Business Process Modeling Notation Mini-Learning Guide BPMN provides a vocabulary for drawing business processes similar to a flow chart. It was developed by the Business Process Management Initiative, which is now part of the Object Management Group. It has been gaining a lot of traction in business circles over the last couple of years because it provides a language for business people to model what is going on in their business, or to communicate how they want it to operate to systems architects and programmers. BPMN does not provide any means to directly create applications on top of the model. This guide provides links to background information to help you understand BPMN and various articles to help understand the context in which BPMN is being used. BPMN Organizations Object Management Group/Business Process Management Initiative The official BPMN site maintained by the Object Management Group. BPMN Forum This Web community dedicated to BPMN includes modeling tools, specifications, training, publications, and mailing lists.
The Umple Language UmpleOnline Manual News+Code Download Model-Oriented Programming - Umple.org Umple is a modeling tool and programming language family to enable what we call Model-Oriented Programming. It adds abstractions such as Associations, Attributes and State Machines derived from UML to object-oriented programming languages such as Java, C++, PHP and Ruby. Umple can also be used to create UML class and state diagrams textually. Umple is an open source project, so details will evolve. Umple has also been found to help students learn UML faster in the classroom. Umple works online, as an Eclipse plugin, and as a stand-alone command-line Jar. Example The following example shows how to declare attributes and associations in the first steps when modeling a system using Umple. class Student {} class CourseSection {} class Registration { String grade; * -- 1 Student; * -- 1 CourseSection; } class Student {} class CourseSection {} class Registration { String grade; * -- 1 Student; * -- 1 CourseSection; }
Is the BPMN/BPEL Debate a Dead Horse? « Go Flow Bruce Silver’s latest post “Reframing the BPMN vs BPEL Debate” calls to question whether it is worth continued discussion of the definition of BPM. Like most of Bruce’s posts, it is insightful and well worth reading. This is in response to a post by Boris Lublinsky on “BPEL: Who Needs It Anyway? I am a little surprised by Bruce’s response, knowing how Bruce has struggled with educating people on BPM technology. Indeed, that was the point of my original post on ” BPM is not Software Engineering“. Bruce goes on to a hypothetical standard that combines BPMN and BPEL. While that addresses one very important concern, I would still have concerns with the BPMNEL approach. It is almost unfair to talk about this, because BPEL was never design for run-time modification of processes. Run-time modification of a process is not something you can add to a language through an extension: it must be designed to support this from the beginning. I can understand being suspicious of motives. Like this:
Book by Lethbridge and Laganiere on Object-oriented Software Engineering Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Practical Software Development using UML and Java Second Edition Timothy C. Lethbridge and Robert Laganière McGraw Hill, 2001 ISBN 0-07-710908-2 (in the UK, Canada and most of the world)ISBN 0-07-709761-0 (first edition - now superceded) ISBN 0-07-283495-1 (first edition in the USA) A textbook for people who know the basics of object-oriented programming and want to learn the basic principles of software engineering, including how to develop large systems using UML. Covers requirements, modelling, patterns, design, architecture, testing and basic project management. Focuses on concepts such as reuse, quality, iterative development, and risk management.
Network Blogs Choose end event types wisely! The process composer palette offers as many as three types of end events, conclusively named End, Termination, and Error End. We sometimes observe uncertainties in which one to choose for a particular scenario. While the three types of end events all end a control flow branch, they substantially differ in their behavior. (Regular) end events complete a single control flow branch and, thus, consume a single "token" from their inbound edges. At a first glance, differences between regular and terminating end events may appear to be subtle at best. As we have discussed before, this flow will ultimately run into a deadlock if the boundary event attached to "Activity 2" is triggered. If the regular end event is simply replaced by a terminating end, the flow will be completed despite of "dangling" upstream tokens. Then again, there are situations where terminating end events may lead to a non-deterministic behavior.
Acceleo About Acceleo Acceleo is a pragmatic implementation of the Object Management Group (OMG) MOF Model to Text Language (MTL) standard. You do not need to be an expert to start using the plug-ins and create your first code generator : using the provided example projects and the powerful completion feature of the Acceleo editor, it is very easy to get started and understand the basic principles. Acceleo is the result of several man-years of R&D started in the French company Obeo. From Acceleo.org to Eclipse.org The Acceleo project was started 4 years ago. The reference implementation we provide within the Eclipse M2T project, Acceleo 3, combines nice tooling, simple syntax and efficient code generation with all the pragmatism we had with the 2.x stream. User Experience
BPMN - Why and how of Signal Thanks to Rick Geneva , I do not have to describe 'What' a Signal Intermediate Event is used for in a business process. He has provided the use cases for this useful element of BPMN. I responded quickly - now all we need is standard implementations in products like Intalio, pointing out the lack of implementation of signal in tools that support BPMN through to an executable. Of course, we can work around any lack of implementation of signal within a BPMS toolset but the meaning behind signal is not like anything else so a real implementation or common patterns of workaround would help. You can draw the signal event in Intalio so at least the business process designer can start with a proper description of the use case even if the level-3 technical implementation diagram will differ in shape. The BPMN specification saysA signal is a generic, simple form of communication Signalling within pools Without signal, the workaround is to use a message via another pool like this ... Across Diagrams
Business process management, BPM, workflow automation software | bizagi BPMS Bizagi Process Templates Bizagi process templates are ready to use and executable processes that you can use to boost performance in your organization. Feel free to customize them to your particular needs. Before getting started, learn how to install Bizagi templates in your PC. Read the instructions > Purchase request This process handles the whole purchase process: purchase request, approval (approval limits), quotations, supplier selection, purchase order, invoice control. Accounts Payable The Accounts Payable process covers the various tasks involved in the invoices reception, their validation and approval, reducing process time and avoiding incorrect information. Vacation leave request This process handles vacation leave requests and approvals for employees. Travel request / Expense report This process handles travel requests (flight, hotel, cash advance) and approvals for employees. Personal Loans Request Help Desk Vehicle Insurance Policy Underwriting Six sigma project management Onboarding