background preloader

9-11 Review

9-11 Review
Related:  news 4Investigative OrganizationsGeneral

An Independent Investigation of the 9-11-2001 Attack History of American false flag operations The leaders of smaller and less industrialised nations are not madmen (whatever the media claims). They also are generally better informed than their citizens. In a war an attacker does not need equal forces compared to the enemy. The attacker needs a 5-fold local superiority, or better. No one begins wars without very definite objectives and a quick victory in sight. After the American war of Independence (1776-1779), and an English challenge to that independence (1812-1814) no single nation has planned an offensive war against the USA. Mexican wars 1819, 1846-48: Long series of operations, commencing with the annexion of Florida (1819) and followed by a declaration of independence of Texas from Mexico (1836). Spanish-American war, 1898: The surprise explosion of the battleship Maine at Havana, Cuba. 255 of the crew died. World War I, 1914-1918: A U-boat torpedo hit ocean liner Lusitania near Britain and some 1200 people, including 128 Americans, on board lost their lives. Robert B.

Pilots For 9/11 Truth 911Blogger.com | Paying Attention to 9/11 Related News 9/11 Citizens Watch 9-11 Citizens Watch is a "citizen-led watchdog network established to support independent investigation, research and analysis into the attacks of September 11th and its political and economic aftermath."[1] The group was formed in March 2003 to monitor the work of the 9/11 Commission, and following the publication of the 9/11 Commission Report released a commentary entitled "The 9/11 Omission Report History[edit] Kyle Hence, a professional yacht captain and semi-professional photographer, launched unansweredquestions.org in May 2002 in an attempt to increase media coverage of his "unanswered questions" relating to the September 11, 2001 attacks. Subsequently, the 9/11 Family Steering Committee and 9/11 Citizens Watch were created to monitor the work of the Commission. The Christian Science Monitor reported that, in anticipation of the Commission hearings, 9/11 Citizens Watch launched ads in Washington newspapers calling for fuller disclosure. Press Coverage[edit] References[edit]

9-11 Review: The 9-11-01 Attack:Reality and Mythology Many regard the September 11, 2001 attack as the most important event in American history. It killed more people inside U.S. boundaries than any other one-day event since the Pearl Harbor attack. Yet those who died in the horrific carnage in Manhattan, Washington, and Pennsylvania that Tuesday morning were only the most direct victims of the attack. Far more people would die and suffer in the ensuing "war on terror" -- the underpinning of unprecedented attacks on civil liberties and due process, the doctrine of pre-emptive attack on sovereign nations, an orgy of war and surveillance profiteering, and an accelerated dismantling of corporate and government accountability. Several essential facts of the 9/11/01 attack are obvious: It was an act of mass-murder killing nearly three thousand people. The 9/11 attack legend was introduced nearly fully formed on the day of the attack.

davidraygriffin.com | This website is maintained by Edward Rynearson (not by Dr. Griffin himself). For additional information, please visit the "about" section (under "The Pages," below). The 9/11 Consensus Points Factual Evidence Contradicts the 9/11 Story The official account of the events of September 11, 2001, has been used: to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, which have resulted in the deaths of over a million people; 1 to authorize torture, military tribunals, and extraordinary rendition; andto suspend freedoms guaranteed by the American Constitution such as habeas corpus in the USA, and similar freedoms in Canada, the UK, and other countries. The official claims regarding 9/11 are contradicted by facts that have been validated by a scientific consensus process, and which include the following points of “best evidence”. The 37 Consensus Points are divided into the nine categories below, which in turn link to the individual 37 points: A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. V. A. Point G-1: A Claim Regarding Osama bin Laden Point G-2: A Claim that there was No Insider Trading in Put Options before September 11, 2001 B. Point TT-3: A Claim Excluding Explosions in the Twin Towers C. D. E. F. G. H. I. V.

<| Visibility 9-11 |> The Longest-running Podcast of 9/11 News & Information, Interviews, and Activism & Outreach for the Truth About the Terror Attacks of September 11th, 2001 Waging A Phony War on Terror. “Terrorists R US” Defines U.S. Foreign Policy Waging it isn’t new. Enemies are needed. When none exist they’re invented. Reagan denounced the “evil scourge of terrorism.” His Secretary of State George Schultz called it “modern barbarism. GW Bush declared war on terrorism. Orwell said political rhetoric defends the indefensible. The late Howard Zinn asked “(h)ow can you make war on terrorism if war is terrorism.” US Code defines terrorism as activities involving: (A) “violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State;”(B) are intended to -(i) “intimidate or coerce a civilian population;(ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or(iii) affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and(C) occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States….” Its sole decider.

911 untersuchen | Persönlichkeiten aus der Schweiz für eine neue, unabhängige 911-Untersuchung

Related: