Kurt Goldstein Kurt Goldstein (November 6, 1878 – September 19, 1965) was a German neurologist and psychiatrist who created a holistic theory of the organism. Educated in medicine, Goldstein studied under Carl Wernicke and Ludwig Edinger where he focused on neurology and psychiatry.[1] His clinical work inspired the establishment of The Institute for Research into the Consequences of Brain Injuries. As a Jew, Goldstein was forced to leave Germany when Hitler came to power.[2] After being displaced, Goldstein wrote The Organism (1934). Background[edit] Early life[edit] Goldstein was born into an agnostic Jewish family of nine children. Academic career[edit] After a short period working at the business, Goldstein's father acquiesced and allowed him to enroll at Breslau University. In 1926 Fritz Perls became Goldstein's assistant for a year. Professional career[edit] Between 1906 and 1914, Goldstein worked in a psychiatric clinic in Königsberg. Holistic approach[edit] Methodology[edit] Schizophrenia[edit]
Shadow Work: 5 Ways to Use Carl Jung's Technique to Heal - Learning Mind Shadow work is recognizing and understanding the dark side of our personality. It was coined by Carl Jung and is essential to leading a fulfilling life. Many years ago, a couple I knew well and loved dearly had a baby. It goes without saying that I was really happy for them. I went to see them and they told me the name they’d chosen for their child. They had taken the first three letters of both of their first names to make the new name for their baby. They said that they had combined their love to make a baby, so when it came to naming her, they felt they should combine their names too. Carl Jung and Shadow Work We all think that we know ourselves pretty well. However, what if I told you there are parts of your personality that you despise so much so you hide them away? “How can I be substantial if I do not cast a shadow? Carl Jung is responsible for identifying the ‘shadow’ in our personality. What Is Shadow Work? In order to live a balanced life, we have to acknowledge the shadow. 1.
Self-control In behavior analysis[edit] Another view is that self-control represents the locus of two conflicting contingencies of reinforcement, which then make a controlling response reinforcing when it causes changes in the controlled response.[2][3] Research[edit] Counteractive[edit] Desire is an affectively charged motivation toward a certain object, person, or activity that is associated with pleasure or relief from displeasure.[4] Desires vary in strength and duration. A desire becomes a temptation, entering the area of self-control, if the behavior resulting from the desire conflicts with an individual’s values or other self-regulatory goals.[5][6] A limitation to research on desire is the issue of individuals desiring different things. Desires that conflict with overarching goals or values are known as temptations.[6][8] Self-control dilemmas occur when long-term goals and values clash with short-term temptations. Satiation[edit] Construal levels[edit] Human and non-human[edit] B.F. Drugs[edit]
Karen Horney - Vikipedi Karen Horney (16 Eylül 1885, Hamburg - 4 Aralık 1952, New York), Alman kökenli Amerikalı psikanalist. Neo-Freud’yen bir ekolün “ego psikolojisinin” temsilcisi olmuştur (Okuma günlükleri: çağımızın nevrotik kişiliği, 2011).[1] Freud'dan farklı olarak kişiliğin ve nevrozun oluşumunda biyolojinin ve dürtüsel güçlerin etkilerinden çok kültürel etmenler üzerinde durur. Yaşamı[değiştir | kaynağı değiştir] Babası, dindar ve katı mizaçlı erkeklerin kadınlara göre üstün olduğunu düşünen Norveçli bir gemi kaptanı idi. Mesleği sebebiyle karşılaştığı farklı kültürleri Karen’a anlatırdı ve bunun Karen üzerinde ileride büyük etkisi olacaktı. İnsan ve nevroz[değiştir | kaynağı değiştir] Temel anksiyete çocukluk çağında ebeveyn-çocuk ilikiksinden kaynaklanır (Schultz, 2007, böl. 14).[2] Horney’e göre bir çocuğun çevresindeki insanların, çocuğu sevemeyecek, onun da kendi başına bir birey olamayacağını kabulm edemeyecek kadar kendi nevrozlarına kapıldıkları gerçeğiyle karşılaşırız. 1.Üretkensizlik
