background preloader

Marque sera utile ou ne sera pas

Marque sera utile ou ne sera pas
« Une marque sera utile ou ne sera pas » Publié le 13 janvier 2010 Un consommateur impliqué, des marques utiles et une vraie interactivité entre les deux : voilà le monde qui se dessine selon une étude Euro RSCG effectuée en France, Grande Bretagne et aux USA. On ne vous apprendra rien, notre planète est en crise. Mais s'agit-il du début d'une nouvelle ère, ou juste un mauvais moment à passer ? Et si le mot qui décrit le mieux leur état d'esprit est celui d'inquiétude comme pour leurs voisins, c'est surtout celui de révolte et d'injustice, qui correspond au plus près à leur état d'esprit (39% contre 22% en Grande Bretagne et 30% aux USA). Alors comment les marques doivent-elles réagir ? L'étude révèle trois phénomènes : - Tout d'abord, on assiste à un réinvestissement de la consommation et pas à une mise à distance. 45% des Français pensent que les marques ont contribué à améliorer leur quotidien et à élever la qualité de vie. Adieu donc au « dialogue pour le dialogue ». Isabelle Musnik

The secrets of successful digital branding - iMediaConnection.co Social networking is as old as time. But starting and continuing a conversation isn't always second nature to digital marketers; particularly those who are used to the one-way media conversations of old. But there are some proven strategies that have pushed brands to new levels of consumer relationship success. Anne Murray, the digital champion of one such brand, Southwest Airlines, spoke with iMedia to share her views on essential campaign components, driving demand through social media, and what resources need to be in place for a digital campaign to succeed. Anne Murray is an industry leading brand marketer and digital champion. iMedia Connection: In your opinion, what are the three most essential components for launching a new campaign? Anne Murray: My advice is to begin with the end result in mind and define the successful outcome you are trying to achieve. iMedia: During your tenure at Southwest Airlines, the company really made a name for itself in terms of digital branding.

What Matters Now: get the free ebook [Update! Now available in a print edition, all proceeds to Room to Read. Thanks Bernie!] Now, more than ever, we need to shake things up. Now, more than ever, we need a different way of thinking, a useful way to focus and the energy to turn the game around. I hope a new ebook I've organized will get you started on that path. Here are more than seventy big thinkers, each sharing an idea for you to think about as we head into the new year. Here's the deal: it's free. Have fun. Here's a lens with all the links plus an astonishing array of books by our authors. NEW BONUS: A different coop ebook, (click for free download) this time with contributions from authors that include JC Hutchins, Cory Doctorow, Joseph Finder and Chris Brogan.

2013 : l'année de la Brand Utility - AGENCE Quel bilan faites-vous de cette année digitale et quelle tonalité aura 2013 ? Matthieu de Lesseux : Les enjeux liés au digital sont profonds et lourds pour les marques mais ce qui est fondamental pour elles, c’est l’expérience client. Aujourd’hui, une expérience client passe bien entendu par un bon surf sur un site, par une bonne page Facebook, mais, de plus en plus, par de nouveaux services digitaux. Au regard des grandes réussites des « pure players » comme voyages-sncf, Amazon ou Google, les marques ont pris conscience que la "brand utility" pouvait être un levier de croissance pour elles demain. La brand utility est la tendance clef. En effet, certaines marques n’ont pas la bonne gouvernance, elles subissent une organisation en départements et des processus de travail trop séquentiels. Facebook vient de changer ses règles en demandant aux marques de passer aux posts payants pour toucher tous leurs fans. Depuis dix ans, si on veut apparaitre sur Google, on achète des mots clefs.

Why Aren’t There More Iconic Millennial Brands? | Millennial Mar Is Colbert a brand icon for Gen Y? I was recently asked, “what question would I most want to ask Millennials?” As a professional market researcher it’s easy to answer: my biggest question is how they relate to brands. More specifically, I am curious why there aren’t more Millennial-specific ‘iconic’ brands? Gen Y likes pretty much the same brands everyone likes — Coca-Cola, Apple, Trader Joe’s, Nike, Vogue, Facebook, Google, Zappos, etc. Brands are relationships. Let me first define what I mean by ‘brand icon’. Cultural icons are exemplary symbols that people accept as shorthand to represent important ideas. By this standard, very few brands, if any, qualify as ‘icons’ for Millennials. The only other brands I can think of that meet Holts’ qualification for iconic status for Gen Y are people brands. The Emmy- and Peabody-winning satirist, author of I Am America (And So Can You!) Brand marketers aspiring to be iconic Millennial brands could do well to study, Obama, Stewart and Colbert.

