Size Isn't Everything - The Chronicle Review By Cathy N. Davidson James Yang for The Chronicle Review My reading material to and from London recently for the annual open-source programming event known as Mozfest, or the Mozilla Festival, included two glossy magazines focusing on the future of education: the November 19 cover story in Forbes and the entire November issue of Wired UK, an offshoot of the American magazine. Should educators be delighted by this unexpected attention—or very, very worried? A little of both. Let's look at Wired UK first. Featured are both Negroponte 1.0, the editorial that launched Wired in 1993, and the new Negroponte 2.0. Given that such 20/20 foresight is rare, it is worth paying attention to Negroponte 2.0. He also still maintains a position he stated long ago: "Computers are not about computing, but everyday life." If you are a traditional educator, you should be scared. So what's different in 2.0? "Educational reform" is also on the lips of many college presidents and policy makers these days.
Comment réinventer l’éducation avec le numérique ? At this year’s Futur en Seine digital festival in Paris, Econocom presented the “classroom of the future” , a four-day workshop where visitors could experiment with digital text books, digital whiteboards and tablets, technology which is set to revolutionise teaching as we know it all over the world. Yet the central question remains how to use this new technology to impart knowledge? How to use digital tools to reinvent teaching methods and better address both teachers and students’ needs? Here’s an insight into how digital technology is changing education and the advantages it can bring. Photo ©Benjamin Boccas Are schools lagging behind the digital revolution? Schoolchildren sitting their secondary school diplomas this year will have seen the birth of Wikipedia in 2001, Facebook in 2004, Youtube in 2005, Twitter in 2006, Instagram in 2010, not to mention the explosion of video games, laptops, smartphones and tablets in a hyper-connected world. Digital in the classroom: how does it work?
Coursera - the Key to Higher Education Coursera offers free college courses from many top-notch universities from around the globe. Their goal is to make higher education available on a massive scale. Though there are doubtlessly as many stories as there are students, this is my story. I never thought I would have the opportunity to experience higher education, and certainly not in such a format as Coursera offers. Misdiagnosed as 'Emotionally Disturbed' As a child, I had difficulties in school. My parents were horrified when I was diagnosed as 'emotionally disturbed.' I spent a lot of time feeling bad about my status as a college dropout. Coursera - a free education? Not only were the courses free, but they were being offered by quality universities. Introduction to Sociology, and College Life The first class to start was Introduction to Sociology. I even participated in the discussion boards -- socializing in a way that would have never been possible for me in a live setting.
This could be huge... Moocs are already big - in reach and in hype - and are predicted to explode. Zoë Corbyn checks in to learn if they are more than just a novelty and to find out what it’s like to teach a class of 38,000 Kristin Sainani, clinical assistant professor in health policy at Stanford University, has just finished teaching her most popular course ever. But its popularity was far beyond the scale of a class of several hundred students, with seminar rooms and lecture theatres bursting at the seams. Over eight weeks, the students took part via short online video lectures, discussion forums, automated quizzes and assignments graded by peers. Sainani’s programme was a Mooc, a massive open online course, a new beast in the academy that has risen rapidly in prominence, attracting considerable hype and media coverage. So what attracts academics to experiment with the model? Second, creating a Mooc would help her to “flip the classroom” in her traditional teaching on campus.
Rethinking Higher Ed Open Online Learning - US News & World Report Karen Symms Gallagher is dean of the Rossier School of Education at the University of Southern California. With the rush of pronouncements, you'd think Higher Ed 2.0 is here, all online, all the time. Brick-and-mortar and ivy are passé. Not so fast. It's worth decoding what's out there and what isn't. Professors at MIT, Stanford, and Harvard and many fine academic minds have put thousands of top-notch college courses online. [Read the U.S. Logging on to these lectures is often like watching through a one-way mirror—albeit for free and, say, with 15,000 classmates. I can't help thinking that the massive open online course explosion so far is a bigger, better delivery system of The Great Courses, which my husband and I have enjoyed for years. Some open online courses award students a certificate of participation, an academic currency without much heft in today's job market. [See the U.S. But that's not what worries me about open online courses. [Read the U.S.
Adieu diplômes, voici les badges Recevez nos newsletters : C’est encore expérimental. Mais les grandes universités américaines envisagent de délivrer des badges de compétences aux étudiants qui suivent leurs formations en ligne gratuite. Avec l’éducation en ligne, il est désormais possible de suivre des formations dans plusieurs établissements en même temps. Un cours de physique au MIT par-ci, un cours d’histoire à Stanford par-là, et pourquoi pas un cours d’informatique à Harvard pour finir, et tout ça gratuitement! Mais les diplômes étant conçus pour sanctionner un cursus précis, comment permettre aux étudiants de valoriser les compétences ainsi acquises? Délivrés sous forme électronique, ces badges prennent la forme d’un petit logo symbolisant la compétence développée. Et les avantages des badges ne s’arrêtent pas là! Les entreprises comment déjà à s’y intéresser. De son côté la fondation Mozilla, à l’origine du navigateur web Firefox, a mis en place le système permettant de les gérer.
Classroom of 2020: The future is very different than you think Imagine: you wake up at 9:23 a.m. one September morning in 2020. Your alarm failed to sound and now you’re late. But don’t fret. Your commute to school consists of carrying your laptop to the kitchen table. No need for a back-to-school outfit, as you settle in wearing pyjamas. When you load today’s lecture video you don’t see your professor; instead, a classmate appears on the screen. Your classmate uses the word “atavistic” and you pause the lecture to look it up. After a while, your eyes wander to the window. If the above seems like a far-fetched prediction of what a classroom might be like in 2020, you’re behind the times. This is the brave new world of higher education, where students teach professors, technology enables digital note-passing and online courses enroll thousands of students. In an era when a student can access more information through her cellphone than a professor can consume in a lifetime, is the university as a physical place obsolete?
MOOCs and Pedagogy: Teacher-Centered, Student-Centered, and Hybrids In writing about all of the hype surrounding MOOCs, I saw this photo entitled “University Classroom of the Future.” From instructional television in the 1950s through updated versions of “distance education, “a professor professing in front of a camera is familiar and surely will dominate many of the newly established platforms (e.g., Coursera, Udacity, edX). Whether it will be the “University Classroom of the Future,” I cannot say for sure. But the photo makes the professor front and center in teaching content and skills. The prevailing version of MOOCs offers traditional, technology-enriched teacher-centered instruction, that is, lecturing to large groups of people, asking occasional questions, online discussion sections, and multiple-choice questions on exams. There are other ways of teaching these courses, however. Again, George Siemens: “In all of the MOOCs I’ve run, readings and resources have been used that reflect the current understanding of experts in the field. 1. 2. Like this:
Jump Off the Coursera Bandwagon - Commentary By Doug Guthrie Like lemmings, too many American colleges are mindlessly rushing out to find a way to deliver online education, and more and more often they are choosing Coursera. The company, founded this year by two Stanford University computer scientists, has already enrolled more than two million students, has engaged 33 academic institutions as partners, and is offering more than 200 free massive open online courses, or MOOC's. A college's decision to jump on the Coursera bandwagon is aided—and eased—by knowing that academic heavyweights like Harvard, Stanford, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology are already on board. As one college president described it to The New York Times, "You're known by your partners, and this is the College of Cardinals." In our haste to join the academic alphas, many of us are forgoing the reflection necessary to enter this new medium. Coursera and its devotees simply have it wrong. The recent history of the newspaper industry is instructive.
Why Learning Should Be Messy The following is an excerpt of One Size Does Not Fit All: A Student’s Assessment of School, by 17-year-old Nikhil Goyal, a senior at Syosset High School in Woodbury, New York. Can creativity be taught? Absolutely. “Today’s problems — from global poverty to climate change to the obesity epidemic — are more interconnected and intertwined than ever before and they can’t possibly be solved in the academic or research ‘silos’ of the twentieth century,” writes Frank Moss, the former head of the M.I.T. Schools cannot just simply add a “creativity hour” and call it a day. Principal at High Tech High, an innovative, project-based learning school in San Diego, California, Larry Rosenstock, points out, “If you were to hike the Appalachian trail, which would take you months and months, and you reflect upon it, you do not divide the experience into the historic, scientific, mathematic, and English aspects of it. The first phase of the arc is called exploration. Similarly, the M.I.T. Related
Coursera will profit from “Free” courses, competition heats up. Are MOOC’s really about FREE education? Coursera reveals how it intends to generate revenue off of “freely” available MOOC’s. In fact, many MOOC companies are launching business models where students and institutions will pay.Competition heats up between MOOC’s and traditional LMS companies. To be clear Coursera, Udacity and others are simply learning management systems bundled with high quality content. In fact “It’s an LMS [learning management system] that’s wrapped around a very high-quality course,” says Daphne Koller, a Coursera co-founder. According to contract documents, Coursera will pay the universities 6 to 15 percent of revenues, which will be determined on a per-course basis and dependent upon the duration of the course, the number and quality of assessments. So what’s the MOOC model? There are 8 possible monetization strategies that MOOC providers like Coursera, or Learning Management System providers could adopt: