background preloader

Self-Efficacy

Self-Efficacy
This summary was written and compiled by Karin Kirk, SERC, and contains an overview of motivation research and pertinent references. Self efficacy is commonly defined as the belief in one's capabilities to achieve a goal or an outcome. Students with a strong sense of efficacy are more likely to challenge themselves with difficult tasks and be intrinsically motivated. These students will put forth a high degree of effort in order to meet their commitments, and attribute failure to things which are in their control, rather than blaming external factors. Self-efficacious students also recover quickly from setbacks, and ultimately are likely to achieve their personal goals. How can students gain self-efficacy? There are four sources of self-efficacy. Mastery experiences - Students' successful experiences boost self-efficacy, while failures erode it. Pedagogic strategies that foster self-efficacy Other pedagogies for improving self-efficacy include: Teaching Practices to Avoid Further reading

Current Directions in Self-efficacy Research by Frank Pajares Two decades have now passed since Bandura (1977) first introduced the construct of self-efficacy with the seminal publication of "Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change." A decade later, Bandura (1986) situated the construct within a social cognitive theory of human behavior that diverged from the prevalent cognitivism of the day and embedded cognitive development within a sociostructural network of influences. More recently, Bandura (1997) published Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control, in which he further situated self-efficacy within a theory of personal and collective agency that operates in concert with other sociocognitive factors in regulating human well-being and attainment. During these two decades, the tenets of the self-efficacy component of social cognitive theory have been widely tested in varied disciplines and settings and have received support from a growing body of findings from diverse fields. Sources of Self-efficacy Beliefs

Self Efficacy (What It Is and Why It Matters) When facing a challenge, do you feel like you can rise up and accomplish your goal or do you give up in defeat? Are you like the famous little train engine from the classic children's book ("I think I can, I think I can!), or do you doubt your own abilities to rise up and overcome the difficulties that life throws your way? Self-efficacy, or your belief in your own abilities to deal with various situations, can play a role in not only how you feel about yourself, but whether or not you successfully achieve your goals in life. The concept of self-efficacy is central to psychologist Albert Bandura’s social cognitive theory, which emphasizes the role of observational learning, social experience, and reciprocal determinism in the development of personality. According to Bandura, a person’s attitudes, abilities, and cognitive skills comprise what is known as the self-system. What Is Self-Efficacy? The Role of Self-Efficacy People with a strong sense of self-efficacy: Sources of Self-Efficacy 1.

Activity theory Introduction to Activity Theory applied to a work context The premise of activity theory is that a collective work activity, with the basic purpose shared by others (community), is undertaken by people (subjects) who are motivated by a purpose or towards the solution of a problem (object), which is mediated by tools and/or signs (artefacts or instruments) used in order to achieve the goal (outcome). The activity is constrained by cultural factors including conventions (rules) and social organisation (division of labour) within the immediate context and framed by broader social patterns (of production, consumption, distribution and exchange). Activity theory provides a conceptual framework from which we can understand the inter-relationship between activities, actions, operations and artefacts, subjects’ motives and goals, and aspects of the social, organisational and societal contexts within which these activities are framed. Example of application of Activity Theory in a TLRP project

Current Directions in Self-Efficacy Research Current Directions in Self-efficacy Research Frank Pajares Emory University In M. Two decades have now passed since Bandura (1977) first introduced the construct of self-efficacy with the seminal publication of "Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change." During these two decades, the tenets of the self-efficacy component of social cognitive theory have been widely tested in varied disciplines and settings and have received support from a growing body of findings from diverse fields. Self-efficacy beliefs have also received increasing attention in educational research, primarily in studies of academic motivation and of self-regulation (Pintrich & Schunk, 1995). Self-efficacy's broad application across various domains of behavior has accounted for its popularity in contemporary motivation research (Graham & Weiner, 1996). Self-beliefs and Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory - A Brief Overview Self-efficacy Component of Social Cognitive Theory Sources of Self-efficacy Beliefs

