Using SAMR to Teach Above the Line - Getting Smart by Susan Oxnevad - 1:1 program, Apple, edchat, EdTech, SAMR, technology For as long as I can remember I have been an advocate for helping teachers understand the stages of technology integration to help them effectively use tech as a tool for learning. I’ve adopted a few different tech integration models over the years, discussed the ideas with administrators for use as a starting point for tech integration, and kept the ideas front of mind as I invent and discover new ways for using technology as a tool for learning. Discussing the stages of tech integration has led to some thought provoking and inspiring conversations, but the ideas have not gained a lot of momentum in my face-to-face teaching environment until now. As many districts jump on board with 1:1 implementation, Apple’s use of the SAMR model as a framework for tech integration presents a consistent, clear and powerful message that is spreading! About SAMR Researchers have determined that technology integration typically moves through specific levels. Image created by Dr. An Emphasis on Task Design
Taxonomía de Bloom para la Era Digital Andrew Churches Descargue este documento en formato PDF La Taxonomía de Bloom y la Taxonomía Revisada de Bloom [1] son herramientas clave para los docentes y los encargados del diseño de capacitaciones. Esta es entonces una actualización de la Taxonomía Revisada de Bloom [1] que atiende los nuevos comportamientos, acciones y oportunidades de aprendizaje que aparecen a medida que las TIC (Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones) avanzan y se vuelven más omnipresentes. Tanto la Taxonomía Original como la revisada por Anderson y Krathwohl [1] se centran en el dominio cognitivo. Mientras que Bloom representa el proceso de aprendizaje en sus diferentes niveles, esto no implica que los estudiantes deban empezar en el nivel taxonómico más bajo para luego subir a otros niveles. Esta taxonomía para la era digital no se enfoca en las herramientas y en las TIC, pues éstas son apenas los medios. Habilidades de Pensamiento de Orden Inferior (LOTS)
Technology Integration Research Review Editor's Note: This article was originally written by Vanessa Vega, with subsequent updates made by the Edutopia staff. Technology integration can be one of the most challenging topics to find quality research on. The term itself is a broad umbrella for numerous practices that may have little in common with each other. In addition, technology tools change rapidly, and outcomes can vary depending on implementation. Edutopia's tech integration review explores some of the vast body of research out there and helps you navigate useful results. What Is Successful Technology Integration? A key transition over the history of information technology has been in the shift from passive audiences to active users. Read our article about successful technology integration for more ideas on the many different ways teachers and schools are integrating technology today. Learning Outcomes Continue to the next section of the Tech Integration Research Review, Evidence-Based Programs by Subject.
The SAMR Ladder Through the Lens of 21st Century Skills - Getting Smart by Susan Oxnevad - EdTech, SAMR, Teaching This summer I have been digging deeper into the SAMR model of tech integration to help educators embrace 1:1 learning and the changes it will bring about. SAMR is a truly useful tool for helping teachers identify their current comfort zone in order to build expertise in designing efficient and effective student learning experiences. To reach higher levels on the SAMR ladder, teachers can make some planning and instructional shifts. A look at the big picture is helpful when trying to understand how to help students develop important 21st Century Skills at each level. Through the Lens of 21st Century Skills I have created an interactive graphic of the SAMR Ladder to illustrate the big picture. Final Thoughts The learning that occurs as teachers climb up the SAMR ladder is what will eventually lead to successful lesson design.
Jordi Adell: “Las TIC no hacen bueno o malo a un docente” Antes que nada, ¿qué entendemos por tecnología educativa? La tecnología educativa es una rama de las ciencias de la educación, de la pedagogía, que trata el uso de los dispositivos tecnológicos, en su sentido más amplio. ¿Cómo podemos mejorar la calidad de la enseñanza mediante el uso de las nuevas tecnologías? Poniéndolas al servicio de la buena pedagogía. He aprendido que las nuevas tecnologías no hacen bueno o malo a un profesor, ya que éstas, por sí mismas, prácticamente no sirven para nada en las escuelas. ¿Cuál es la mejor forma de integrar las nuevas tecnologías en el aula? Se conformará… Aún así, cada vez hay más profesores convencidos de que el sistema educativo actual no responde con suficiente rapidez a las demandas del entorno social y están empezando a incorporar la tecnología en sus aulas. ¿Qué implica esta incorporación? ¿Por qué cree que la administración no ha hecho este cambio de mentalidad? ¿Qué debemos entender por una persona educada?
ISTE NETS Essential Conditions Entrevista para Curalia – Fundación Telefónica Recupero una entrevista que me hicieron para el Proyecto Curalia de la Fundación Telefónica a comienzos de este año y que, como el resto del proyecto, reposa hoy en el limbo digital. A partir de los casos de éxito en el uso de las TIC en la educación que conoces, ¿consideras que hay elementos o características comunes que nos ayuden a orientar la integración de la tecnología para la mejora del aprendizaje? Considero que hay tres elementos clave que contribuyen a una integración de las TIC en el aula exitosa: A nivel de centros: Los equipos directivos deben liderar el cambio en los centros, no solamente por lo que respecta al uso de las tecnologías sino especialmente enl o que se refiere a la redefinición del papel de la escuela en la Sociedad del Conocimiento y la revisión de las pedagogías que se ponen en práctica en el aula. La administración debería aligerar la carga de gestión que soportan para que puedan centrarse en ese liderazgo pedagógico, metodológico y tecnológico.
National Center for Technology Planning John See Technology Integration Specialist Minnesota Department of Education [Originally appeared in The Computing Teacher, Vol. 19, Number 8, May 1992] Contact information for John See -- unavailable as of Feb 2012 Effective technology plans are short term, not long term. If you do develop a long-term plan, tie it to your district's budget cycle. Effective technology plans focus on applications, not technology. Many technology plans are based on numbers of machines - input. By taking this approach, you can also answer the debate over which brand names to purchase. Effective technology plans go beyond enhancing the curriculum. I agree that we need to teach keyboarding skills. Remember the real question, "what applications of technology are available that will help our students, staff, and administration work smarter, not harder?" Effective technology plans define technology as more than computers. Television production is much more than giving kids a camera and shooting pictures.
jordi_cd6: actividades coherentes National Education Technology Plan | Office of Educational Technology About the National Educational Technology Plan The U.S. Department of Education released the 2024 National Educational Technology Plan (NETP): A Call to Action for Closing the Digital Access, Design and Use Divides. First released in fulfillment of the 2000 Educate America Act, NETP has been updated multiple times since its original release, most recently in 2016. While past NETPs have largely served as surveys of the state of the field, the Department of Education’s 2024 NETP frames three key divides limiting the transformational potential of educational technology to support teaching and learning, including: The Digital Use Divide, addressing opportunities to improve how students use technology to enhance their learning, including dynamic applications of technology to explore, create, and engage in critical analysis of academic content and knowledge;
6 elements of a successful iPad implementation By Samantha Messier and Stephanie Schroeder 11/17/2014 Topics: Mobile Learning, 1-to-1, Professional learning As more districts across the United States move to 1:1 initiatives, a common barrier is financial resources, and a common temptation is to regard these initiatives as technology enterprises rather than instructional transformations. In a three-year pilot project, the Boulder Valley School District (BVSD) addressed these challenges by implementing a creative approach designed to entice public funders by providing all students with equitable access to digital devices. A key feature of our model was synergy among multiple, interdependent program elements: Community engagement A strong instructional model Digital devices and apps for students Logistical support Guidance toward high-leverage resources Ongoing, embedded professional development None of these elements alone is sufficient. 1. We also made every effort to include one of the most important stakeholder groups: parents.
A Technology Integration Planning (TIP) Model For Teachers Teachers are the ones that decide on instructional strategies and how to carry them out. When teachers create an instructional design for technology integration, they need to consider the characteristics of their topic and the needs of their students and then decide on a course of action that will meet both needs within the constraints of their classroom environment. When deciding on teaching/learning methods the first distinction a teacher must make is whether or not to use directed strategies or constructive strategies. After determining whether integration strategies will be primarily directed or constructive, also consider content approach. Should the approach be single subject or interdisciplinary? A few other questions that a teacher will need to answer while developing instruction is: Should students work individually, in pairs, in small groups, or as a whole class? Remember as a teacher you never stop learning.
The Practical Effect of Twitter Chats + Pedagogy Wheel Many months ago I founded what would quickly become the largest Australian ‘ed-chat’ on twitter. The ‘#aussieED’ twitter chat runs on a Sunday at 8:30pm every Sunday night. Shortly after beginning, an awesome team began forming around me and together we have literally been able to reach tens of thousands of teachers across Australia using the twitter platform. The speed of the take up has been outstanding and it has highlighted the fact that there is a genuine desire from classroom teachers to control their professional development and tailor their learning to allow them to provide tangible changes and improvements to the activities that teachers provide students in their classrooms. The #aussieED mantra is CONNECTION, COLLABORATION and INSPIRATION. One of the greatest impacts of having teachers be in control of their own Profession Development is the ‘renaissance’ of teaching and learning that is occurring in classrooms, not only in Australia, but across the globe. Brett Salakas