Frequently Asked Questions These FAQs are designed to provide a better understanding of Creative Commons, our licenses, and our other legal and technical tools. They provide basic information, sometimes about fairly complex topics, and will often link to more detailed information. Other CC FAQs: CC0 Public Domain Dedication and Public Domain Mark. "Licensor", "rights holder", "owner", and "creator" may be used interchangeably to refer to the person or entity applying a CC license. Information about the licenses is primarily made with reference to the 4.0 suite, but earlier license versions are mentioned where they differ. Have a question that isn't answered here? Creative Commons does not provide legal advice. Questions Most Frequently Asked Questions About CC General License Information For Licensors NB: You should never apply a CC license to a work unless you have all the permissions you need to do so. Choosing a license What can I license? Rights other than copyright Business models After licensing For Licensees Data
What does a free culture look like? - FreeCulture.org Wiki A free culture is one where critics don't just vote thumbs-up or thumbs-down on a movie but seriously discuss how a movie could be improved -- and then someone reads their critique and goes out and does it. [1] [2] A free culture is one where being a cover band doesn't lose you any street cred compared to doing your own music from scratch -- and where it starts to become hard to tell the difference. [3] A free culture is one where bad old TV series and movies turn into brilliant remakes and fan fiction on a regular basis -- and bad remakes and fan fiction themselves generate brilliant ones after a few years. A free culture is one where making a tribute to your favorite book or speculating on a logical continuation of an existing book is just as legal as mocking and satirizing a bad book you don't like. [4] A free culture is one where anyone who wants to can try to build a better mousetrap -- and the world beats a network of paths connecting everyone's front door.
Free culture/Culture libre (gratuite) C'est quoi la "Free culture" ? La Free culture correspond à la culture libre, appelée aussi le libre, qui s'appuie sur la notion de bien public et qui, de fait, est d'accès gratuit = libre = free. Musique Écoute libre Deezer : La majorité des titres en écoute sur ce site ont été fournis par les internautes eux-mêmes. L'écoute est gratuite et légale (en accord avec la SACEM). Il existe d'autres sites du même genre, mais certains sont encore en discussion/conflits avec la SACEM et organismes équivalents. Musique libre Sur ces sites, la musique est en écoute gratuite, et leur diffusion ne dépend pas des majors. Labels "équitables" Ces labels de musique en ligne vendent les créations d'artistes qui ont signé chez eux, à l'instar des grandes maisons de disque (EMI, Sony-BMG, Universal...). Selon les sites, l'écoute intégrale des albums avant leur achat est possible. Divers Les Artistes avec nous !! Un site officiel celui de Elliot Murphy : et puis :
About Creative Commons (CC) is an international nonprofit organization dedicated to helping build and sustain a thriving commons of shared knowledge and culture. Together with an extensive member network and multiple partners, we build capacity, we develop practical solutions, and we advocate for better open sharing of knowledge and culture that serves the public interest. As part of this work, we help overcome legal obstacles to the sharing of knowledge and creativity to address the world’s most pressing challenges. In order to achieve our mission, we: Learn more about CC through our mission and strategy and our collection of public reports and financials. For information about CC’s funding agreements, please see our Contributions Policy.
The Wind Done Gone The Wind Done Gone (2001) is the first novel written by Alice Randall. It was a bestselling historical novel that reinterprets the famous American novel Gone with the Wind (1936) by Margaret Mitchell. Plot summary[edit] The plot of Gone with the Wind revolves around a pampered Southern woman named Scarlett O'Hara, who lives through the American Civil War and Reconstruction. The Wind Done Gone is the same story, but told from the viewpoint of Cynara, a mulatto slave on Scarlett's plantation and the daughter of Scarlett's father and Mammy; the title is an African American Vernacular English sentence that might be rendered "The Wind Has Gone" in Standard American English. Cynara's name comes from the Ernest Dowson poem Non sum qualís eram bonae sub regno Cynarae, a line from which ("I have forgot much, Cynara! Sold from the O'Haras, Cynara eventually makes her way back to Atlanta and becomes the mistress of a white businessman. Characters[edit] Legal controversy[edit] References[edit]
Copyleft Un article de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre. Le symbole du copyleft, avec un C « inversé » (tourné à gauche), est l'« opposé » du copyright (C tourné à droite). En 2009, il n'est pas reconnu comme symbole légal. Le copyleft[Note 1] est l'autorisation donnée par l'auteur d'un travail soumis au droit d'auteur (œuvre d'art, texte, programme informatique ou autre) d'utiliser, d'étudier, de modifier et de diffuser son œuvre, dans la mesure où cette même autorisation reste préservée. L'auteur refuse donc que l'évolution possible de son travail soit accompagnée d'une restriction du droit à la copie, à l'étude, ou à de nouvelles évolutions. De ce fait, le contributeur apportant une modification (correction, ajout, réutilisation, etc.) est contraint de redistribuer ses propres contributions avec les mêmes libertés que l'original. Jeu de mots et traductions[modifier | modifier le code] Le terme copyleft est un jeu de mot construit par opposition au terme copyright. — Richard Stallman
Copyleft: Pragmatic Idealism by Richard Stallman Every decision a person makes stems from the person's values and goals. People can have many different goals and values; fame, profit, love, survival, fun, and freedom, are just some of the goals that a good person might have. When the goal is a matter of principle, we call that idealism. My work on free software is motivated by an idealistic goal: spreading freedom and cooperation. I want to encourage free software to spread, replacing proprietary software that forbids cooperation, and thus make our society better. That's the basic reason why the GNU General Public License is written the way it is—as a copyleft. Not everyone who uses the GNU GPL has this goal. “Sometimes I work on free software, and sometimes I work on proprietary software—but when I work on proprietary software, I expect to get paid.” If you want to accomplish something in the world, idealism is not enough—you need to choose a method that works to achieve the goal. Consider GNU C++.
Gratis versus libre An advertising mascot dressed as a mug of beer, holding a sign saying "Piwo gratis" (Polish for "free beer") in the centre of Kraków, Poland advertising beer being given away without cost. Lucha Libre is a form of freestyle wrestling and is "free" since it is comparatively unrestricted. Gratis versus libre is the distinction between two meanings of the English adjective "free"; namely, "for zero price" (gratis) and "with little or no restriction" (libre). The terms are largely used to categorise intellectual property, particularly computer programs, according to the licenses and legal restrictions that cover them, in the free software and open source communities, as well as the broader free culture movement. Richard Stallman summarised the difference in a slogan: "Think free as in free speech, not free beer Gratis[edit] Libre [edit] "Free beer" vs "free speech" distinction [edit] "Free software is a matter of liberty, not price. 1. See also[edit] [edit] References[edit] External links[edit]
Definition/It - Definition of Free Cultural Works Versione stabile Questa è la versione stabile 1.1 della definizione. Il numero di versione verrà aggiornato con lo sviluppo della definizione. La versione modificabile della definizione si trova su Definition/Unstable (in inglese). Si veda authoring process per maggiori informazioni, e translations se vuoi contribuire a una versione in una lingua differente. Riassunto[edit] Questo documento definisce le "Opere Culturali Libere" ("Free Cultural Works") come opere o espressioni che possono essere liberamente studiate, utilizzate, copiate e/o modificate da chiunque, per qualsiasi scopo. Preambolo[edit] I progressi sociali e tecnologici rendono possibile a una crescente parte dell'umanità di accedere, creare, modificare, pubblicare e distribuire vari tipi di opere - opere d'arte, materiali scientifici ed educativi, software, articoli - in breve: tutto ciò che può essere rappresentato in forma digitale. Identificare le Opere Culturali Libere[edit] Definire le Free Culture Licenses[edit]
Licences libres pour les logiciels Ce recueil de fiches de licences libres, de 54 pages en français, diffusé sous licence Creative Commons by-nc-nd, explique de façon synthétique la philosophie et les enjeux d’un échantillon de licences libres. Il n’a pas la vocation à être exhaustif mais analyse les licences libres les plus utilisées. L'analyse des licences est fait en suivant la méthode, en 9 étapes, expliquée dans le Guide d'approche et d'analyse des licences de logiciels libres v2.0. Ce guide est aussi diffusé sous licence Creative Commons by-nc-nd. Chaque fiche du recueil est structurée et résume la philosophie de la licence, ses particularités en matière de redistribution sous cette même licence et son régime de compatibilité avec d’autres licences (ou de changement de licence). Un tableau analyse de façon complète les différents éléments de la licence. Les points traités dans la classification :
Definition of Free Cultural Works Artlibre.org Students for Free Culture » Blog » Net Neutrality Demand better coverage of Net Neutrality Numerous stakeholders, watchdogs, and industry analysts have already commented on yesterday’s public disagreement between Comcast and Level 3 Communications. Let the FCC Hear Your Voice on Student-Led Innovation On the White House blog Tom Kalil and Aneesh Chopra are drawing attention to the role that students have in Your voice needed at FCC "net neutrality" workshop next week! ARPAnet Interface message processor (IMP), BBN, 1967 The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is considering adopting national rules to protect Student Voices in the P2P Provisions of the 2008 HEOA As you undoubtedly know, college campuses are, in many ways, ground zero for the battles being waged for the future Ask Not What Your Country Can Do For Free Culture… As you undoubtedly know, President Obama has led an unprecedented era of openness in American governance, and although the record Action Alert: Stop Copyright Filtering in Broadband Stimulus Well, crap, guys.
Licence Art Libre Un article de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre. Logo de la Licence Art Libre Description[modifier | modifier le code] Elle autorise tout tiers (personne physique ou morale), ayant accepté ses conditions, à procéder à la copie, la diffusion et la transformation d'une œuvre, comme à son exploitation gratuite ou commerciale, à condition qu'il soit toujours possible d'accéder à sa source pour la copier, la diffuser ou la transformer. Autrement dit, selon le principe d'une licence copyleft, les œuvres dérivées de l'original (modification, extension, incorporation…) doivent être également être diffusées avec une licence libre et copyleft. Elle a été rédigée en juillet 2000 grâce aux contributions de la liste de diffusion <copyleft_attitude Cette licence est consultable sur le site artlibre.org[2] ; elle est également disponible en anglais[3], en allemand[4], en espagnol[5], en italien[6] et en portugais[7]. Historique[modifier | modifier le code] Notes et références[modifier | modifier le code]