Ink Tank - Make words not war

The ten greatest short story writers of the twenty-first century? What, we scoff, only ten? After all, the century’s fourteen already – that’s enough time to compile a list twice as long as this one! However, we’re going to restrict ourselves to ten because we’re also interested in your input: which story writers have blown your mind since the big Y2K? Leave your comments below! Continue reading The Rolling Stones have probably released more iconic tracks than any other band in history. Continue reading Songs about books, books about music: who says worlds don’t collide? 1. Less a novel than a short-story cycle (interlinked stories, doncha know), but an absolutely rocking read for all that: spanning several decades, from the sixties to the near future, and leaping from Africa to Europe and back to the States, it loosely follows the adventures of a group of folk involved with the San Francisco music scene. Continue reading Novels, novels, we all love novels. Continue reading 1. 1. 2.

The Bored Ninja - Fun, Interesting, and Cool Stuff on the Internet | Flash Games, Videos, and Pictures to cure your boredom! Big Words - Or, What Teacher Meant When They Said "Lexicon" Dangerous Minds WHAT THE FUCK HAVE YOU DONE? Dan McKinley :: Effective Web Experimentation as a Homo Narrans If there's anything people are good at, it's retrofitting events with a coherent narrative. Even, or maybe especially, when the ultimate causes of past events are the forces of chance. If you look closely you can see this everywhere. The modern reader might be tempted to chuckle at this display of superstitious lunacy. So let me hastily change gears and point out that a large percentage of CNBC programming is a more benign manifestation of this kind of thinking. A classic bearish head and shoulders pattern seems to suggest that further declines may be ahead. And if you want another example, go check the Facebook profile of every ostensibly-atheist Brooklyn asshole you know the next time Mercury is in retrograde. There is a school of thought in biology—and don't ask me how widely this is accepted—that evolution favors Type II errors ("failing to reject a falsehood") over Type I errors ("failing to accept a truth"). Practical Consequences I am going somewhere with this, of course. Right?