Remix (book) 2008 book by Lawrence Lessig Lessig outlines two cultures - the read-only culture (RO) and the read/write culture (RW). The RO culture is the culture we consume more or less passively. Digital technology, however, does not have the 'natural' constraints of the analog that preceded it. As opposed to RO culture, Read/Write culture has a reciprocal relationship between the producer and the consumer. Lessig posits that digital technologies provide the tools for reviving RW culture and democratizing production. The Internet and Commons The internet is essentially the hub for this type of economy. Free Software Remixing is this software's very nature. YouTube's growing issue in copyright claims With growing frequency, YouTube has begun copyright striking, and taking down videos that appear to have claimed content in them in any way. To that Lessig's rebuttal is that the work made on such platforms should be free of legal ownership aside from its originator. Books portal
BBC World Service - The Forum, 05/03/2011 Culture libre Un article de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre. La culture libre est un mouvement social qui promeut la liberté de distribuer et de modifier des œuvres de l'esprit sous la forme d'œuvres libres[1] par l'utilisation d'internet ou d'autres formes de médias. Le mouvement de la culture libre puise sa philosophie de celle du logiciel libre en l'appliquant à la culture, dans des domaines aussi variés que l'art, l'éducation, la science, etc[2]. Les mécanismes juridiques des licences libres attachées à la culture sont également inspirés du logiciel libre ; l'utilisation des licences art libre ou Creative Commons a ainsi permis l'émergence de la musique libre et de l'art libre. La culture libre défend notamment l'idée que les droits d'auteurs ne doivent pas porter atteinte aux libertés fondamentales du public. Histoire[modifier | modifier le code] « Tu dis : “Cette pensée est à moi.” — Henri-Frédéric Amiel, Rien n'est à nous[3] Culture libre et licence libre[modifier | modifier le code]
Tragedy of the commons The tragedy of the commons concept is often cited in connection with sustainable development, meshing economic growth and environmental protection, as well as in the debate over global warming. It has also been used in analyzing behavior in the fields of economics, evolutionary psychology, anthropology, game theory, politics, taxation, and sociology. However the concept, as originally developed, has also received criticism for not taking into account the many other factors operating to enforce or agree on regulation in this scenario. Lloyd's pamphlet[edit] In 1833, the English economist William Forster Lloyd published a pamphlet which included an example of herders sharing a common parcel of land on which they are each entitled to let their cows graze. Garrett Hardin's article[edit] The Universal Declaration of Human Rights describes the family as the natural and fundamental unit of society. [edit] As a metaphor, the tragedy of the commons should not be taken too literally. See also[edit]
Creative Commons Organization creating copyright licenses for the public release of creative works Creative Commons (CC) is an American non-profit organization and international network devoted to educational access and expanding the range of creative works available for others to build upon legally and to share.[3] The organization has released several copyright licenses, known as Creative Commons licenses, free of charge to the public. These licenses allow authors of creative works to communicate which rights they reserve and which rights they waive for the benefit of recipients or other creators. An easy-to-understand one-page explanation of rights, with associated visual symbols, explains the specifics of each Creative Commons license. The organization was founded in 2001 by Lawrence Lessig, Hal Abelson, and Eric Eldred[4] with the support of Center for the Public Domain. In 2002, the Open Content Project, a 1998 precursor project by David A. Purpose and goal[edit] Creative Commons network[edit]
Elinor Ostrom Elinor "Lin" Ostrom (born Elinor Claire Awan;[2] August 7, 1933 – June 12, 2012) was an American political economist[3][4][5] whose work was associated with the New Institutional Economics and the resurgence of political economy.[6] In 2009, she shared the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences with Oliver E. Williamson for "her analysis of economic governance, especially the commons".[7] To date, she remains the only woman so honored. Ostrom lived in Bloomington, Indiana and served on the faculty of both Indiana University and Arizona State University. She held the rank of Distinguished Professor at Indiana University and was the Arthur F. Bentley Professor of Political Science and Co-Director of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis at Indiana University in Bloomington, as well as Research Professor and the Founding Director of the Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity at Arizona State University in Tempe. Personal life and education[edit] Career[edit] 1990.
