background preloader

How do japanese multiply??

How do japanese multiply??

Four color theorem Example of a four-colored map A four-coloring of a map of the states of the United States (ignoring lakes). In mathematics, the four color theorem, or the four color map theorem, states that, given any separation of a plane into contiguous regions, producing a figure called a map, no more than four colors are required to color the regions of the map so that no two adjacent regions have the same color. Two regions are called adjacent if they share a common boundary that is not a corner, where corners are the points shared by three or more regions.[1] For example, in the map of the United States of America, Utah and Arizona are adjacent, but Utah and New Mexico, which only share a point that also belongs to Arizona and Colorado, are not. Despite the motivation from coloring political maps of countries, the theorem is not of particular interest to mapmakers. The four color theorem was proven in 1976 by Kenneth Appel and Wolfgang Haken. Precise formulation of the theorem[edit] History[edit]

Holiday Fat Hack: How to Eat Like a Santa and Not Turn Into One Chaos theory A double rod pendulum animation showing chaotic behavior. Starting the pendulum from a slightly different initial condition would result in a completely different trajectory. The double rod pendulum is one of the simplest dynamical systems that has chaotic solutions. Chaos: When the present determines the future, but the approximate present does not approximately determine the future. Chaotic behavior can be observed in many natural systems, such as weather and climate.[6][7] This behavior can be studied through analysis of a chaotic mathematical model, or through analytical techniques such as recurrence plots and Poincaré maps. Introduction[edit] Chaos theory concerns deterministic systems whose behavior can in principle be predicted. Chaotic dynamics[edit] The map defined by x → 4 x (1 – x) and y → x + y mod 1 displays sensitivity to initial conditions. In common usage, "chaos" means "a state of disorder".[9] However, in chaos theory, the term is defined more precisely. where , and , is: .

A mathematical bug shows us why the 3D universe leads to Murphy's Law Let's also not forget that unlike, a path, the movement of any string no matter how thin is at least partially governed by the slight recoiling that occurs at the bends and curves. I think analogies are wonderful for explaining complex systems to simple folk like myself, but I hate it when "scientists" try to prove a mathematical system with an insufficient metaphor. Exactly what I was thinking. The way a string falls is not random. Even if you stood there shaking the box it still has all manner of constraints based on where parts of the string both forward and backward from each position are. Like if you have a spiral, and you imagine this bugs walk is from the top spiralling down, this bug cannot actually walk directly downwards because another part of the spiral is already there, no matter how much you try to randomise it with shaking.

Stop Firefox from Automatically Entering "Work Offline" Mode href="#c5714707">Entonces loves BACON: Yes, but mathematically speaking, it's NOT. That's jut the spin, and you can choose either one, but any Hillary responds: 1. Even WITH Florida and Michigan included, he is still ahead in the popular vote. 2. What swing states are you referring to? Also, recall that a lot of Clinton's big wins were early in the election. 3. Actually, they indicate the level of organization in a candidate's campaign. Frankly, if none of things were true, I'd be like, whatever, he's not my guy, but he's obviously a really viable candidate so, get on board. But they aren't true. Instead, what I know is he's a very, very week candidate in the GE on swing states that have been a problem for us, and I just hope that he can turn VA. You also have to remember that democratic primary =/= general election.

Mindfuck Math A mathematical bug shows us why the 3D universe carries the possibility of despair. Really. For N bug-steps, there are two things to consider: how many total possible paths of N steps the bug has available to it, and how many of those N-step paths lead home. For example, let's look at 1D. After just 2 steps (N=2), where the bug could only go left or right each step, the bug has had 4 possible paths available to it: LR - Home RL - Home Of those, 2 lead home, giving it a home-probability of 50% after 2 steps. Now let's look at 4 steps (still in 1D). LLRR - Home LRLL - Home (earlier) LRLR - Home (twice) LRRL - Home (twice) LRRR - Home (earlier) RLLL - Home (earlier) RLLR - Home (twice) RLRL - Home (twice) RLRR - Home (earlier) RRLL - Home Out of 16 possible 4-step paths, 10 of them led back home. Now let's look at 2D, where the bug has 4 choices each step: up, down, left, or right. 4 steps leaves the bug with 256 possible paths, 84 of which lead home at either 2 or 4 steps. That's why the bug isn't guaranteed to make it back in 3D.