Self-efficacy cognitive affect Frank PajaresEmory University Social Cognitive Theory In 1941, Miller and Dollard proposed a theory of social learning and imitation that rejected behaviorist notions of associationism in favor of drive reduction principles. It was a theory of learning, however, that failed to take into account the creation of novel responses or the processes of delayed and non-reinforced imitations. In 1963, Bandura and Walters wrote Social Learning and Personality Development, broadening the frontiers of social learning theory with the now familiar principles of observational learning and vicarious reinforcement. With the publication of Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Bandura (1986) advanced a view of human functioning that accords a central role to cognitive, vicarious, self-regulatory, and self-reflective processes in human adaptation and change. Environments and social systems influence human behavior through psychological mechanisms of the self system.

Here’s How The World’s Most Brilliant Minds Scheduled Their Days Sources: RJ Andrews Infowetrust.com Mason Currey’s Daily Rituals: Developing Your Child's Self-Esteem Listen Healthy self-esteem is like a child's armor against the challenges of the world. Kids who know their strengths and weaknesses and feel good about themselves seem to have an easier time handling conflicts and resisting negative pressures. They tend to smile more readily and enjoy life. These kids are realistic and generally optimistic. In contrast, kids with low self-esteem can find challenges to be sources of major anxiety and frustration. What Is Self-Esteem? Self-esteem is similar to self-worth (how much a person values himself or herself). Self-esteem also can be defined as feeling capable while also feeling loved. Patterns of self-esteem start very early in life. So, it's wise to think about developing and promoting self-esteem during childhood. Parents and caregivers can promote healthy self-esteem by showing encouragement and enjoyment in many areas. Signs of Unhealthy and Healthy Self-Esteem Self-esteem fluctuates as kids grow.

Self-efficacy Affect on Human Agency by Albert Bandura from Social Foundations of Thought and Action, 1986 SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS AFFECT HUMAN AGENCY IN DIVERSE WAYS:Choice behaviorPeople tend to avoid engaging in a task where their efficacy is low, and generally undertake tasks where their efficacy is high. (p. 393) Accurate self-efficacy appraisal are important. The consequences are aversive for high-efficacy/low skill (irreparable harm) and restrictive (no growth) for low-efficacy/high skill. The efficacy judgments that are the most functional are probably those that slightly exceed what one can do at any given time. (p. 394) Effort expenditure and persistenceThe stronger the perceived self-efficacy, the more vigorous and persistent are people's their efforts. Self-efficacy judgments are related to action, but a number of factors can affect the strength of the relationship. "Perceived self-efficacy contributes to the development of subskills, as well as draws upon them in fashioning new behavior patterns" (p. 395).

Meditation and Neuroplasticity: Five key articles | Meditation Research Meditation not only changes our mind but also our brain – this is what more and more neuroscientific research suggests. Neuroplasticity – the change of brain structures as a result of experience – is considered to be one of the most important discoveries of neuroscience. Over the last 10 years evidence has been growing that not only the acquisition of navigational knowledge by London Taxi drivers (see video) or learning a new motor task like juggling (see article), but also meditation practice can lead to significant changes to brain structures. Here I respond to a recent request and list five key articles on that topic. Article 1: Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness To my knowledge this is the first study showing differences in brain structure between meditators and non-meditators. Lazar, S. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000186598.66243.19 Article 2: Long-term meditation is associated with increased gray matter density in the brain stem Luders, E., Toga, A.

