background preloader

Chapter Seven Systems thinking

Facebook Twitter

DSnowdenALeadersFrameworkHBR. Tools for Systems Thinkers: 7 Steps to Move from Insights to Interventions. In the previous four chapters of this series, I discussed the different concepts, approaches, and tools for activating systems thinking. Now it’s time to start pulling those parts together. In this chapter, I outline seven steps you can take to move from systems exploration to a practice of systems interventions*.

An intervention is the act of intentionally seeking to shift the status quo of a scenario, situation or system. From a system’s perspective, not all interventions are good nor equal. When you try to make change in a dynamic, constantly evolving system, there will be push back. You can get your desired outcome, but along with what the system wants to do. I have crafted these seven steps to help you tackle systems intervention design in a way that avoids unintended consequences, and can maximize the positive outcomes. In order to shift the status quo of a problem arena, we must first deeply understand what is going on below the surface, at the systems level. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

Why Managers Haven’t Embraced Complexity. Nobody would deny that the world has become more complex during the past decades. With digitization, the interconnectivity between people and things has jumped by leaps and bounds. Dense networks now define the technical, social, and economic landscape. I remember well when the idea of applying complexity science to management was first being eagerly discussed in the 1990s. By then, for example, scholars at the University of St. Gallen had developed a management model based on systems thinking. Popular literature propagated the ideas of complexity theory — in particular, the notion of the “butterfly effect” by which a small event in a remote part of the world (like the flap of a butterfly’s wings) could trigger a chain of events that would add up to a disruptive change in the larger system (such as a hurricane).

Managers’ eyes were opened to the reality that organizations are not just complicated but complex. Complexity wasn’t a convenient reality given managers’ desire for control. Managing Complexity. Back in the 15th Century, Leonardo da Vinci, the great genius of the Middle Ages, said that “simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.” Most modern managers would agree. Every good operation works hard to streamline its processes down to the barest essentials.

However, the world is a complex place and it’s only getting more so, which is why many management thinkers have been urging businesses to embrace complexity, to become, in effect, system thinkers rather than reductionists. As Richard Straub noted in a recent article in HBR, that effort has largely failed and we shouldn’t be surprised. What Is Complexity? Before we can manage complexity, we first need to understand it and much of the literature on the subject obscures more than it reveals. The Complexity of an Entity: Technically known as Kolmogorov-Chaitin complexity, the complexity of an entity is defined through the amount of information it takes to describe it. I think it was this type of complexity that Mr. Managers vs. . – Greg. Lessons Learned -- Why the Failure of Systems Thinking Should Inform the Future of Design Thinking. "You never learn by doing something right ‘cause you already know how to do it.

You only learn from making mistakes and correcting them. " Russell Ackoff Design and "design thinking" is gaining recognition as an important integrative concept in management practice and education. But it will fail to have a lasting impact, unless we learn from the mistakes of earlier, related ideas. For instance, "system thinking", which shares many of the conceptual foundations of "design thinking", promised to be a powerful guide to management practice, but it has never achieved the success its proponents hoped for.

If systems thinking had been successful in gaining a foothold in management education over the last half of the 20th century, there would be no manage by designing movement, or calls for integrative or design thinking. Systems thinking, as written about and practiced by Russell Ackoff, C. I have been an enthusiastic student and teacher of systems thinking for almost three decades. Feature Article: Learning the Lessons of Systems Thinking: Exploring the Gap between Thinking and Leadership - Integral Leadership Review. It is worth describing the postmodern chain of discourse that followed the blo’s publication. Consider that this piece started as my informal response on the Transforming Transformation email discussion list, in response to a blog post that was circulated as a link on that list. Several of the regulars on the list responded to Fred’s piece at the Fast Company blog. I was invited to formalize the post as a kind of scholarly letter. Twitter was involved at several points, as well.

(Twitter posts have led to other articles). Dr. I don’t believe that systems thinking to be a failure because it has not yet been wholly adopted. What models do we purport or promote that an executive will be able to learn in one day and then retain in memory and experience for useful application? Like many scholars, I am an unrepentant theory builder that likes to think my ideas and practices make a difference.

A Belief System without the Beliefs Dr. I would push the argument one step further. Peter H. Systems Thinking: Understanding the Whole and Not Just the Parts. I was very intrigued with this concept when I read it in the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK). This concept is defined in the Underlying Competencies (chapter 8) of the BABOK. This concept is so powerful and if used more in organizations can produce remarkable events; however, I have found that Systems Thinking can only be utilized to its fullest potential if the culture of the organization allows for that. However, as business analysts this is a concept that we should have in our arsenal of tools as this concept can help to clearly identify the root cause of problems that need to be solved.

What is Systems Thinking? According to the BABOK Systems Thinking is defined as: " Systems theory and Systems Thinking suggest that the system as a whole will have properties, behaviors and characteristics that emerge from the interaction of the components of the system, and which are not predictable from an understanding of the components alone. Systems Thinking allows organizations to: Systems Thinking | The MITRE Corporation. Definition: The ability and practice of examining the whole rather than focusing on isolated problems (P.

Senge) [1]. The act of taking into account the interactions and relationships of a system with its containing environment (Y. Bar Yam, New England Complex Systems Institute). Keywords: holism, holistic, interactions, multidimensionality, multiple perspectives, relationships, synthesis, synthetic, system thinking, systems thinking MITRE SE Roles & Expectations: MITRE systems engineers are expected to: (a) understand the linkages and interactions among the elements of their system or enterprise and its connecting entities; (b) align goals and purposes across the enterprise; and (c) ask probing questions and trace the implications of potential answers across the enterprise. Background Systems thinking requires knowledge and understanding—both analysis and synthesis—represented in the same view. The following concepts are important in applying systems thinking: Example References & Resources.

Systems Thinking: What, Why, When, Where, and How? | Leverage Networks. By Michael Goodman Even if you're intrigued by the possibility of looking at business problems in systemic ways, you may not know how to go about actually using the principles and tools in your workplace. The tips in this article are designed to get you started, whether youíre trying to introduce systems thinking in your company or attempting to implement the tools in an organization that already supports this approach. Learn what systems thinking involves; why itís important; when, where, and how to use it; and how to recognize when youíve gotten a handle on it. This document is intended for individual use only. Copyright restrictions apply. To make paper copies to distribute to others, you must purchase additional rights. March 1997. Introduction to Systems Thinking (PDF version) | Leverage Networks. System. We hear and use the word all the time. "There's no sense in trying to buck the system," we might say.

Or, "This job's getting out of control; I've got to establish a system. " Whether you are aware of it or not, you are a member of many systems-a family, a community, a church, a company. You yourself are a complex biological system comprising many smaller systems. This volume explores these questions and introduces the principles and practice of a quietly growing field: systems thinking. Why is a systemic perspective an important complement to analytic thinking?

It's been said that systems thinking is one of the key management competencies for the 21st century. DBIO: Systems Thinking Perspective. ”Mastery does not mean having a plan for the whole, but having an awareness of the whole.” Peter M. Senge. The Dance of Change, 1999. The intent of this site is to provide a collection of resources about systems thinking, with a focus on how systems thinking can benefit information professionals and help them increase leverage in their interactions with professional colleagues.

Please browse the webliography to find articles, newsletters, or web sites that will give you a more complete picture of systems thinking concepts and applications. What is systems thinking? The heart of systems thinking is the principal of interconnectedness. The intent of this section of the DBIO site is to provide a collection of resources about systems thinking, with a focus on how systems thinking can benefit information professionals and help them increase leverage in their interactions with professional colleagues. Why systems thinking? How can information professionals adapt a systems thinking perspective?

Systems Thinking for ITSM - Axios Systems. Systems thinking could be described as a movement. It has been around for a long time, in various forms, but is only now gaining real traction in the wider world of business. It started in the 1950s, when William Edwards Deming used a systematic approach to improving manufacturing in Japan, giving his name to the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle that is commonly used to drive continual improvement of processes and products in industry. Since then, a number of people have pushed the systems thinking bandwagon forward. Now, it has a small but dedicated – and growing - band of followers who believe, absolutely, in this new methodology. And they are probably right to do so. They call themselves systems thinkers and have something of a “them-and-us” attitude towards traditional command-and-control managers.

So what is systems thinking? What is it? Systems thinking certainly is a new way of thinking. The service customer is the most important part of a service delivery system. Study the system. 0960538. Viewcontent. Systems-Thinking-Organizational-Change-and-Agency.pdf. ST%204%20Key%20Questions.pdf. Systems Thinking and Design Thinking: Complimentary Approaches? | Systems Thinking World Journal. Grace Mugadza. Volume 4. February 9, 2015 Abstract Design Thinking(DT) and Systems Thinking (ST) came about through totally different and unrelated processes.

The philosophies of both can be traced back hundreds of years but there has been a recent resurgence in their application. Systems Thinking Systems Thinking (ST) as traced from the work of Ludwig Von Bertalanffy (1968) and other various contributors, believes a system to be characterized by the interactions of its components and the non-linearity of those interactions (Jackson M.C, 2003 and Walonick D, 1993). From this basic systemic stance, the systems perspective has developed and continues to develop and unfold to cover varied traditions and methods in the pursuit of how to tackle multifaceted / wicked problems (Rittel H and Webber M, 1973). Design Thinking (DT) The shift from industrial manufacturing to knowledge work and service delivery is further expanding the terrain of innovation. Systems Thinking and Design Thinking. Systems Thinking and Design Thinking: Complimentary Approaches? | Systems Thinking World Journal. OverviewSTarticle.pdf. Favorite Quotes. Systems Thinking The notes and quotes below are from the following book: Senge, Peter M.

THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. NY: Doubleday, 1990. ISBN 0-385-26094-6. These notes cover only a small portion of what is in the book. "...we are taught to break apart problems... we pay a hidden, enormous price. "Today, I believe, five new "component technologies" are gradually converging to innovate learning organizations" (6). 1. "A cloud masses, the sky darkens, leaves twist upward, and we know that it will rain. "Business and other human endeavors are also systems. "Though the tools are new, the underlying worldview is extremely intuitive; experiments with young children show that they learn systems thinking very quickly" (6-7). 2. "People with a high level of personal mastery are able to consistently realize the results that matter most deeply to them... 3. 4.

" bind people together around a common identity and sense of destiny... 5. Metanoia 1. 2. Thinking in Systems Quotes by Donella H. Meadows. Peter Senge Quote : "Systems thinking is a discipline..."