background preloader

Free will debate: What does free will mean and how did it evolve?

Free will debate: What does free will mean and how did it evolve?
Illustration by Alex Eben Meyer It has become fashionable to say that people have no free will. Many scientists cannot imagine how the idea of free will could be reconciled with the laws of physics and chemistry. Brain researchers say that the brain is just a bunch of nerve cells that fire as a direct result of chemical and electrical events, with no room for free will. Scientists take delight in (and advance their careers by) claiming to have disproved conventional wisdom, and so bashing free will is appealing. Arguments about free will are mostly semantic arguments about definitions. These arguments leave untouched the meaning of free will that most people understand, which is consciously making choices about what to do in the absence of external coercion, and accepting responsibility for one’s actions. There is no need to insist that free will is some kind of magical violation of causality. Different sciences discover different kinds of causes. Does it deserve to be called free? Related:  Wind of Freedom 2016Fall 2013--Wind of FreedomWE

Genesis, from The holy Bible, King James version Bible, King James. Genesis, from The holy Bible, King James version Electronic Text Center, University of Virginia Library | The entire work (255 KB) | Table of Contents for this work | | All on-line databases | Etext Center Homepage | Is Free Will an Illusion? - The Chronicle Review Free will has long been a fraught concept among philosophers and theologians. Now neuroscience is entering the fray. For centuries, the idea that we are the authors of our own actions, beliefs, and desires has remained central to our sense of self. We choose whom to love, what thoughts to think, which impulses to resist. Neuroscience suggests something else. What's at stake? The Chronicle Review brought together some key thinkers to discuss what science can and cannot tell us about free will, and where our conclusions might take us.

Unaware Person Recognition From the Body When Face Identification Fails Alice J. O’Toole, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, GR4.1, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080 E-mail: otoole@utdallas.edu Author Contributions All authors designed the experiments. A. Abstract How does one recognize a person when face identification fails? Article Notes Declaration of Conflicting Interests The authors declared that they had no conflicts of interest with respect to their authorship or the publication of this article. You Call this Progress? One of the prevailing narratives of our time is that we are innovating our way into the future at break-neck speed. It’s just dizzying how quickly the world around us is changing. Technology is this juggernaut that gets ever bigger, ever faster, and all we need to do is hold on for the wild ride into the infinitely cool. Problems get solved faster than we can blink. But I’m going to claim that this is an old, outdated narrative. I think we have a tendency to latch onto a story of humanity that we find appealing or flattering, and stick with it long past its expiration date. The (slightly overstated) claim is that no major new inventions have come to bear in my 45-year lifespan. A Tale of Three Times Before diving into the defense of my bold claim, let’s set the stage with a thought experiment about three equally-separated times, centered around 1950. Take a moment to let that soak in, and listen for any cognitive dissonance popping inside your brain. Space Leaps In My Life Medically? Energy

Genesis — introduction Genesis is the first book of the Pentateuch (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy), the first section of the Jewish and the Christian Scriptures. Its title in English, “Genesis,” comes from the Greek of Gn 2:4, literally, “the book of the generation (genesis) of the heavens and earth.” Its title in the Jewish Scriptures is the opening Hebrew word, Bereshit, “in the beginning.” The book has two major sections—the creation and expansion of the human race (2:4–11:9), and the story of Abraham and his descendants (11:10–50:26). The Composition of the Book. Genesis 1–11. How should modern readers interpret the creation-flood story in Gn 2–11? Genesis 11–50. The historicity of the ancestral stories has been much discussed. Gn 25:19–35:43 are about Jacob and his twelve sons. The last cycle of ancestor stories is about Jacob’s son Joseph (37:1–50:26, though in chaps. 48–49 the focus swings back to Jacob). Genesis in Later Biblical Books. Preamble.

Free will : Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online ‘Free will’ is the conventional name of a topic that is best discussed without reference to the will. Its central questions are ‘What is it to act (or choose) freely?’, and ‘What is it to be morally responsible for one’s actions (or choices)?’ These two questions are closely connected, for freedom of action is necessary for moral responsibility, even if it is not sufficient. Philosophers give very different answers to these questions, hence also to two more specific questions about ourselves: (1) Are we free agents? Incompatibilists hold that freedom is not compatible with determinism. The incompatibilists have a good point, and may be divided into two groups. The second group of incompatibilists is less sanguine. Suitably developed, this argument against moral responsibility seems very strong.

Emotional Processing of Personally Familiar Faces in the Vegetative State Background The Vegetative State (VS) is a severe disorder of consciousness in which patients are awake but display no signs of awareness. Yet, recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have demonstrated evidence for covert awareness in VS patients by recording specific brain activations during a cognitive task. However, the possible existence of incommunicable subjective emotional experiences in VS patients remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to probe the question of whether VS patients retain a brain ability to selectively process external stimuli according to their emotional value and look for evidence of covert emotional awareness in patients. Methods and Findings In order to explore these questions we employed the emotive impact of observing personally familiar faces, known to provoke specific perceptual as well as emotional brain activations. Conclusions Figures Editor: Maurice Ptito, University of Montreal, Canada Copyright: © 2013 Sharon et al. Introduction

Thirty Theses What are these? We all have basic assumptions about the world, human nature, and the relationship between the two. We are taught certain perspectives as children, and this recieved wisdom forms the common ground for communication. Ultimately, when we see the whole picture, our major disagreements are squabbles over details. Should gays be allowed to marry? We assume here a common understanding of what “marriage” means. What happens when the disagreement occurs at an even more basic level? The case is complex, but in truth no more complex than our “common ground” of unexamined, recieved wisdom. There have been several failed attempts at this, the most recent being “The Anthropik Canon.” You are also watching the writing of an “open source” book in real time. Jason Godesky Technoshaman, Tribe of Anthropik 28 July 2005 Thesis #1: Diversity is the primary good. Humans are social animals, and also capable of abstract, independent thought. So, too, with evolution. This is entirely backwards.

Related: