Geolocation API Specification Abstract This specification defines an API that provides scripted access to geographical location information associated with the hosting device. Status of This Document This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. This document has been reviewed by W3C Members, by software developers, and by other W3C groups and interested parties, and is endorsed by the Director as a W3C Recommendation. By publishing this Recommendation, W3C expects that the functionality specified in this Geolocation API Recommendation will not be affected by changes to HTML5 or Web IDL as those specifications proceed to Recommendation. This document incorporates minor changes made against the Proposed Recommendation of 10 May 2012. Comments on the document should be sent to the Working Group's public mailing list email@example.com (subscribe, archives). Table of Contents 1 Conformance requirements 2 Introduction 3 Scope Geolocation The
Selectors API Level 1 Abstract Selectors, which are widely used in CSS, are patterns that match against elements in a tree structure [SELECT][CSS21]. The Selectors API specification defines methods for retrieving Element nodes from the DOM by matching against a group of selectors. Status of this Document This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. The Web Applications (WebApps) Working Group has developed a comprehensive Selectors API test suite and has demonstrated interoperability of the features among implementations. Please send comments about this document to firstname.lastname@example.org (public archive) with [selectors-api] in the subject. This document was developed by the Web Applications Working Group. This document has been reviewed by W3C Members, by software developers, and by other W3C groups and interested parties, and is endorsed by the Director as a W3C Recommendation. This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February 2004 W3C Patent Policy.
Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 1.1 (Second Edition) W3C Recommendation 16 August 2011 This version: Latest version: Previous version: Public comments: email@example.com (archive) Editors: Erik Dahlström, Opera Software <firstname.lastname@example.org> Patrick Dengler, Microsoft Corporation <email@example.com> Anthony Grasso, Canon Inc. Chris Lilley, W3C <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cameron McCormack, Mozilla Corporation <email@example.com> Doug Schepers, W3C <firstname.lastname@example.org> Jonathan Watt, Mozilla Corporation <email@example.com> Jon Ferraiolo, ex Adobe Systems <firstname.lastname@example.org> (Versions 1.0 and 1.1 First Edition; until 10 May 2006) 藤沢 淳 (FUJISAWA Jun), Canon Inc. Dean Jackson, ex W3C <email@example.com> (Version 1.1 First Edition; until February 2007) Please refer to the errata for this document, which may include some normative corrections. Copyright © 2011 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), All Rights Reserved. Abstract Status of this document Comments on this Recommendation are welcome.
Network Communication API Abstract To enable Web applications to communicate using TCP this specification introduces the TCPSocket interface and a corresponding optional security model. Status of this Document This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. This document is a first editors' draft specification of the network API from the Web API group, part of the Rich Web Client Activity. This document is published to solicit comments from interested parties. This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February 2004 W3C Patent Policy. Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. Table of Contents Introduction The TCPSocket interface enables a TCP connection from the client to the server from which the script was downloaded and executed from. This interface does not allow for raw access to the underlying network. Add an introduction to the client-side and server-side of using the direct connection APIs. Provide an example here The
WOFF File Format 1.0 1. Introduction This document specifies a simple compressed file format for fonts, designed primarily for use on the Web and known as WOFF (Web Open Font Format). Despite this name, WOFF should be regarded as a container format or "wrapper" for font data in already-existing formats rather than an actual font format in its own right. The WOFF format is a container for the table-based sfnt structure used in e.g. The structure and contents of decoded font data exactly match those of a well-formed input font file. Notational Conventions The all-uppercase key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC-2119]. This document includes sections of text that are called out as "Notes" and set off from the main text of the specification. 2. The primary purpose of the WOFF format is to package fonts linked to Web documents by means of CSS @font-face rules.
