THE ANOMALIST Ghosts I've always got a kick how people will fall reverently silent and consider you blessed if you say you saw an angel or some "vision", but if you tell those same people you saw a ghost they'd tell you how full of it you were. Is there a difference? I sat in the library for 9 solid hours one day (heaven!), looking at every ghost book they had; "psychic photography", famous hauntings, the haunted; the stupid-ass "ectoplasm" photos of long-ago Mediums, badly faked portraits of spirit photography, the psychology and physiology behind those who claim demonic possession, EVP, infrared ghost photos, Near Death experiences. I reread all the yellowed books of a "famous" ghost hunter and remembered even as a kid realizing what a liar he was. Maybe not. But - I know better. Hopefully I can share some of the latter here, but those debunking stories make good reading, too. Any good ghost stuff, Emaill me.
Quantum woo Quantum woo is the justification of irrational beliefs by an obfuscatory reference to quantum physics. Buzzwords like "energy field", "probability wave", or "wave-particle duality" are used to magically turn thoughts into something tangible in order to directly affect the universe. This results in such foolishness as the Law of Attraction or quantum healing. When an idea seems too crazy to believe, the proponent often makes an appeal to quantum physics as the explanation. Quantum woo is an attempt to piggy-back on the success and legitimacy of science by claiming quack ideas are rooted in accepted concepts in physics, combined with utter misunderstanding of these concepts and a sense of wonder at the amazing magic these misunderstandings would imply if true. Proponents of quantum woo are affected by the interaction of neural-energy and their natural bozon field, which results in the creation of one moron and the decay of two neurons. [edit] History [edit] Material that skirts the edge
PARAseek.com - The Paranormal Search Engine LibraryGhost - Powered by courierpress.com Scientists of America : Science of anyone - Web edition "Entity/Rods/UFO'S" "Entity/Rods/UFO'S" "Entity In Action" in Palm Springs, CA. in 2000 Lots of new images, showing Etheric Energy/ Life Forms/ Quite Clearly @ the last page.More to come !!!!!! 2 Frames later/Same Object as prior Picture "Poetry In Motion"over 40' Roof Top UFO/Craft? "Wow!! "Bat Wing" shape(Frame#1) More than 70' away, over roof top "Bat Wing" entity changing shape "GoodBye" it said as it shot past. "Disc/Winged Shaped" craft/entity The roof top is over seventy feet away.Isn't it beautiful? "Incredible Inter-Dimensional /Solar Entity" #1 "Frame#1/ followed by Frame#2 on next frame" "Inter-Dimensional Entity" Frame#2 "Shot on April 25th 2000" in Minnetonka, MN.
Top 10 Best Ghost Photographs While trying to decide which ghost photos are the “best” is largely an exercise in subjectivity, it’s difficult to know which ones are the best with any degree of objectivity. These are the photos I consider the most authentic “captures” of ghosts ever caught on film, but I leave it to you to decide for yourself how real they may be. Of course, I realize that almost any photo can be hoaxed, but many of these were taken many years or even decades before digital cameras and the advent of Photoshop and other photo manipulation software came on the scene, making them somewhat more difficult to fake than it would be today. 10. Taken in 1946 in Queensland, Australia by a mother who was taking a picture of her teenage daughter’s grave. 9. This famous photo taken in 1924 apparently shows the faces of two recently deceased crewmen appearing in the waves alongside the merchant ship S.S. 8. 7. 6. Taken by Reverend R.S. 5. 4. 3. 2. When visiting her mother’s grave in 1959, Mrs. 1. J.
List of topics characterized as pseudoscience - Wikipedia This is a list of topics that have, either currently or in the past, been characterized as pseudoscience by academics or researchers. Detailed discussion of these topics may be found on their main pages. These characterizations were made in the context of educating the public about questionable or potentially fraudulent or dangerous claims and practices—efforts to define the nature of science, or humorous parodies of poor scientific reasoning. Criticism of pseudoscience, generally by the scientific community or skeptical organizations, involves critiques of the logical, methodological, or rhetorical bases of the topic in question.[1] Though some of the listed topics continue to be investigated scientifically, others were only subject to scientific research in the past and today are considered refuted, but resurrected in a pseudoscientific fashion. Many adherents or practitioners of the topics listed here dispute their characterization as pseudoscience. Physical sciences Earth sciences
Jeff Rense Program Paranormal Phenomena Fringe science - Wikipedia Inquiries far outside of mainstream science A concept that was once accepted by the mainstream scientific community may become fringe science because of a later evaluation of previous research.[5] For example, focal infection theory, which held that focal infections of the tonsils or teeth are a primary cause of systemic disease, was once considered to be medical fact. It has since been dismissed because of lack of evidence. Description[edit] The boundary between fringe science and pseudoscience is disputed. Although most fringe science is rejected, the scientific community has come to accept some portions of it.[2]: 172 One example of such is plate tectonics, an idea which had its origin in the fringe science of continental drift and was rejected for decades.[2]: 5 The confusion between science and pseudoscience, between honest scientific error and genuine scientific discovery, is not new, and it is a permanent feature of the scientific landscape .... Examples[edit] Historical[edit] Books