Neuromarketing Hope and Hype: 5 Brands Conducting Brain Research | Integrated Branding Even before the age of Mad Men marketers were trying to tap into the human subconscious to influence consumers to buy their products. But over the last decade or so, as the fields of neuroscience and marketing science (as some like to call it) have evolved, the area of Neuromarketing has emerged. Today more companies are investing in the technology and studies. Neuromarketing blogs (Roger Dooley) and books (Buyology) are being accorded more attention and legitimacy. What is Neuromarketing? Neuromarketing is the practice of using technology to measure brain activity in consumer subjects in order to inform the development of products and communications--really to inform the brand's 4Ps. It is commonly accepted that traditional market research is flawed because consumers don't know, can't articulate, or will even lie in a focus group about their purchase motivations. So who is using neuromarketing (aside from consultants)? Neuromarketing is only poised to grow in use and influence.

Consommation collaborative et marques : quelle nouvelle donne? | Isabelle Milgrom est consultante en marketing, elle s’intéresse à la consommation collaborative et notamment à la façon dont les marques s’adaptent à ces évolutions des comportements. Elle a écrit un article de synthèse, il nous a semblé intéressant de le reprendre ici . La consommation collaborative monte en puissance et challenge fortement la consommation de masse. Un pouvoir d’achat en berne et moult dépenses contraintes en augmentation (essence, énergie domestique) ou en émergence (internet, téléphone portable…) amènent les individus à trouver d’autres solutions et notamment à privilégier l’accès, l’usage à la possession. La consommation collaborative n’est en tout cas plus du tout un phénomène marginal réservé à des utopistes soixante-huitards ou des bobos en quête de sens. Alors que peuvent faire les marques face à ces nouveaux paradigmes ? Mais pour des fabricants de yogourts ou de crème de soin, laparticipation à l’économie du partage semble plus compliquée.

The sea change in brand management within the social media The title of this blog post took me a long time to figure out, and it still seems a bit off. Simply put, the social media rewards value and service, and devalues self promotion and advertising. Up to now, most social media marketing methods simply wrap traditional push marketing methods into a new package. The following slideshow describes how to create a new local media brand that leverages the many channels of the social media. Social media reinforces the concept of branding because your brand is judged by what you do and who you are online. Chanel's luxury dream is turning to dust | Opinion The world of luxury branding is one of great paradox. It is a place where tradition and creativity collide. Where ancient founders and youthful models meet and make magic together. Where impoverished artisans rise to become emperors of incredible fortunes. For marketers, the world of luxury holds a special place because it represents the origin of brand management. Among those great names, few shine brighter than Gabrielle “Coco” Chanel. As a lover of brands and someone who has worked for a decade for some of the biggest luxury houses as a consultant, I always gain inspiration from a local Church of Chanel. Its shop windows lack inspiration, the new collections are a little too derivative and the clientele looks older to me on each visit. Of all the criticisms you can level at a luxury brand, dusty is perhaps the most devilish. And to accuse Chanel, of all the luxury brands, of being dusty is tantamount to betrayal. The film industry has certainly not helped.

Verbe, reverb et d'amplifier: raconter marque storiessmithery | smithery I was thinking about reverb today. What’s reverb? Well, it’s short for reverberation, and it’s defined beautifully in Wikipedia as follows: “Reverberation is the persistence of sound in a particular space after the original sound is removed” It occurs naturally in spaces where there are surfaces for the original sound to bounce off, replaying again and again. Back to Wikipedia: “Reverberation is many thousands of echoes in quick succession” In such quick succession, in fact, that unlike what you traditionally think of as echoes (Echo… cho… cho.. ch…), they all blend in to one. But it tails off pretty quickly; the length of reverberation will be proportional to the size of the room and surfaces to bounce off, and inversely proportional to the amount of absorption present that prevents the sound bouncing further. What does it sound like? Well, you’ll all know the distinctive sound of The XX from just about every BBC trail over the last year… it’s the trailing echo after every guitar note…

20% of tweets about brands Is the result of a Penn State study in the States. Researchers led by Jim Jansen, associate professor of information science and technology, and Twitter chief scientist Abdur Chowdhury looked at half a million tweets. 20% of them were apparently people 'asking and providing' product information. Assuming three million tweets a day, that would translate into 600k posts daily of direct relevance to brands. I initially found that % on the high side, though 'providing product information' is a definition that's wide enough to include any tweets about a product or service - I went to this restaurant today, I bought this mobile phone and so on. I guess it is true that as a personal broadcasting system we do use Twitter to talk about stuff we buy or like / dislike a great deal. Case in point I've - almost unconsciously - made some kind of comment about four different companies since the weekend.

Related: