YouTube Cover Song Face-Off: Foster the People's "Pumped Up Kicks" Each week, Mashable picks a popular song, finds 10 covers of it and asks you to vote for your favorite. Ever since Facebook brought real-time music streaming and discovery to users’ News Feeds and profiles, Spotify integration has shown us that our friends are huge fans of American indie pop band Foster the People. It’s no wonder several dozen musicians have covered the band’s hit song “Pumped Up Kicks” on YouTube. We’ve chosen 10 of the best versions and corralled them into the video gallery below. Pump up your speakers and then vote for your favorite rendition in the poll. Next week’s Face-Off is for Rihanna’s “We Found Love,” so submit your favorites in the comments section. Cris Cab Click here to view this gallery. To listen to more covers used in past YouTube Cover Song Face-Offs, click here. Which “Pumped Up Kicks” Cover Is Your Favorite? **The winner of this poll will be selected Oct. 28 at 9 a.m. Last Week’s Face-Off Winner: Artist vs. Check out that crowdsourced video below.
The Shock Doctrine In THE SHOCK DOCTRINE, Naomi Klein explodes the myth that the global free market triumphed democratically. Exposing the thinking, the money trail and the puppet strings behind the world-changing crises and wars of the last four decades, The Shock Doctrine is the gripping story of how America’s “free market” policies have come to dominate the world-- through the exploitation of disaster-shocked people and countries. At the most chaotic juncture in Iraq’s civil war, a new law is unveiled that would allow Shell and BP to claim the country’s vast oil reserves…. Immediately following September 11, the Bush Administration quietly out-sources the running of the “War on Terror” to Halliburton and Blackwater…. Based on breakthrough historical research and four years of on-the-ground reporting in disaster zones, The Shock Doctrine vividly shows how disaster capitalism – the rapid-fire corporate reengineering of societies still reeling from shock – did not begin with September 11, 2001.
Quebec student strike grows - Montreal About 36,000 post-secondary students in Quebec will have deserted their classrooms by the time the school day starts Tuesday in strikes over planned tuition-fee hikes. The strikes are the result of votes, with students in some universities and colleges choosing to use the tactic to apply pressure against the Charest government. While less than 10 per cent of all students have chosen to participate, the figure has grown considerably in recent days. Students are upset that the government will nearly double tuition -- to $3,800 from the current $2,200 -- over five years. They say education is a fundamental right and the tuition increase will discourage some people from continuing their studies. But the government notes that Quebec tuition is so low that, even with the increase, it will still be the lowest in Canada. The anti-government campaign has gotten more aggressive in recent days.
2004 Palm Island death in custody - Wiki The 2004 Palm Island death in custody incident relates to the death of Palm Island, Queensland resident, Cameron Doomadge (tribal name: Mulrunji) on Friday, 19 November 2004 in a police cell. The death of Mulrunji led to civic disturbances on the island and a legal, political and media sensation that continued for three years. The Attorney General indicted an Australian police officer for a criminal trial for the first time since the public prosecutor's office was established. The officer was charged for a death in custody, was acquitted by a jury in June 2007. Two legal questions arose from the death, firstly whether the taking into custody of Mulrunji was lawful and secondly were the injuries that led to his death illegally caused by the arresting officer. Politically this event raised questions relating to the 1990 Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody and whether its recommendations to prevent deaths in custody had been implemented by Government. Autopsy report[edit] Mr.
FreeB.E.A.G.L.E.S.: Suing and Making Complaints If you have been arrested and released without charge you may be able to sue the police for assault and unlawful imprisonment. When the police arrest you they must have reasonable grounds to suspect you of an offence. Even if you're released without charge the police may still have had good reason to suspect you - it will depend on the circumstances. Conversely you may be convicted of an offence and still be able to sue for wrongful arrest. You can sometimes sue the police even if you haven't been arrested. This could be, for example, where they try to move you for obstructing the highway when leafleting outside a fur shop - as they would be disregarding your right to freedom of expression (Art. 10, ECHR). Otherwise, use the small claims procedure in your local County Court, which can be used for claims of up to £5,000 and is free to those on Income Support or JSA. It is your right to sue, and it is important that it is exercised. Recommended solicitors to use for suing the police are:
Your rights - Taking Legal Action: suing the police W hen the old Police Complaints Authority was in place, many civil cases succeeded where formal complaints failed. It remains to be seen whether the establishment of the IPCC will alter this state of affairs. If you are considering bringing a civil action you should ask a lawyer as soon as possible to advise you on your chances of success and the possible amount of damages you might receive. DamagesIn February 1997 the Court of Appeal laid down guidelines on the level of damages in civil actions against the police in the case of The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis v. It is usual to sue the Chief Constable, who is generally responsible for the actions of police officers, of the relevant police force. If you are considering a civil action as well as making a formal complaint you should get legal advice from a solicitor or other adviser.
