background preloader

Dispensationalism

Dispensationalism

Some Thoughts on Dispensationalism from a Class on Dispensationalism Today we finished a 15-week course on Dispensationalism at The Master’s Seminary. This was a Th.M. course with a roundtable-discussion format (actually our table was rectangular but you get the idea). The students and I worked through several books both pro and con about Dispensationalism. I do not want to speak for everyone in the class but I want to offer some general observations about how the class viewed Dispensationalism. Dispensationalism has undergone significant developments throughout the years but Dispensationalism has a core set of beliefs that have remained stable, namely: (1) historical-grammatical hermeneutics should be applied to all aspects of Scripture including both testaments; (2) the NT does not reinterpret the OT; (3) OT promises and covenants that have not been fulfilled yet must be literally fulfilled in the future; and (4) there will be both a salvation and restoration of the nation Israel in the future.

The Nut LA Biographia Evangelica The Resolutions of Jonathan Edwards Being sensible that I am unable to do anything without God’s help, I do humbly entreat him by his grace to enable me to keep these Resolutions, so far as they are agreeable to his will, for Christ’s sake. Remember to read over these Resolutions once a week. Overall Life Mission1 1. Resolved, that I will do whatsoever I think to be most to God’s glory, and my own good, profit and pleasure, in the whole of my duration, without any consideration of the time, whether now, or never so many myriad’s of ages hence. Good Works 11. Time Management 5. Relationships 14. Suffering 9. Character 8. Spiritual Life Assurance 25. The Scriptures 28. Prayer 29. The Lord’s Day 38. Vivification of Righteousness 30. Mortification of Sin and Self Examination 23. Communion with God 53. 1 The subheadings and categorization are suggested by Matt Perman to increase the readability. ©2014 Desiring God Foundation. Please include the following statement on any distributed copy: By John Piper. ©2014 Desiring God Foundation.

A Comparison of Three Systems undefined Dispensationalism - Covenant Theology - New Covenant Theology by Donald Hochner There are three main systems of interpreting Scriptures that are the most prevalant in the Christian Church today: Dispensationalism, Covenant Theology and New Covenant Theology. [DISP] May be Arminian or modified Calvinist. *There is an unfortunate tendancy to translated the word "ecclesia" with the word church, when it can very well be translated "assembly", which would make more sense in the OT version of it. [NCT] Same as Dispensationalism. *We think some of the old Dispensationalists did believe in a Covenant of Redemption within the Trinity, but we are not sure and I don't know about the new modified Dispensationalists. [CT] The eternal Covenant of Redemption was within the Trinity to effect election. *I don't know if I would agree with that, and this may be a caricature on my part, as I'm not 100% sure about this. [CT] No man has ever been saved by works, but only by grace. Back to Home Page

alicexz (Alice X. Zhang) on deviantART Affirmation 2010 Gordon Fee: How Should We Read the Bible? J. Michael Feazell: Welcome to You’re Included, the unique interview series devoted to practical implications of Trinitarian theology. Christians the world over look to the Bible as their guide to faith and practice. Yet from the inception of the church, there has been much disagreement over how to interpret what the Scriptures say. Gordon Fee: Glad to be here again. JMF: It will be a help to all of us to hear a little of the background of how you came to write How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth. GF: I’m a little old now, in terms of all the details, okay? And at the end of this series, there must have been a group of about 35 people, adults who had been sitting in the sessions, and the common denominator of their question was, Why have we never heard this before? JMF: And you had known Doug for… GF: We were colleagues. I had chosen Zondervan for some other reasons that aren’t necessary here, but we had a former student who was actually working as an editor at Zondervan. GF: Yeah.

Related: