform across the industry, U.S. tech companies will ignore the instructions stamped on the fronts of subpoenas urging them not to alert subjects about data requests, industry lawyers say. Companies that already routinely notify users have found that investigators often drop data demands to avoid having suspects learn of inquiries. “It serves to chill the unbridled, cost-free collection of data,” said Albert Gidari Jr., a partner at Perkins Coie who represents several technology companies. Ronald T. Ann E.
Faut-il avoir peur du projet de loi renseignement? L'Atelier des médias, c’est, à la fois, une émission de radio et un réseau social à l’écoute de l’innovation, de la société numérique et des révolutions dans le monde des médias. Vous aussi venez découvrir nos histoires, reportages et entretiens et, si vous le souhaitez, vous inscrire : Le travail de Ziad Maalouf, Simon Decreuze et de leur équipe est, chaque semaine, enrichi, stimulé, orienté, aiguillé par vos contributions, vos réactions, vos commentaires, vos suggestions, via la communauté de l'Atelier des médias. Présentation : Ziad Maalouf. Avec la collaboration de Léo Caravagna, Mathilde Saliou et Camille Deloche. Le site de L'Atelier des médias : *** A partir du 3 novembre 2018: le samedi à 13h10 TU vers toutes cibles, vers le monde sauf Afrique à 17h40 TU, vers l'Afrique à 19h10 TU, vers le monde sauf Afrique sauf Paris le lundi à 04h40 TU.
Je n'ai rien à cacher. 90% of security incidents trace back to PEBKAC and ID10T errors “Apparently, hackers really do still party like it’s 1999,” Verizon said in its 2015 Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) regarding how often really old vulnerabilities are exploited and result in data breaches. But the real problem is you. It’s me. It’s each and every one of us as the breakdown of security incidents in 2014 revealed that the “common denominator—accounting for nearly 90% of all incidents—is people.” Oldies are still goodies as the Verizon team added: Whether it’s goofing up, getting infected, behaving badly, or losing stuff, most incidents fall in the PEBKAC and ID-10T über-patterns. When it comes to phishing attacks, the Verizon team found that 23% of users open phishing emails and 11% take the extra PEBKAC step of actually clicking on the attachment. Don’t forget to patch old vulnerabilities According to the report, “99.9% of the exploited vulnerabilities had been compromised more than a year after the associated CVE was published.” Breach cost per record
Online Privacy FAQ Copyright © 2007 - 2014Privacy Rights Clearinghouse This FAQ is an addendum to our Fact Sheet 18 on Internet privacy.www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs18-cyb.htm It provides answers to questions that we are often asked by individuals who contact us concerning online privacy and safety. 1. I have found my name and personal information on the Internet at sites like ZabaSearch and Intelius. I am worried about identity theft. How can I get my information removed from all of these sites? There is no one simple way to have your information entirely removed from all of the information broker sites. Once your personal information has been recorded in public records, there is no effective way to permanently or completely remove it (for example, birth certificate, marriage license, home ownership documents, court records, and in some states voter registration, etc.). As part of the request for removal, the information broker Web site may ask you for personal information to “verify” your identity. 2. 3.