Manipulation et gestion de données — Bibliothèques Universitaires
Besoin de rédiger un plan de gestion de données, de publier une bibliographie interactive, de constituer un corpus documentaire, d’enrichir ou de nettoyer un jeu de données ? Les BU accompagnent la manipulation et la gestion des données utilisées et produites dans le cadre d’activités de recherche. Un service évolutif Voir la plaquette présentant les services à la recherche Ce service sera déployé progressivement à partir de janvier 2016. Son périmètre sera susceptible d’évoluer en fonction des besoins identifiés. Il s’adresse à tous les enseignants-chercheurs, chercheurs, doctorants, techniciens ou ingénieurs travaillant dans un laboratoire de l’université, quelle que soit la nature de leur projet (collectif ou individuel).Nous proposons une aide pour : Identifier et utiliser de données produites par des tiers,Manipuler et traiter des données,Gérer et mettre en valeur les données produites. La réalisation de traitement de données et de métadonnées est proposée à titre expérimental. Limites
Politiques nationales et européennes
Textes fondateurs du mouvement de l’Open Access : De la recommandation à l’obligation, les textes rédigés en faveur d’une politique de libre-accès des résultats et données de la recherche issus de fonds publics se multiplient dans le monde entier. Le terme « mandat », fréquemment utilisé, désigne les dispositions prises, qu’elles soient obligatoires ou non, afin que les auteurs de documents scientifiques les déposent en libre-accès. Le répertoire ROARMAP recense les politiques adoptées dans le monde par les universités et organismes de recherche (exemple des universités de Liège et Minho qui ont montré la voie avec des politiques d’obligation de dépôt). La Commission européenne soutient également le mouvement de l’OA via le programme Horizon 2020 qui comporte l’obligation d’assurer le libre accès aux publications issues des recherches qu’il aura contribué à financer (sous peine de sanctions financières).
Education Modules | DataONE
Below are links to education modules in powerpoint format that you can download and incorporate into your teaching materials. Materials are licensed as CC0 and you may enhance and reuse for your own purposes. All slides can be previewed in the embedded slideshare viewer below. We also provide 1- page synopses (with space for contact information) that can be used to promote Data Management training events at your institution. The topics covered include: Lesson 01: Why Data Management (.pptx) Trends in data collection, storage and loss, the importance and benefits of data management, and an introduction to the data life cycle. Lesson 02: Data Sharing(.pptx) Data sharing in the context of the data life cycle, the value of sharing data, concerns about sharing data, and methods and best practices for sharing data. Lesson 03: Data Management Planning(.pptx) Benefits of a data management plan (DMP), DMP components, tools for creating a DMP, NSF DMP information, and a sample DMP. Slide previews
Feedback | Plan S
Members of cOAlition S have read with interest the many comments made on Plan S. After discussion and consideration, the coalition has approved the implementation guidance on making full and immediate Open Access a reality. The guidance is now open for public feedback. Guidance on the Implementation of Plan S 1. Plan S aims for full and immediate Open Access to publications from publicly funded research. cOAlition S is committed to fulfil the specific target set out in Plan S – immediate Open Access to all scholarly publications from research funded by coalition members from 2020 onwards. cOAlition S does not favour any specific business model for Open Access publishing or advocate any particular route to Open Access given that there should be room for new innovative publishing models. The following guidance further specifies the principles of Plan S and provides paths for their implementation regarding scholarly articles. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Technical Guidance and Requirements 8. 9. 10.
Peerus: Never miss a scientific paper again!
Scientific societies worry Plan S will make them shutter journals, slash services
An existential threat. That's what scientific societies supported by journal subscriptions call Plan S. Introduced in September 2018 by European research funders and endorsed by others since then, the plan will require that grantees' papers be immediately available free of charge. All publishers that charge subscriptions will be affected, but scientific societies fear they could be hit especially hard. One, the Genetics Society of America (GSA) in Rockville, Maryland, predicts worldwide adoption of Plan S could cut its net revenue from publishing by a third. Less drastic impacts on societies' bottom lines might still force them to sell their journals to commercial publishers and cut back on activities supported by publishing, such as professional training and public outreach. "We're not seeing a sustainable, viable, nonprofit open-access model" if all funders back Plan S, says Tracey DePellegrin, executive director of GSA, which publishes two journals. "Science is unique," Moran says.
The Strategic Investments of Content Providers
Today’s news that Elsevier has acquired Plum Analytics from EBSCO provides the latest opportunity for insight into the remarkable evolution of the largest and most sophisticated academic content providers. From Elsevier and Springer to EBSCO and ProQuest, these publishers and content providers are reducing their reliance on their content businesses as engines of growth. While these businesses remain strong, they are pursuing one of two newer directions for greater growth. Aggregators like EBSCO and ProQuest are investing substantially in content support businesses, while scientific publishers are investing substantially in research management and analytics businesses. How and why they are making these investments tells us something about how they see the environment developing and offer indications of how libraries may wish to engage them most effectively. The health of the content businesses The strategic directions of content providers What this means for the academic library
Plan S Open Letter
Currently 1694 signatures processed In September 2018, a group of European government funding agencies announced the creation of cOAlition S, an organization created to implement “Plan S,” an initiative designed to ensure that “by 2020 scientific publications that result from research funded by public grants provided by participating national and European research councils and funding bodies, “must be published in compliant Open Access Journals or on compliant Open Access Platforms.” [1] Plan S is built on ten principles, which include: • A requirement that authors of funded research publications assign all of their copyright prerogatives (including republication, commercial use, and the creation of derivative versions) to the general public • A threat of “sanctions” against those authors who fail to comply • Is preprint archiving + Green Open Access compliant with PlanS even for hybrid journals? • What are the “sanctions” that will be imposed on noncompliant authors?