5A Defamation : Who can Sue? Individuals Any living individual can sue for defamation; the dead cannot i.e. an estate or relatives of a deceased person cannot sue for libel over defamatory statements made about the deceased person. Companies Companies can sue if the defamatory statement is in connection with its business or trading reputation. Residents overseas Foreigners can and do sue in the UK, even when they are not allowed to enter the country e.g. A Group of Individuals A group or class of individuals, if sufficiently defined, can also sue e.g. it would be defamatory to say that all strikers of a particular football team took performance enhancing drugs and each one could potentially sue, even though none had been named specifically. Taking the above example, unnamed individual players could not sue on the generalised allegation that players in the Premier League took performance enhancing drugs. 'Jigsaw Identification'
Ron Settles - Wiki The case had long-term impacts on the reputuation of Signal Hill, although a new police chief took steps to reform the police department.[3] The case was an early high-profile case handled by attorney Johnnie Cochran, who represented the family;[4] one of the policemen implicated in the incident was also represented by another noted civil rights attorney, Stephen Yagman.[2][5] Settles' death was one of several highly controversial deaths of arrestees in the 1970s and 80s that changed the way police departments deal with prisoners. Many police departments now videotape jail areas, and any time a police officer or correction officer touches a prisoner in a restraining way, a report is required to be written. These measures are intended to decrease the chances of police brutality in prison cells.[citation needed] References[edit] External links[edit]
Patrick Dorismond - Wiki Patrick Moses Dorismond (February 28, 1974 – March 16, 2000) was a security guard and father of two children who was killed by an undercover New York Police Department officer during the early morning of March 16, 2000. The undercover police officer approached Dorismond and his friend as they were standing outside the "Distinguished Wakamba Cocktail Lounge" and asked him where he and his partners could purchase marijuana.[1] One of the officers, Anthony Vasquez, shot Patrick Dorismond in the chest during a scuffle. The officers claim the scuffle began when Dorismond became angry after they propositioned him, loudly declaring he was not a drug dealer. They state he threw a punch at a second officer and with his friend, Kevin Kaiser, began attacking him. Officer Vasquez said he came to his partner's aid, hearing one of the men yelling "Get his gun!" An ambulance arrived on the scene within minutes of the shooting and Dorismond was transported to St. [edit] Funeral[edit] References[edit]
Amadou Diallo shooting - Wiki The Shooting of Amadou Diallo occurred on February 4, 1999, when Amadou Diallo, a 23-year-old immigrant from Guinea, was shot and killed by four New York City Police Department plain-clothed officers: Sean Carroll, Richard Murphy, Edward McMellon and Kenneth Boss, who fired a combined total of 41 shots, 19 of which struck Diallo, outside his apartment at 1157 Wheeler Avenue in the Soundview section of The Bronx. The four were part of the now-defunct Street Crimes Unit. All four officers were acquitted at trial in Albany, New York.[1] Diallo was unarmed at the time of the shooting, and a firestorm of controversy erupted subsequent to the event as the circumstances of the shooting prompted outrage both within and outside New York City. Issues such as police brutality, racial profiling, and contagious shooting were central to the ensuing controversy. Diallo biography[edit] One of four children of Saikou and Kadiatou Diallo, Amadou's family is part of an old Fulbe trading family in Guinea.
Sean Bell shooting incident - Wiki Memorial to Sean Bell at the place of the shooting Background[edit] Shooting incident[edit] The night of his death, Bell was holding his bachelor party at Club Kalua, a strip club that was being investigated by undercover police over accusations that the owners fostered prostitution.[8] The New York Post reported that Joseph Guzman had an argument with a man outside the bar, and threatened to get a gun. A toxicology report showed that Bell was legally intoxicated at the time he was shot. Other accounts of the conflict with the police. Isnora, the policeman who initiated the shooting, later claimed he saw a fourth man in the car, who fled the scene, possibly with the alleged weapon. "... there was no meaningful discussion of a fourth man, a mysterious figure who some in the Police Department have suggested may have been present along with the three men who were shot. Five of the seven officers took part in the shooting. Response to the shooting[edit] Trial and acquittal on all charges[edit]