background preloader

Harvard University says it can't afford journal publishers' prices

Harvard University says it can't afford journal publishers' prices
A memo from Harvard's faculty advisory council said major scientific publishers had made scholarly communication 'fiscally unsustainable'. Photograph: Corbis Exasperated by rising subscription costs charged by academic publishers, Harvard University has encouraged its faculty members to make their research freely available through open access journals and to resign from publications that keep articles behind paywalls. A memo from Harvard Library to the university's 2,100 teaching and research staff called for action after warning it could no longer afford the price hikes imposed by many large journal publishers, which bill the library around $3.5m a year. The extraordinary move thrusts one of the world's wealthiest and most prestigious institutions into the centre of an increasingly fraught debate over access to the results of academic research, much of which is funded by the taxpayer. "We do not believe that the facts in the letter which relate to price increases pertain to Elsevier.

Related:  the bittersweet world of science publishing

Mighty molten powder researchers publish paper in journal twice, months apart A group of French researchers liked their paper on the properties of molten tin so much they published it twice. In the same journal. Four months apart. The Two-Click Rule / nForm / Blog Over the past few years we’ve noticed a pattern on the corporate websites we’ve worked on: Most of the visitors enter through search or referrals. By most I mean 80% to 90%.Most visitors will see three or fewer pages. In other words, they will click (or tap) twice.Less than 10% of visitors will see the home page, and fewer will start there. We’ve started calling this the two-click (or tap) rule: Most people will enter in the middle of your site, click (or tap) twice, then leave.

Math paper retracted because it “contains no scientific content” Have a seat, this one’s a howler. According to a retraction notice for “Computer application in mathematics,” published in Computers & Mathematics with Applications: This article has been retracted at the request of the Publisher, as the article contains no scientific content and was accepted because of an administrative error. Apologies are offered to readers of the journal that this was not detected during the submission process.

Three Things Students Can Do Now to Promote Open Access The open access movement is a long-standing campaign in the world of research to make scholarly works freely available and reusable. One of its fundamental premises is that the progress of knowledge and culture happens scholarly works of all kinds are widely shared, not hidden in ivory towers built with paywalls and shorn by harsh legal regimes. Scholarly journal publishers currently compile research done by professors (for free), send articles out to be peer reviewed (for free), and distribute the edited journals back to universities around the world (for costs anywhere up to $35,000 each). Subscription prices have outpaced inflation by over 250 percent in the past 30 years, and these fees go straight to the publisher.

Motor City movies take film world by storm Editor’s advisory: Some of the movies and trailers linked in this story contain serious themes and adult language. “Our School” in particular is notable for several instances of profanity. Today, filmgoers in New York City will be able to see "Burn," a movie about Detroit firefighters, when it debuts at the Tribeca Film Festival. It's a documentary that has been getting attention across the country. But as a Detroit-themed work, it's far from alone. Copyright licensing is not yet fully fit for purpose for the digital age - the UK could do better still Richard Hooper today published his diagnostic report on how fit for purpose is copyright licensing for the digital age. This is the first phase of the Digital Copyright Exchange Feasibility Study. Today’s report concludes that relative to other countries in the world the UK’s copyright licensing processes compare well.

Citation Cartel Journals Denied 2011 Impact Factor Time out, in the corner by Ken Wilcox via. Flickr Thomson Reuters released the 2011 edition of the Journal Citation Report (JCR) on Thursday, promoting increased coverage of regional journals and listing 526 new journals receiving their first journal impact factor. Showing off gun rights triggers disapproval in Birmingham Sean M. Combs, 18, says he's "100 percent sure" he was acting legally when he strolled on Old Woodward Avenue in downtown Birmingham earlier this month with his M-1 rifle strapped to his back, muzzle to the sky. What's unsettling is that Combs is right about what the law says and doesn't say. He was arrested April 13 on three misdemeanor charges — for brandishing a weapon, resisting and obstructing police, and disturbing the peace — each punishable by up to 93 days in jail. But no matter how the case turns out, the Troy High School senior is making his incendiary point.

A first? Papers retracted for citation manipulation In what appears to be a first, two papers have been retracted for including citations designed to help another journal improve its impact factor rankings. The articles in The Scientific World Journal cited papers in Cell Transplantation, which in turn appears to have cited to a high degree other journals with shared board members. Here’s publisher Hindawi’s statement on the matter, which involved their publication The Scientific World Journal: Statement Regarding Two Cases of Citation ManipulationIt has been brought to the attention of The Scientific World Journal that two articles which were previously published in the journal (“A Showcase of Bench-to-Bedside Regenerative Medicine at the 2010 ASNTR” and “Regenerative Medicine for Neurological Disorders”) included a large number of references whose primary purpose was to manipulate the citation record. Hindawi publisher Paul Peters left this comment on both blog posts: Update, 5:30 p.m.

"That's Why You Don't Have Any Friends." Yesterday, I was at the gym. ...Don't worry. This isn't a gym story. Viewpoint: The spectre of plagiarism haunting Europe 24 July 2012Last updated at 20:18 ET By Debora Weber-Wulff Professor of Media and Computing, University of Applied Sciences, Berlin Bucharest university says it cannot withdraw the PM's PhD without education ministry approval A spectre is haunting Europe, and this time it is the spectre of plagiarism and scientific misconduct. Some high-profile politicians have had to resign in the last 18 months - but the revelations are also shaking respected European universities. Many European countries, especially Germany, have long considered it unnecessary to give plagiarism more than a cursory look. One trusts in the self-cleansing powers of science, end of story.

7 Commonly Corrected Grammar Errors (That Aren't Mistakes) If you've written anything on the Internet in the past 20 years or so, whether on a forum, a comment thread or the Denny's corporate blog you maintain, a short time later you've probably experienced a feeling of pure, unalloyed irritation when you observed someone correcting your grammar. Aside from the fact that everyone on the Internet is irritating all the time, this particular irritation is compounded by the fact that, dammit, they're kind of right. It's an actual mistake you made, making your hot, burning indignation unjustifiable, a terribly frustrating feeling.

For shame! Nature shills for traditional Chinese medicine : Respectful Insolence Nature is one of the oldest and most respected scientific journals around. It’s been around since 1869 and is said to be the world’s most cited journal. What makes Nature unusual these days is that it’s a general science journal. Relations of benefit description [from] A clear explanation of the relations of benefit By Reuben McNew [ENTp] In relations of benefit there are two parties: the weakest being the benefactor, who urgently seeks to indulge in whatever the beneficiary has to offer him. And the beneficiary, the strongest member of the party upon which the Benefactor draws functional energy. In this regards, relationships of benefit could be considered mutual to parasitic, depending upon the emphasis the partners place on the relationship. Usually partners in relations of benefit can form good friendships and remain on good terms with one another, so long as the relationship remains casual and non-serious; trouble usually only begins when the beneficiary invest time, energy, and risks emotional rejection in result of the interest of the benefactor. In essence, the benefactor is the taker of the relationship.