Your Life Is Not Limited To One Path By Joe Martino Source: Collective Evolution It is no secret that life can sometimes feel like a limited paved road laid out before us that we feel the need to stick to. What is happening is we are observing and creating an idea of how life should be; the best way to play the game. How many times have we heard “That’s not the best decision” or “That’s not the best decision for the whole family.” We Get Trapped in Belief Systems In either case, both scenarios have one thing in common, a belief system of what the “best” choice or decision is. Let’s take the example of a child coming out of high school today. 9 times out of 10, that child will be told, and may even believe, that the “best” decision they can make for their life is to continue their education at university or college. Next, they would be told to get a job so they can buy a house, as owning and buying a house is a smart decision. The Deep Truth Here is the absolute truth, ready? Look at our world. Even Deeper Like this:
Rubicon model From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In psychological theories of motivation, the Rubicon model, more completely the Rubicon model of action phases, makes a distinction between motivational and volitional processes. The Rubicon model "defines clear boundaries between motivational and action phases." The name "Rubicon model" derives from the tale of Caesar's crossing the Rubicon River, a point of no return, thereby revealing his intentions. "Once subjects move from planning and goal-setting to the implementation of plans, they cross a metaphorical Rubicon. — Lyn Corno, The best laid plans, p. 15 (quoted by Rauber) The Rubicon model addresses four questions, as identified by Achtziger and Gollwitzer:[3] How do people select their goals? The study of these issues is undertaken by both the fields of cognitive neuroscience and social psychology. Background[edit] See also[edit] References[edit]
Parataxical Integration First used by Irish-American psychoanalytic psychiatrist Harry Stack Sullivan in the 1940s, Parataxical Integration (a combination of terms) refers to the mutual condition of parataxic distortions (another concept of Sullivan’s). Parataxical integration exists when two people, usually intimate with each other (i.e. parents and children, spouses, romantic partners, business associates), are reciprocally reactive to each other’s seductions, judgmental inaccuracies, hostile comments, and manipulations or other "triggering" behaviors. One says or does something causing the other to react, setting off a cyclical "ping-pong", "tit-for-tat", "you-get-me-and-I-get-you-back" oscillation of verbal and/or behavioral reactions. Development[edit] The concept first appeared in Sullivan's The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry, published in 1953. Usage[edit] Sources[edit] L.
How to Release Anger: 11 Tips for Letting Go Share on Pinterest Waiting in long lines, dealing with snide remarks from co-workers, driving through endless traffic — it can all become a bit much. While feeling angry by these daily annoyances is a normal response to stress, spending all your time being upset can become destructive. It’s no secret that letting anger simmer or having rage outbursts hurts your personal and professional relationships. But it also impacts your well-being. The good news is that you can learn to manage and channel your anger constructively. In the heat of the moment, it’s easy to overlook your breathing. To combat this, try taking slow, controlled breaths you inhale from your belly rather than your chest. You can also keep this breathing exercise in your back pocket: Repeating a calming phrase can make it easier to express difficult emotions, including anger and frustration. Try slowly repeating, “Take it easy,” or “Everything’s going to be okay,” the next time you’re feeling overwhelmed by a situation.
Self-efficacy Self-efficacy is the extent or strength of one's belief in one's own ability to complete tasks and reach goals.[1] Psychologists have studied self-efficacy from several perspectives, noting various paths in the development of self-efficacy; the dynamics of self-efficacy, and lack thereof, in many different settings; interactions between self-efficacy and self-concept; and habits of attribution that contribute to, or detract from, self-efficacy. This can be seen as the ability to persist and a person's ability to succeed with a task. As an example, self-efficacy directly relates to how long someone will stick to a workout regimen or a diet. High and low self-efficacy determine whether or not someone will choose to take on a challenging task or "write it off" as impossible. Self-efficacy affects every area of human endeavor. Theoretical approaches[edit] Social cognitive theory[edit] Social learning theory[edit] Self-concept theory[edit] Main article: Self-concept Attribution theory[edit] 1. 2.