background preloader

9-11 Review

9-11 Review
Related:  Investigative OrganizationsGeneral

History of American false flag operations The leaders of smaller and less industrialised nations are not madmen (whatever the media claims). They also are generally better informed than their citizens. In a war an attacker does not need equal forces compared to the enemy. The attacker needs a 5-fold local superiority, or better. No one begins wars without very definite objectives and a quick victory in sight. After the American war of Independence (1776-1779), and an English challenge to that independence (1812-1814) no single nation has planned an offensive war against the USA. Mexican wars 1819, 1846-48: Long series of operations, commencing with the annexion of Florida (1819) and followed by a declaration of independence of Texas from Mexico (1836). Spanish-American war, 1898: The surprise explosion of the battleship Maine at Havana, Cuba. 255 of the crew died. World War I, 1914-1918: A U-boat torpedo hit ocean liner Lusitania near Britain and some 1200 people, including 128 Americans, on board lost their lives. Robert B.

Pilots For 9/11 Truth | Paying Attention to 9/11 Related News 9-11 Review: The 9-11-01 Attack:Reality and Mythology Many regard the September 11, 2001 attack as the most important event in American history. It killed more people inside U.S. boundaries than any other one-day event since the Pearl Harbor attack. Yet those who died in the horrific carnage in Manhattan, Washington, and Pennsylvania that Tuesday morning were only the most direct victims of the attack. Far more people would die and suffer in the ensuing "war on terror" -- the underpinning of unprecedented attacks on civil liberties and due process, the doctrine of pre-emptive attack on sovereign nations, an orgy of war and surveillance profiteering, and an accelerated dismantling of corporate and government accountability. Several essential facts of the 9/11/01 attack are obvious: It was an act of mass-murder killing nearly three thousand people. The 9/11 attack legend was introduced nearly fully formed on the day of the attack. | This website is maintained by Edward Rynearson (not by Dr. Griffin himself). For additional information, please visit the "about" section (under "The Pages," below). The 9/11 Consensus Points Factual Evidence Contradicts the 9/11 Story The official account of the events of September 11, 2001, has been used: to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, which have resulted in the deaths of over a million people; 1 to authorize torture, military tribunals, and extraordinary rendition; andto suspend freedoms guaranteed by the American Constitution such as habeas corpus in the USA, and similar freedoms in Canada, the UK, and other countries. The official claims regarding 9/11 are contradicted by facts that have been validated by a scientific consensus process, and which include the following points of “best evidence”. The 37 Consensus Points are divided into the nine categories below, which in turn link to the individual 37 points: A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. V. A. Point G-1: A Claim Regarding Osama bin Laden Point G-2: A Claim that there was No Insider Trading in Put Options before September 11, 2001 B. Point TT-3: A Claim Excluding Explosions in the Twin Towers C. D. E. F. G. H. I. V.

Waging A Phony War on Terror. “Terrorists R US” Defines U.S. Foreign Policy Waging it isn’t new. Enemies are needed. When none exist they’re invented. Reagan denounced the “evil scourge of terrorism.” His Secretary of State George Schultz called it “modern barbarism. GW Bush declared war on terrorism. Orwell said political rhetoric defends the indefensible. The late Howard Zinn asked “(h)ow can you make war on terrorism if war is terrorism.” US Code defines terrorism as activities involving: (A) “violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State;”(B) are intended to -(i) “intimidate or coerce a civilian population;(ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or(iii) affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and(C) occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States….” Its sole decider.

911 untersuchen | Persönlichkeiten aus der Schweiz für eine neue, unabhängige 911-Untersuchung 25 Hard Facts About 9/11 That Cannot Be Debunked Sources: Mike Wayne & HANG THE BANKERS In the 14 years since the events of September 11, 2001, independent researchers have assembled a overwhelming body of evidence contradicting the official account. This article (and the accompanying video) presents 25 facts about 9/11 that, taken together, should cause you to seriously question the official story. Links to many supporting articles are given. Polls show that 30% of Americans do not believe the official story. RELATED ARTICLE: Psychologists Explain 9/11 Denial Despite Hard Scientific Evidence And, for those who won’t even consider the possibility that our own government orchestrated 9/11, this article is a must read: RELATED ARTICLE: Dire Warnings From Past U.S. Here is a list of 25 facts that cannot be debunked about 9/11 (from the above video). 1) Nano Thermite was found in the dust at Ground Zero, which is documented in this peer-reviewed report by Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal. 5) Dick Cheney was in command of NORAD on 9/11.

The Charlie Hebdo Attack: Characteristics of a False Flag Operation? The Charlie Hebdo affair has many of the characteristics of a false flag operation. The attack on the cartoonists’ office was a disciplined professional attack of the kind associated with highly trained special forces; yet the suspects who were later corralled and killed seemed bumbling and unprofessional. It is like two different sets of people. Usually Muslim terrorists are prepared to die in the attack; yet the two professionals who hit Charlie Hebdo were determined to escape and succeeded, an amazing feat. It is a plausible inference that the ID left behind in the getaway car was the ID of the two Kouachi brothers, convenient patsies, later killed by police, and from whom we will never hear anything, and not the ID of the professionals who attacked Charlie Hebdo. Hamyd Mourad says he has an iron-clad alibi. The American and European media have ignored the fact that Mourad turned himself in for protection from being killed as a terrorist as he has an alibi. Who will liberate them?

A Coalition for Major Outreach This 9/11 Anniversary Heather Callaghan | Activist Post We are rapidly approaching 13 years since the tragic events of September 11, 2001, where the facts surrounding the deaths of thousands of Americans continue in suppressed fashion, garnering yearly rehashes of the original narrative. As calendar pages turn, so fades public interest and perhaps attempts at outreach and education regarding the facts. As time goes on, 9/11 truth is teetering on the edge of enmeshment with other obscured events which carry the scarlet letter of “conspiracy theory,” and thus, with a public in the dark, the implausible official stories are passed on, but not legitimately investigated. Ground Zero 911 coalition is determined to prevent the lapse of the facts into an eternal blurry memory hole. As the Ground Zero 911 website states, “This movement was started by the victims’ family members who had questions. On the website, you will find a request for volunteers, donations, and, most importantly, involvement.