Code et autres lois du cyberespace Un article de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre. Code et autres lois du cyberespace est un livre de Lawrence Lessig paru en 1999. Il est connu en anglais sous le titre de Code: Version 2.0 (en) (version remaniée de Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace). Il traite de la différence entre les lois dans le monde physique et dans le monde virtuel[1], sujet de nombreux débats depuis l'apparition de l'Internet. Code: Version 2.0 (en) (en) existe en deux versions. Les deux éditions du livre[modifier | modifier le code] La première verionn, datée de 1999, traitait l'impossibilité de la régulation de l'internet. La deuxième version était une extension de la première. Lawrence Lessig lors d'une conférence Les lois dans le monde virtuel[modifier | modifier le code] Le Cyberespace est un monde qui annule l'existence de toutes les frontières, par conséquent aucune loi ne lui est applicable. Partisans et critiques[modifier | modifier le code] Notes et références[modifier | modifier le code]
#3038363 SOPA Emergency IP list: So if these ass-fucks in DC decide to ruin the internet, here’s how to access your favorite sites in the event of a DNS takedown tumblr.com 174.121.194.34 wikipedia.org 208.80.152.201 # News bbc.co.uk 212.58.241.131 aljazeera.com 198.78.201.252 # Social media reddit.com 72.247.244.88 imgur.com 173.231.140.219 google.com 74.125.157.99 youtube.com 74.125.65.91 yahoo.com 98.137.149.56 hotmail.com 65.55.72.135 bing.com 65.55.175.254 digg.com 64.191.203.30 theonion.com 97.107.137.164 hush.com 65.39.178.43 gamespot.com 216.239.113.172 ign.com 69.10.25.46 cracked.com 98.124.248.77 sidereel.com 144.198.29.112 github.com 207.97.227.239 # Torrent sites thepiratebay.org 194.71.107.15 mininova.com 80.94.76.5 btjunkie.com 93.158.65.211 demonoid.com 62.149.24.66 demonoid.me 62.149.24.67 # Social networking facebook.com 69.171.224.11 twitter.com 199.59.149.230 tumblr.com 174.121.194.34 livejournal.com 209.200.154.225 dreamwidth.org 69.174.244.50
Lawrence Lessig, l'ami des damnés du web Temps de lecture: 17 min À 56 ans, Lawrence Lessig a un CV plus long que le bras (littéralement) et accompli plus que certains ne pourraient le faire en dix vies. Universitaire, constitutionnaliste, figure de proue des défenseurs d'internet, il est une icône geek qui s'attaque aujourd'hui à la corruption et à la défense de réformes pour la démocratie, mais qui a aussi été candidat à la Maison-Blanche... La liste pourrait continuer ainsi pendant longtemps, mais l'ancien candidat à la primaire démocrate était à Paris, mi-avril. Le documentaire de Flore Vasseur est assez éloigné de celui de Laura Poitras, Citizenfour. Lawrence Lessig estime énormément Snowden. «Avant la conférence, j’ai lu tout ce que pouvais sur les décisions qui l’ont poussé à faire ce qu’il a fait. Lawrence Lessig a demandé en septembre dernier à ce qu'il soit grâcié, en raison de l'utilité publique des informations divulguées. L'assistant progressiste d'un juge conservateur Le «Elvis du droit numérique»
Private property Sign on a chain-link fence warning the public against trespassing on private property. Private property is a legal designation of the ownership of property by non-governmental legal entities.[1] Private property is distinguishable from public property, which is owned by a state entity; and collective property, which is owned by a group of non-governmental entities.[2] Private property is further distinguished from personal property, which refers to property for personal use and consumption. Categorization of collective property can be indeterminable, such as in a not-for-profit private university; or determinable, such as in the case of a legal partnership. History[edit] Prior to the 18th century, "property" was generally used in reference to land ownership. Economic perspectives[edit] Liberal perspectives[edit] Austrian School perspective[edit] Socialist perspectives[edit] A plaque marking state property in Jūrmala. Personal property versus means of production[edit] See also[edit] Notes[edit]
Code is Law – Traduction française du célèbre article de Lawrence Lessig Le 5 mars dernier, Tristan Nitot se pose la question suivante sur Identi.ca : « Je me demande s’il existe une version française de Code is Law, ce texte sublime de Lessig ». Monsieur Nitot qui évoque un texte sublime de Monsieur Lessig… Mais que vouliez-vous que nos traducteurs de Framalang fassent, si ce n’est participer à modifier favorablement la réponse de départ étonnamment négative ! Écrit il y a plus de dix ans, cet article majeur a non seulement fort bien vieilli mais se serait même bonifié avec le temps et l’évolution actuelle du « cyberespace » où neutralité du net et place prise par les Microsoft, Apple, Google et autres Facebook occupent plus que jamais les esprits et nos données[1]. Bonne lecture… Le code fait loi – De la liberté dans le cyberespace Code is Law – On Liberty in Cyberspace Lawrence Lessig – janvier 2000 – Harvard Magazine(Traduction Framalang : Barbidule, Siltaar, Goofy, Don Rico) À chaque époque son institution de contrôle, sa menace pour les libertés.