background preloader

Inversion of Control Containers and the Dependency Injection pattern

Inversion of Control Containers and the Dependency Injection pattern
In the Java community there's been a rush of lightweight containers that help to assemble components from different projects into a cohesive application. Underlying these containers is a common pattern to how they perform the wiring, a concept they refer under the very generic name of "Inversion of Control". In this article I dig into how this pattern works, under the more specific name of "Dependency Injection", and contrast it with the Service Locator alternative. The choice between them is less important than the principle of separating configuration from use. One of the entertaining things about the enterprise Java world is the huge amount of activity in building alternatives to the mainstream J2EE technologies, much of it happening in open source. A lot of this is a reaction to the heavyweight complexity in the mainstream J2EE world, but much of it is also exploring alternatives and coming up with creative ideas. Components and Services A Naive Example class MovieLister...

Related:  PM & PatternsTriage 2

Understanding The Application Controller Through Object Messaging Patterns Earlier in the year, I posted a few times on the Application Controller pattern that I was implementing, including some workflow service related posts, all leading up to the presentation on decoupling workflow from forms that I gave at Austin Code Camp ‘09. I’ve been working with this style of architecture in my winforms apps since then, and have really grown to love it. And now with my new job and my new team, I’ve recently had a chance to take the same patterns and port them over to the .net compact framework.

Inversion of control - Wikipedia In software engineering, inversion of control (IoC) is a design principle in which custom-written portions of a computer program receive the flow of control from a generic framework. A software architecture with this design inverts control as compared to traditional procedural programming: in traditional programming, the custom code that expresses the purpose of the program calls into reusable libraries to take care of generic tasks, but with inversion of control, it is the framework that calls into the custom, or task-specific, code. Overview[edit] With inversion of control, on the other hand, the program would be written using a software framework that knows common behavioral and graphical elements, such as windowing systems, menus, controlling the mouse, and so on. Inversion of control serves the following design purposes: Inversion of control is sometimes facetiously referred to as the "Hollywood Principle: Don't call us, we'll call you".

Understanding IoC Container - sfeldman.NET Thursday, February 14, 2008 10:58 PM Sean Feldman In a multi layered application architecture, loosely coupled code is more than a important. It's the basic which can either help the entire project progress, or drive it down the slope to the end (in the bad meaning of the word). One of the basics to keep coupling as low as possible is Inversion of Control (IoC) container. I will try to show how to put in place a simple version of IoC container to allow loosely coupled design. Einar Ingebrigtsens Playground Not everyone has the luxury of jumping on new technologies, it can be historical reasons, don’t have time to learn, deployment reasons – or flat out you simply don’t like anything new :) . Anyways, I was doing a codereview on a project last week, which was written in Windows Forms. The developers had some pain, Windows Forms being one of them – and a constant feeling that they were barking up the wrong tree when using Windows Forms. Its been a couple of years since my last Windows Forms project, and I must admit I remember the feeling of constantly banging my head against the wall without getting the code quality I wanted when doing UI. One of the things I saw that the project could benefit from, was unit testing – to help them fight problems with regression, and get a constant quality indicator on the project.

InversionOfControl application architecture · API design · object collaboration design tags: Inversion of Control is a common phenomenon that you come across when extending frameworks. Indeed it's often seen as a defining characteristic of a framework. Let's consider a simple example. Dependency Injection and Inversion of Control with ASP.NET MVC As you delve more into ASP.NET MVC you start to come across a whole new way of doing things that Web Forms development didn't really expose you to. Inversion of Control (IoC) and Dependency Injection (DI) are two phrases that crop up a lot in the MVC space. So what are they all about? And should you care? I should start by stating the IoC and DI are not unique to ASP.NET MVC. They have been around a long time.

MVVM for .NET Winforms – MVP-VM (Model View Presenter - View Model) Introduction This post introduces the MVP-VM (Model View Presenter – Model View) design pattern, which is the windows forms (winforms) equivalent of WPF/Silverlight MVVM. The MVP-VM pattern is best suited to winforms applications that require full testing coverage and use data binding extensively for syncing the presentation with the domain model. Evolution Before we start digging deep into MVP-VM, lets have a quick review of the patterns from which it has evolved. Presentation Model Martin Fowler introduced the Presentation Model pattern as a way of separating presentation behavior from the user interface, mainly to promote unit testing.

Dependency injection Dependency injection allows a program design to follow the dependency inversion principle. The client delegates the responsibility of providing its dependencies to external code (the injector) . The client is not allowed to call the injector code.[2] It is the injecting code that constructs the services and calls the client to inject them. Methods GET and POST in HTML forms - what's the difference? In HTML, one can specify two different submission methods for a form. The method is specified inside a FORM element, using the METHOD attribute. The difference between METHOD="GET" (the default) and METHOD="POST" is primarily defined in terms of form data encoding.

MVVM (Model-View-ViewModel) Pattern For Windows Form Applications, using C# Introduction The MVVM pattern is in favour of WPF/Silverlight developers because of its advantages. Microsoft says that MVVM: Separates the business and presentation logic of the application from its UI, and makes it much easier to test, maintain, and evolve. Allows developers and UI designers to more easily collaborate when developing their respective parts of the application.(Look at the link) Why video game coders don't use TDD, and why it matters Whilst working on Sol Trader, I’ve written many unit tests for my code. Many of these tests have been written before the code itself, using a practice called Test-driven Development (TDD). Test-driven development is the practice of writing a failing test in order to specify the behaviour of a piece of code, then writing the code to satisfy the tests afterwards. We then refactor and improve our code from there. In most programming environments, people are talking about TDD and trying to practice it. It’s even become an essential bullet point on job adverts, as if not practicing TDD makes us fundamentally worse programmers (which isn’t true, by the way.)

How to: Pass Values Between ASP.NET Web Pages The topic you requested is included in another documentation set. For convenience, it's displayed below. Choose Switch to see the topic in its original location. If your application redirects (navigates) from one ASP.NET Web page to another, you will frequently want to pass information from the source page to the target page.

Presentation Model (MVVM) Good Practices Download demo - 265 KB Contents Introduction The challenge of maintaining class balance in Hearthstone's Arena mode Class balance in video games is a delicate juggling act, and no one knows that better than the developers at Blizzard Entertainment. Last week, the studio implemented plans to balance the Arena mode of its popular digital card game Hearthstone. In Arena, a player chooses from one of three randomly selected classes, then puts together the best deck they can from a series of random neutral and class cards.