background preloader

Sociotechnical system

Sociotechnical system
Sociotechnical systems (STS) in organizational development is an approach to complex organizational work design that recognizes the interaction between people and technology in workplaces. The term also refers to the interaction between society's complex infrastructures and human behaviour. In this sense, society itself, and most of its substructures, are complex sociotechnical systems. Sociotechnical systems pertains to theory regarding the social aspects of people and society and technical aspects of organizational structure and processes. Overview[edit] Sociotechnical refers to the interrelatedness of social and technical aspects of an organization. One is that the interaction of social and technical factors creates the conditions for successful (or unsuccessful) organizational performance. Therefore sociotechnical theory is about joint optimization,[3] that is, designing the social system and technical system in tandem so that they work smoothly together. Principles[edit] 18. Related:  Thesis - Exploration of Value

Disruptive innovation Sustaining innovations are typically innovations in technology, whereas disruptive innovations cause changes to markets. For example, the automobile was a revolutionary technological innovation, but it was not a disruptive innovation, because early automobiles were expensive luxury items that did not disrupt the market for horse-drawn vehicles. The market for transportation essentially remained intact until the debut of the lower priced Ford Model T in 1908. The current theoretical understanding of disruptive innovation is different from what might be expected by default, an idea that Clayton M. The work of Christensen and others during the 2000s has addressed the question of what firms can do to avoid displacement brought on by technological disruption. History and usage of the term[edit] The term disruptive technologies was coined by Clayton M. The theory[edit] Christensen defines a disruptive innovation as a product or service designed for a new set of customers. See also[edit]

Systems thinking Impression of systems thinking about society[1] A system is composed of interrelated parts or components (structures) that cooperate in processes (behavior). Natural systems include biological entities, ocean currents, the climate, the solar system and ecosystems. Designed systems include airplanes, software systems, technologies and machines of all kinds, government agencies and business systems. Systems Thinking has at least some roots in the General System Theory that was advanced by Ludwig von Bertalanffy in the 1940s and furthered by Ross Ashby in the 1950s. Systems thinking has been applied to problem solving, by viewing "problems" as parts of an overall system, rather than reacting to specific parts, outcomes or events and potentially contributing to further development of unintended consequences. Systems science thinking attempts to illustrate how small catalytic events that are separated by distance and time can be the cause of significant changes in complex systems.

Modernization Science: The Principles and Methods of National Advancement - Chuanqi He Political economy In the late 19th century, the term economics came to replace political economy, coinciding with the publication of an influential textbook by Alfred Marshall in 1890.[1] Earlier, William Stanley Jevons, a proponent of mathematical methods applied to the subject, advocated economics for brevity and with the hope of the term becoming "the recognised name of a science."[2][3] Etymology[edit] In the United States, political economy first was taught at the College of William and Mary, where in 1784, Smith's The Wealth of Nations was a required textbook.[5] Current approaches[edit] In its contemporary meaning, political economy refers to different, but related, approaches to studying economic and related behaviours, ranging from the combination of economics with other fields to the use of different, fundamental assumptions that challenge earlier economic assumptions: Related disciplines[edit] See also[edit] Notes[edit]

AVID Leadership Dr. Sandy Husk, Chief Executive Officer Dr. As superintendent of Salem-Keizer Public Schools in Oregon, her leadership resulted in the implementation of a districtwide strategic plan with an accountability system for all schools and departments. Prior to Salem-Keizer Public Schools, Sandy served five years as the director of schools for the Clarksville-Montgomery County School System in Clarksville, Tennessee. Sandy earned her Ph.D. in Administration, Curriculum & Supervision from the University of Colorado, Denver; her M.A. in Guidance and Counseling from the University of Colorado, Boulder; and her B.S. in Elementary Education from the University of Georgia, Athens. top Robert Gira – Executive Vice President, Quality, Communications, and Research Rob joined AVID Center in 1994 and is currently responsible for overseeing AVID Center's research, communications, and quality teams. Michelle Mullen – Executive Vice President, Curriculum and Learning Mark S. Granger B. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr.

Technology transfer and modernization Technique- or technology-transfer is based in many ways on technological and economic paths that were often created by European colonization and have been intensified by Industrialization and Globalization. On the one hand, the modern age is a constantly developing planetary truth, a truth that impacts every society in the world. On the other hand, societies in third world countries have not produced this condition themselves because modernity is an external imposition. This means the modern age turns to be an unavoidable destiny for them. Traditional modernization and technology transfer abstract from almost all contextual factors. That is why technological development and modernization are being compared across continents and assessed with more or less value, not considering the cultural and social contextual circumstances. I. Innovative technological development is a part of modernization since the late 18th century in Europe (Irrgang, 2002b). II. III.

Robert Reich Robert Bernard Reich (/ˈraɪʃ/;[1] born June 24, 1946) is an American political economist, professor, author, and political commentator. He served in the administrations of Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter and was Secretary of Labor under President Bill Clinton from 1993 to 1997. Reich was born with multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, also known as Fairbanks disease, and as a result stands 4 feet 10.5 inches tall. Until 2012, he was married to British-born lawyer, Clare Dalton, with whom he has two sons, Sam and Adam. [2] Reich is currently Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley. He has published 14 books, including the best-sellers The Work of Nations, Reason, Supercapitalism, Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future, and a best-selling e-book, Beyond Outrage. Early life and career[edit] From 1973 to 1974 he served as law clerk to Judge Frank M. From 1980 until 1992, Reich taught at the John F.

Systems Thinking © Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC. Adapted from the Field Guide to Consulting and Organizational Development and Field Guide to Consulting and Organizational Development with Nonprofits. Three of the biggest breakthroughs in how we understand and successfully guide changes in ourselves, others and organizations are systems theory, systems thinking and systems tools. To understand how they are used, we first must understand the concept of a system. Many of us have an intuitive understanding of the concept. However, we need to make that intuition even more explicit in order to use systems thinking and systems tools. Sections of This Topic Include Basics -- Definitions - - - What's a System? Also seeRelated Library Topics Also See the Library's Blogs Related to Systems Theory, Chaos Theory and Systems Thinking Definitions: Systems, Systems Theory, Systems Thinking, Tools What's a System? Systems range from simple to complex. A pile of sand is not a system.

Modernization as a Form of Cultural Adaptation to the Environment Modernization as a Form of Cultural Adaptation to the Environment Napoleon Wolanski Each change can be progressive. This is rather a matter of public opinion, the evaluation of this fact. Material culture has a practical beginning, as this was a production of the primitive tools. It is not univocal which elements of culture are old-fashioned and which are modern, or which are regressive and which are progressive. Nouveaux riches and parvenus take fashion for progress and modernization. Modernization in the contemporary European and North-American civilization is associated with the elements of urbanization and industrialization processes. Modernization should be associated with the comfort of life. It is important not to oppose modernization to tradition. Evolution and Civilization According to the present state of knowledge the humanization processes occurred in savannas of southern Africa over millions of years ago. Some social changes accounted for large cultural changes. Contd...