Web IDL This section describes a language, Web IDL, which can be used to define interfaces for APIs in the Web platform. A specification that defines Web APIs can include one or more IDL fragments that describe the interfaces (the state and behavior that objects can exhibit) for the APIs defined by that specification. An IDL fragment is a sequence of definitions that matches the Definitions grammar symbol. The set of IDL fragments that an implementation supports is not ordered. Each definition (matching Definition) can be preceded by a list of extended attributes (matching ExtendedAttributeList), which can control how the definition will be handled in language bindings. 3.1. Every interface, partial interface definition, dictionary, partial dictionary definition, exception, enumeration, callback function and typedef (together called named definitions ) and every constant, attribute, exception field and dictionary member has an identifier , as do some operations. reserved identifiers 3.2. interface The
Mathematical Markup Language (MathML) Version 3.0 2nd Edition W3C Recommendation 10 April 2014 This version: Latest MathML 3 version: Latest MathML Recommendation: Previous versions: Editors' version: Editors: David Carlisle, NAG Patrick Ion, Mathematical Reviews, American Mathematical Society Robert Miner (deceased), Design Science, Inc. Principal Authors: Ron Ausbrooks, Stephen Buswell, David Carlisle, Giorgi Chavchanidze, Stéphane Dalmas, Stan Devitt, Angel Diaz, Sam Dooley, Roger Hunter, Patrick Ion, Michael Kohlhase, Azzeddine Lazrek, Paul Libbrecht, Bruce Miller, Robert Miner (deceased), Chris Rowley, Murray Sargent, Bruce Smith, Neil Soiffer, Robert Sutor, Stephen Watt Please refer to the errata for this document, which may include some normative corrections. See also translations. Abstract Status of this Document
File API Abstract This specification provides an API for representing file objects in web applications, as well as programmatically selecting them and accessing their data. This includes: A FileList interface, which represents an array of individually selected files from the underlying system. Additionally, this specification defines objects to be used within threaded web applications for the synchronous reading of files. The section on Requirements and Use Cases [REQ] covers the motivation behind this specification. This API is designed to be used in conjunction with other APIs and elements on the web platform, notably: XMLHttpRequest (e.g. with an overloaded send() method for File or Blob objects), postMessage, DataTransfer (part of the drag and drop API defined in [HTML,]) and Web Workers. Status of this Document This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. This document is the 12 September 2013 Last Call Working Draft of the File API specification. 1. 2. 3.
Developer Network Element Traversal Specification Abstract This specification defines the ElementTraversal interface, which allows script navigation of the elements of a DOM tree, excluding all other nodes in the DOM, such as text nodes. It also provides an attribute to expose the number of child elements of an element. It is intended to provide a more convenient alternative to existing DOM navigation interfaces, with a low implementation footprint. Status of this Document This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. This is the 22 December 2008 Recommendation of the Element Traversal specification. This document has been reviewed by W3C Members, by software developers, and by other W3C groups and interested parties, and is endorsed by the Director as a W3C Recommendation. The Web Applications (WebApps) Working Group has produced a test suite and implementation report to indicate the current level of implementation support for this specification, with passing results for all tests. 1. 1.1. 1.2. 2. 3.
C Interaction Domain Nearby: People of the Interaction Domain. Mission W3C's Interaction Domain is responsible for developing technologies that shape the Web's user interface. These technologies include (X)HTML, the markup language that started the Web. W3C Interaction Domain technologies enable millions of people every day to browse the Web and to author Web content. Industry Impact W3C: Printing and the Web [PDF] Copyright © 2001-2015 W3C ® ( MIT , ERCIM , Keio), All Rights Reserved.
Clipboard API and events Abstract This document describes APIs for clipboard operations such as copy, cut and paste in web applications. Status of This Document This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. This document was published by the Web Applications Working Group as a Working Draft. Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February 2004 W3C Patent Policy. Table of Contents 1. As well as sections marked as non-normative, all authoring guidelines, diagrams, examples, and notes in this specification are non-normative. The key words MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL in this specification are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. 2. This section is non-normative. 3. There are many use cases for being able to change the default clipboard operations (cut/copy/paste). 4. 5. Note 6. To
PhantomJS | PhantomJS