Liberating Structures - Liberating Structures Menu Recapitulation theory The theory of recapitulation, also called the biogenetic law or embryological parallelism— often expressed in Ernst Haeckel's phrase as "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny"—is a largely discredited biological hypothesis that in developing from embryo to adult, animals go through stages resembling or representing successive stages in the evolution of their remote ancestors. With different formulations, such ideas have been applied and extended to several fields and areas, including the origin of language, religion, biology, cognition and mental activities,[1] anthropology,[2] education theory[3] and developmental psychology.[4] While examples of embryonic stages show that molecular features of ancestral organisms exist, the theory of recapitulation itself has been viewed within the field of developmental biology as a historical side-note rather than as dogma.[5][6][7] In contrast, there is no consensus against the validity of the theory outside biology. Origins[edit] Haeckel[edit]
VF - Elisabeth Kübler-Ross Un article de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre. Elisabeth Kübler-Ross, née le 8 juillet 1926 à Zurich en Suisse et morte le 24 août 2004 aux États-Unis, est une psychiatre et une psychologue helvético-américaine, pionnière de l'approche des « soins palliatifs » pour les personnes en fin de vie. Elle est connue pour sa théorisation des différents stades émotionnels par lesquels passe une personne qui apprend sa mort prochaine. Biographie[modifier | modifier le code] Elisabeth naît le 8 juillet 1926 à Zurich. En 1942, désirant devenir médecin, elle travaille dans la clinique du docteur Karl Zehnder[2]. En 1951, elle passe l'équivalent du bac et est reçue à l'Université de Zurich et reçoit son diplôme en 1957, se marie avec Emanuel Ross[2] et se rend aux États-Unis[3]. Elle obtient son titre de psychiatre en 1963 à l'Université du Colorado[4]. Stades de la mort annoncée[modifier | modifier le code] Hommage[modifier | modifier le code] Elle est inscrite au National Women's Hall of Fame.
Obsessive Debunking Disorder (ODD)? By Thomas Sheridan | Thomas Sheridan Arts Are Hardcore Skeptics and Debunkers Actually Brain Deficient? Their Own Beloved Hard Science Might Well Suggest Many Are. We have all encountered them. The men and women of reason. The self-appointed guardians and vanguards of materialist dogma along with their absolute faith and belief in official government and corporate press releases. The reality is that apart from their own kindother self-proclaimed non-idiotsmost people find such arrogant and obnoxious debunkers and hardcore skeptics to be strangely angry and boorish, and often confrontational to the point of hysterical. However, when you strip down their whole mandate into its constituent parts, one soon finds that most of these scientifically minded crusaders have no actual accredited scientific background, and the entire thrust of their endeavours remains nothing less than unconditional servitude and unquestioned devotion to authority figures and the status quo. So what gives?
Principia Discordia | the book of Chaos, Discord and Confusion | Fnord! Apoptosis In contrast to necrosis, which is a form of traumatic cell death that results from acute cellular injury, in general apoptosis confers advantages during an organism's lifecycle. For example, the separation of fingers and toes in a developing human embryo occurs because cells between the digits apoptose. Unlike necrosis, apoptosis produces cell fragments called apoptotic bodies that phagocytic cells are able to engulf and quickly remove before the contents of the cell can spill out onto surrounding cells and cause damage.[5] Research in and around apoptosis has increased substantially since the early 1990s. In addition to its importance as a biological phenomenon, defective apoptotic processes have been implicated in an extensive variety of diseases. Excessive apoptosis causes atrophy, whereas an insufficient amount results in uncontrolled cell proliferation, such as cancer. Discovery and etymology[edit] German scientist Carl Vogt was first to describe the principle of apoptosis in 1842.
Elisabeth Kübler-Ross Elisabeth Kübler-Ross, M.D. (July 8, 1926 – August 24, 2004) was a Swiss American psychiatrist, a pioneer in near-death studies and the author of the groundbreaking book On Death and Dying (1969), where she first discussed her theory of the five stages of grief.[1] She is a 2007 inductee into the American National Women's Hall of Fame.[2] She was the recipient of twenty honorary degrees and by July 1982 had taught, in her estimation, 125,000 students in death and dying courses in colleges, seminaries, medical schools, hospitals, and social-work institutions.[3] In 1970, she delivered the The Ingersoll Lectures on Human Immortality at Harvard University, on the theme, On Death and Dying. Birth and education[edit] Elisabeth Kübler was born on July 8, 1926 in Zürich, Switzerland, one of triplets. During World War II she became involved in refugee relief work in Zürich and later visited Majdanek death camp. Personal life[edit] Academic career[edit] Healing Center[edit] AIDS work[edit] Death[edit]
Vampire Squid Economics: A Case Study in Full-Blown Wetiko Disease The following is Part Two of a series. Read Part One here. In Part One of this article, I contemplated a psycho-spiritual disease of the soul that I call malignant egophrenia and indigenous people call wetiko which is undermining the evolutionary development of our species. Wetiko/malignant egophrenia (heretofore referred to as wetiko) is nonlocal, in that it is an inner disease of the spirit, soul and psyche that explicates itself through the canvas of the outside world. Seen as a symbolic entity, the global financial system, for example, is the revelation of wetiko disease displayed graphically and schematically in its architecture, operations and overall design, so that anyone with a trained eye can discern the telltale signs and spore prints of this maleficent psycho-pathology getting down to business. The over-leveraged wetiko economy is a phantom menace,' in that there is hardly any real substantial value changing hands except in appearance.
Glean Learning Tools by The Public Learning Media Laboratory. Flynn effect Test score increases have been continuous and approximately linear from the earliest years of testing to the present. For the Raven's Progressive Matrices test, subjects born over a 100-year period were compared in Des Moines, Iowa, and separately in Dumfries, Scotland. Improvements were remarkably consistent across the whole period, in both countries.[1] This effect of an apparent increase in IQ has also been observed in various other parts of the world, though the rates of increase vary.[2] There are numerous proposed explanations of the Flynn effect, as well as some skepticism about its implications. Origin of term[edit] Rise in IQ[edit] IQ tests are updated periodically. Ulric Neisser estimates that using the IQ values of today the average IQ of the United States in 1932, according to the first Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scales standardization sample, was 80. Some studies have found the gains of the Flynn effect to be particularly concentrated at the lower end of the distribution.
The Five Stages of Grief - Elisabeth Kübler-Ross & David Kessler The stages have evolved since their introduction and they have been very misunderstood over the past three decades. They were never meant to help tuck messy emotions into neat packages. They are responses to loss that many people have, but there is not a typical response to loss as there is no typical loss. Our grief is as individual as our lives. The five stages, denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance are a part of the framework that makes up our learning to live with the one we lost. DENIALThis first stage of grieving helps us to survive the loss. ANGERAnger is a necessary stage of the healing process. BARGAININGBefore a loss, it seems like you will do anything if only your loved one would be spared. DEPRESSIONAfter bargaining, our attention moves squarely into the present. ACCEPTANCEAcceptance is often confused with the notion of being “all right” or “OK” with what has happened.