10 Terrific PC Accessories Uncovering Da Vinci's Rule of the Trees As trees shed their foliage this fall, they reveal a mysterious, nearly universal growth pattern first observed by Leonardo da Vinci 500 years ago: a simple yet startling relationship that always holds between the size of a tree's trunk and sizes of its branches. A new paper has reignited the debate over why trees grow this way, asserting that they may be protecting themselves from wind damage. "Leonardo's rule is an amazing thing," said Kate McCulloh of Oregon State University, a scientist specializing in plant physiology. "Until recently, people really haven't tested it." Da Vinci wrote in his notebook that "all the branches of a tree at every stage of its height when put together are equal in thickness to the trunk." To investigate why this rule may exist, physicist Christophe Eloy, from the University of Provence in France, designed trees with intricate branching patterns on a computer. Once the skeleton was completed, Eloy put it to the test in a virtual wind tunnel.

How to Get Things Done on an Airplane I've got my own 360 collection going right now, the only difference between me and this guy is, I refuse to buy total shit I'll never enjoy. Except Two Worlds and Perfect Dark Zero, only cause I found em for under 9 bucks. I've got just about every single 360 game that stands at an average critics review score of around 7ish or higher. 56 Xbox 360 Games 23 Original Xbox Games 28 Arcade Titles Some of my games like Blazing Angels 1/2 may not be at that minimum of 7 or higher, but I like them anyways. I dont have a single game in my collection that is a Plantium Hit, either. One of the very, very few perks of working at a Gamestop. For example, The Darkness fell to 9 bucks two weeks ago used. And the tiny employee discount I get on the points cards for live games doesnt hurt, either. My collection has thus far probably cost me around a grand, and was started last September, when I got my 360.

The nature of nothingness Zilch… Naught… Nada… It’s easy to dismiss the concept of nothing as, well, nothing. In fact, nothing is everything to science – understanding the intangible voids has lead to breakthroughs we could never have imagined possible. Read on to find out why nothing is more important than nothing… Nothingness: Zero, the number they tried to ban Every schoolchild knows the concept of zero – so why did it take so long to catch on? Follow its convoluted path from heresy to common sense Read more: "The nature of nothingness" I USED to have seven goats. This is not a trick question. This is a tangled story of two zeroes: zero as a symbol to represent nothing, and zero as a number that can be used in calculations and has its own mathematical properties. Zero the symbol was in fact the first of the two to pop up by a long chalk. It is through such machinations that the string of digits "2012" comes to have the properties of a number with the value equal to 2 × 103 + 0 × 102 + 1 × 101 + 2.

Top 10 MindManager Features You Didn’t Know About | The Mindjet Blog There’s an 80/20 rule for software. 80% of people will use or get value from 20% of the features. Given that, what if you flipped the equation around and asked, what 20% more could I do or learn to be 80% more effective? Yesterday, I received a note from a visual mapping enthusiasts at Proctor & Gamble, Adam Siemiginowski. Go ahead, take a look. I challenge you to pick out two of these power features to add to your mapping repertoire… Practice using the feature for a couple of weeks and let us know how it worked for you! Note: Adam uses both MindManager 8 for Windows and Mindjet Catalyst. 1. Work with your team! 2. Capture a steady stream of new ideas and possibilities… then categorize, sort, and modify them for your final output. 3. Trying to share your map with someone who doesn’t have MindManager? 4. No more need to send large attachments! 5. Mark specific nodes in your map… enable categorization of your content. 6. Filter by specific text markers, resources, and icons. 7. 8. 9. 10. Related

Related: