Argument map A schematic argument map showing a contention (or conclusion), supporting arguments and objections, and an inference objection. Argument maps are commonly used in the context of teaching and applying critical thinking. The purpose of mapping is to uncover the logical structure of arguments, identify unstated assumptions, evaluate the support an argument offers for a conclusion, and aid understanding of debates. Argument maps are often designed to support deliberation of issues, ideas and arguments in wicked problems. Key features A number of different kinds of argument map have been proposed but the most common, which Chris Reed and Glenn Rowe called the standard diagram, consists of a tree structure with each of the reasons leading to the conclusion. According to Doug Walton and colleagues, an argument map has two basic components: "One component is a set of circled numbers arrayed as points. Statements 1 and 2 are dependent premises or co-premises History Notes
Prioritization - 1000Minds 1000Minds helps you prioritize alternatives or individuals systematically and transparently. Prioritization involves confronting difficult choices, the implications of which can be monumental for the people affected. Examples include: prioritizing patients for access to ‘elective’ (ie. non-urgent) health care – see case study, peer-reviewed articles, news items ‘health technology prioritization’ – ie. deciding which pharmaceuticals, medical devices, equipment, procedures, etc to fund – see news release, peer-reviewed articles, news items prioritizing social welfare assistance (eg. housing, health care, income support) for people in need ranking research-grant funding applications selecting students for scholarships or admission to restricted courses Criteria and weights Such prioritization decisions – often implemented by groups of decision-makers – involve agreeing on the relevant criteria for the decision at hand and weighting them and other considerations relative to each other.
So, what exactly is an argument map? | Argunet This is a quick introduction into argument maps: How to create them, how to read them and what you can expect to get out of it. An Argunet argument map visualises the structure of complex argumentations and debates as a graphical network. In this network all nodes are either sentences or arguments and all relations between them are either attack or support relations. The reconstruction and visualisation with argument maps can be useful in many ways: Argument maps can give you a fast overview over the state of a debateArgument maps help you to remember complex argumentation structuresThe logical reconstruction allows a detailed analysis and evaluation of arguments and dialectic strategiesArgument maps help to keep focused on relevant parts of the debate by filtering out irrelevant or redundant informationArgument maps help concentrate on a rational, fair debateArgument maps can guide and structure live discussions. How do I read an argument map? Sentences Arguments Reconstructed Arguments
The Analysis-Synthesis Bridge Model Written for Interactions magazine by Hugh Dubberly, Shelley Evenson, and Rick Robinson. The simplest way to describe the design process is to divide it into two phases: analysis and synthesis. Or preparation and inspiration. But those descriptions miss a crucial element—the connection between the two, the active move from one state to another, the transition or transformation that is at the heart of designing. How do designers move from analysis to synthesis? From problem to solution? How do designers bridge the gap? The bridge model illustrates one way of thinking about the path from analysis to synthesis—the way in which the use of models to frame research results acts as a basis for framing possible futures. The bridge model here is organized as a two-by-two matrix. Analysis-Synthesis Bridge Model Ideally, the design process begins in the lower-left quadrant with observation and investigation—an inventory (or description) of the current situation. Robinson Model Beer Model Kumar Model
Global Priorities Project | Future of Humanity Institute Summary The Global Priorities Project aims to bring new analysis to the problem of how to allocate scarce resources between diverse global priorities such as education, health, enterprise, and future generations. The project is hosted by the Future of Humanity Institute in collaboration with the Centre for Effective Altruism. The importance of prioritisation Every day organisations and governments make decisions about how to use their resources to benefit society. Without prioritising between their options, these organisations would achieve far fewer of their aims than they would by prioritising. There are theoretical reasons to expect large disparities between the effectiveness of different types of intervention in different fields. Framework In order to compare between options, we need a common scale on which to rank them. Recommendations Researchers Owen Cotton-Barratt leads the Global Priorities Project. Nick Beckstead is a research fellow at the Future of Humanity Institute.
Xebece Xebece is a multipurpose tool for information visualization and organization. It can be used to set up intriguing presentations. Likewise, document management is straightforward and effective if you use Xebece. Application fields of Xebece include presentations, courses and training, document management, mind mapping and brainstorming, and knowledge management. Release Notes: This release features German documentation for Xebece and a documentation update in the English manual. Release Notes: This is a bugfix release. Release Notes: The move/drag functionality was much too fast for normal use; this has been fixed. No changes have been submitted for this release.
What is a Decision Matrix, FREE Template and Example Also known as: decision-making matrix, solutions prioritization matrix, cost/benefit analysis matrix, problem/solution matrix, options/criteria matrix, vendor selection matrix, criteria/alternatives matrix, RFP evaluation matrix, COWS decision matrix, C.O.W.S. decision matrix, supplier rating spreadsheet, comparison matrix template, importance/performance matrix, criteria-based decision matrix, importance/performance-based decision matrix, weighted score matrix, proposal evaluation matrix, criteria/alternatives matrix, software selection matrix, or bid decision matrix. Use templates and samples provided in your FREE RFP Letters Toolkit to create your own Decision Matrix. Decision Matrix Definition A decision matrix allows decision makers to structure, then solve their problem by: specifying and prioritizing their needs with a list a criteria; thenevaluating, rating, and comparing the different solutions; and selecting the best matching solution. The Decision Matrix is also called: and then
Category:Decision theory Decision theory is the study of optimal actions, as determined by considering the probability and utility of different outcomes. Subcategories This category has the following 15 subcategories, out of 15 total. Pages in category "Decision theory" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 207 total. (previous 200) (next 200)(previous 200) (next 200) Graphviz Society for Judgment and Decision Making Murphy's Law Calculator Murphy's Law Calculator From a formula for * Sod's Law provided by British Gas: ((U+C+I) x (10-S))/20 x A x 1/(1-sin(F/10)) "anything that can go wrong, will go wrong!" Find out in advance whether you will be able to successfully repair your VCR, get to a meeting on time, impress your date, or be a success at any activity whatsoever ! British Gas commissioned Dr David Lewis, a chartered psychologist; Dr Keylan Leyser, an economist and business consultant; and Philip Obadya, a mathematician, to devise the formula. Likelihood scores are for a typical adult and are based on the nation-wide survey of 1023 adults, conducted by Taylor Nelson Sofres (TNS) that the team used to test their work. Murphy's Law Links: Note: Murphy's Law has long been known in the UK as "Sod's Law".
Editor | Argunet Argunet Editor is a free argument map editor for analyzing and visualizing complex debates. You can use it offline and save your debates on your hard-disk. Or you can use it as a client-server application. Fast sketching mode: You can use Argunet to quickly outline the macro-structure of a debate. If this all sounds like gibberish to you, don’t worry. Installation In order to run Argunet, a Java Runtime Environment 6.0 or higher has to be installed on your Computer. Please select the download files for your operations system below and follow the install instructions. After you installed your version of Argunet we highly recommend that you install the two plugins we currently provide: the yFiles Layouter and yFiles Exporter. To install the Argunet layout and export plugins open the ‘Help’ Menu in Argunet and select ‘Install Argunet plugins’. Download Microsoft Windows If you don’t know which version you need (64bit or 32bit), read these instructions by Microsoft. Mac OS X Linux On request.