The impact of labor force history on self-esteem and its component parts, anxiety, alienation and depression Psychologists Erikson (1959), Jahoda (1979, 1981, 1982) and Warr (1987) have offered theories to explain how experiences such as joblessness may lead to a decline in mental health. Other psychologists, including Rotter (1966) and Rosenberg (1965), have designed and validated survey instruments capable of measuring various aspects of emotional health including self-esteem. Using such construct measures the correlation between unemployment and self-esteem has been estimated. Unfortunately, the accuracy of these estimates is marred by three statistical problems: omitted variables, unobserved heterogeneity, and data selection. Therefore, the failure of a consensus to emerge regarding the impact of unemployment on self-esteem is not surprising. This paper offers new estimates of the relation between unemployment and self-esteem using a methodology that controls for the three potential sources of bias identified.

Definition of Efficacy Efficacy is the capacity to produce an effect. It has different specific meanings in different fields. In medicine, it is the ability of an intervention or drug to produce a desired effect. Context[edit] Medicine[edit] In medicine, efficacy indicates the capacity for beneficial change (or therapeutic effect) of a given intervention (e.g. a drug, medical device, surgical procedure, or a public health intervention). When talking in terms of efficacy vs. effectiveness, effectiveness relates to how well a treatment works in the practice of medicine, as opposed to efficacy, which measures how well treatment works in clinical trials or laboratory studies.[1] Pharmacology[edit] In pharmacology, efficacy (Emax) refers to the maximum response achievable from a drug.[2] Intrinsic activity is a relative term that describes a drug's efficacy relative to a drug with the highest observed efficacy. Lighting[edit] Insolvency[edit] Lutheranism[edit] Difference amplifiers[edit] See also[edit] References[edit]

18 Things Highly Creative People Do Differently This list has been expanded into the new book, “Wired to Create: Unravelling the Mysteries of the Creative Mind,” by Carolyn Gregoire and Scott Barry Kaufman. Creativity works in mysterious and often paradoxical ways. Creative thinking is a stable, defining characteristic in some personalities, but it may also change based on situation and context. Inspiration and ideas often arise seemingly out of nowhere and then fail to show up when we most need them, and creative thinking requires complex cognition yet is completely distinct from the thinking process. Neuroscience paints a complicated picture of creativity. And psychologically speaking, creative personality types are difficult to pin down, largely because they’re complex, paradoxical and tend to avoid habit or routine. While there’s no “typical” creative type, there are some tell-tale characteristics and behaviors of highly creative people. They daydream. According to Kaufman and psychologist Rebecca L. They observe everything.

The Self-Esteem Movement Backfires — When Praise is Dangerous The self-esteem movement has transformed much of America, but this is perhaps nowhere more evident than in the schools. A brilliant article in New York Magazine provides a fascinating glimpse into why the movement is crashing and burning. As writer Po Bronson explains: Since the 1969 publication of The Psychology of Self-Esteem, in which Nathaniel Branden opined that self-esteem was the single most important facet of a person, the belief that one must do whatever he can to achieve positive self-esteem has become a movement with broad societal effects. Author Melanie Phillips offered a devastating critique of the movement in her book All Must Have Prizes. Surely, in the immortal words of John McEnroe, they cannot be serious? Their new idea for boosting examination success is to abolish the very idea of failure, along with the difference between the right and the wrong answer to a question. That was in Britain, but the same trends are fully present on this side of the Atlantic. More:

How to Stop the Negative Voices in Your Head from Ruling Your Life March 20, 2014 | Like this article? Join our email list: Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email. Loser! Sound familiar? It’s that know-it-all, bullying, mean-spirited committee in your head. We all have voices inside our heads commenting on our moment-to-moment experiences, the quality of our past decisions, mistakes we could have avoided, and what we should have done differently. Some psychologists believe these are residues of childhood experiences—automatic patterns of neural firing stored in our brains that are dissociated from the memory of the events they are trying to protect us from. If left unchecked, the committees in our heads will take charge of our lives and keep us stuck in mental and behavioral prisons of our own making. The Schema Therapy Approach Psychologist Jeffrey Young and his colleagues call these rigid rules of living and views of the world made by the committee in our heads “schemas.” We behave in ways that maintain them.

Related: