background preloader

Tout sur la Chine

Tout sur la Chine

Rationalité Limitée LES COULOIRS DE BERCY Le gouvernement va démissionner demain et Bercy va se retrouver orphelin. Voici quelques questions auxquelles François Hollande devra répondre avant de nommer le ou les successeurs de François Baroin et Valérie Pécresse. Mes réponses ou hypothèses ne sont que pure conjecture. Combien de Bercy? Quand il est arrivé au pouvoir, en 2007, Nicolas Sarkozy a voulu « casser la forteresse » en créant deux ministères à Bercy: l’un pour l’Economie, l’autre pour les Comptes publics. Cette dichotomie a été beaucoup critiquée, y compris à droite. François Hollande va devoir répondre à plusieurs questions avant de trouver le ou les nouveau(x) locataire(s) de Bercy (Photo: Reuters) Quel profil politique? Quel signal donner à l’Europe? Quel casting, alors?

L'ami du laissez-faire ataxingmatter In Part I, I outlined some of the many ways in which the U.S. provides favorable treatment to religious institutions and/or their representatives, including income exclusions from the federal income tax for ministers that are unavailable to any other occupation. In this Part II, I want to consider how the corporatization of religion relates to increased politicization of religious fundamentalism in recent decades and the religious right's incessant push to influence public policies. Then in Part III I will return to the uneasy juncture of religious freedom claims and taxation. A caveat. Think about Abe Lincoln as described in this US News article (Dan Gilgoff, Abraham Lincoln's Religious Uncertainty, US News, Feb. 12, 2009). Remember Kennedy's candidacy in 1960, and the real concern that his Catholicism might cost him the election. These [concerns outlined above] are the real issues which should decide this campaign. Megachurch and televangelist ministers gross enormous salaries.

Ecopublix Across the Curve The Adam Smith Institute Blog Ezra Klein has launched his new site, Vox.com, with an essay on ‘how politics makes us stupid’. The piece is provocative, and Klein uses some interesting examples. Most striking is the study that shows that people’s maths skills get worse when the problem they’re dealing with has a political element and goes against their political instincts. The basic claim is that people engage in ‘motivated reasoning’ when they think about politics – in other words, they think in order to justify what they already believe, not in order to discover the truth. This ‘identity-protective cognition’, as he calls it, makes sense – a pundit who decides that the other side is right about some particular political issue (Klein uses global warming as an example) has a lot to lose in terms of status within the group they’re part of, and little to gain by being right. Even though that might seem plausible, I think he is assuming too much and is wrong about some of the phenomena he identifies.

Adam Smith Lives! The Janet Prindle Institute for Ethics at DePauw University is sponsoring an Undergraduate Ethics Symposium April 8-10, 2010. This conference is shaped around a series of workshops in which students present to one another their best work on a subject of ethical concern. I write to invite you to encourage your faculty to bring this event to the attention of their students. The students whose works are accepted for the symposium will benefit from the critiques and comments of their peers in the seminar, and also from the visiting scholar or creative writer who will direct the workshop. This is an honors symposium, and those students whose works are received by the February 1 deadline and accepted for inclusion in the conference program by panels of DePauw faculty members will have all of their expenses paid for the conference. Sincerely, Martha Rainbolt Coordinator, Janet Prindle Institute for Ethics

Real Time Economics China’s GDP growth fell in the first quarter to its slowest pace since September of 2012, slipping to 7.4% on-year growth from 7.7% the in the fourth quarter. The increase was slightly higher than economists’ expectations of a 7.3% gain. Authorities released other data that suggested continuing weakness, but not at a quickening pace. Industrial production grew 8.8% on year in March below expectations of 9% but up from an average 8.6% expansion in January and February, combined to limit distortions from the Lunar New Year holidays. Fixed-asset investment, meanwhile, slipped to 17.6% on year in the first quarter from 17.9% growth in the first two months. Markets rose on the data, with both the Shanghai and Hong Kong stock markets clicking higher. Some economists saw a massaging of the GDP figures.

Economist's View Daniel W. Drezner | FOREIGN POLICY Econbrowser Economic Dreams - Economic Nightmares I spent most of my working life in the US Forest Service, battling fundamentalism. Most of the battles dealt with economics. My first job was to coordinate use of a linear programming model (FORPLAN) in the development of forest plans. The model may (or may not) have been useful in projecting overall timber sales volumes from big-timber forests, but to have used it as an overall planning model was a mistake. Forests are not factories. Multiple uses for timber, recreation, wildlife, minerals and oil and gas, livestock grazing (and so on) must be carefully balanced against preservation and conservation efforts in the dynamic self-organizing systems that we call Nature—forest and grasslands in particular. I remember one day in 1979, before I joined the Forest Service, having lunch with FORPLAN developer K. The FORPLAN Fiasco During the early years of US Forest Service "forest planning" (1979-1985, generally) there was a big problem with what we then called "analytical determinism."

Related: