background preloader

Chapter Seven Systems thinking

Facebook Twitter

Why Managers Haven’t Embraced Complexity. Nobody would deny that the world has become more complex during the past decades.

Why Managers Haven’t Embraced Complexity

With digitization, the interconnectivity between people and things has jumped by leaps and bounds. Dense networks now define the technical, social, and economic landscape. I remember well when the idea of applying complexity science to management was first being eagerly discussed in the 1990s. By then, for example, scholars at the University of St. Gallen had developed a management model based on systems thinking. Why did this interest and work in complexity not lead to major changes in management practices? Complexity wasn’t a convenient reality given managers’ desire for control. Technology was not yet powerful enough to capture much complexity. Managing Complexity. Back in the 15th Century, Leonardo da Vinci, the great genius of the Middle Ages, said that “simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.”

Managing Complexity

Most modern managers would agree. Every good operation works hard to streamline its processes down to the barest essentials. However, the world is a complex place and it’s only getting more so, which is why many management thinkers have been urging businesses to embrace complexity, to become, in effect, system thinkers rather than reductionists. As Richard Straub noted in a recent article in HBR, that effort has largely failed and we shouldn’t be surprised.

Executives are paid to be accountable and are understandably reluctant to give themselves up to the complexity Gods. What Is Complexity? Before we can manage complexity, we first need to understand it and much of the literature on the subject obscures more than it reveals. Why the Failure of Systems Thinking Should Inform the Future of Design Thinking. "You never learn by doing something right ‘cause you already know how to do it.

Why the Failure of Systems Thinking Should Inform the Future of Design Thinking

You only learn from making mistakes and correcting them. " Russell Ackoff Design and "design thinking" is gaining recognition as an important integrative concept in management practice and education. But it will fail to have a lasting impact, unless we learn from the mistakes of earlier, related ideas.

For instance, "system thinking", which shares many of the conceptual foundations of "design thinking", promised to be a powerful guide to management practice, but it has never achieved the success its proponents hoped for. Feature Article: Learning the Lessons of Systems Thinking: Exploring the Gap between Thinking and Leadership - Integral Leadership Review. It is worth describing the postmodern chain of discourse that followed the blo’s publication.

Feature Article: Learning the Lessons of Systems Thinking: Exploring the Gap between Thinking and Leadership - Integral Leadership Review

Consider that this piece started as my informal response on the Transforming Transformation email discussion list, in response to a blog post that was circulated as a link on that list. Systems Thinking: Understanding the Whole and Not Just the Parts. I was very intrigued with this concept when I read it in the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK).

Systems Thinking: Understanding the Whole and Not Just the Parts

This concept is defined in the Underlying Competencies (chapter 8) of the BABOK. This concept is so powerful and if used more in organizations can produce remarkable events; however, I have found that Systems Thinking can only be utilized to its fullest potential if the culture of the organization allows for that. However, as business analysts this is a concept that we should have in our arsenal of tools as this concept can help to clearly identify the root cause of problems that need to be solved. The MITRE Corporation. Definition: The ability and practice of examining the whole rather than focusing on isolated problems (P.

The MITRE Corporation

Senge) [1]. The act of taking into account the interactions and relationships of a system with its containing environment (Y. Bar Yam, New England Complex Systems Institute). Systems Thinking: What, Why, When, Where, and How? By Michael Goodman Even if you're intrigued by the possibility of looking at business problems in systemic ways, you may not know how to go about actually using the principles and tools in your workplace.

Systems Thinking: What, Why, When, Where, and How?

The tips in this article are designed to get you started, whether youíre trying to introduce systems thinking in your company or attempting to implement the tools in an organization that already supports this approach. Learn what systems thinking involves; why itís important; when, where, and how to use it; and how to recognize when youíve gotten a handle on it.

This document is intended for individual use only. Copyright restrictions apply. To make paper copies to distribute to others, you must purchase additional rights. March 1997. Introduction to Systems Thinking (PDF version) System.

Introduction to Systems Thinking (PDF version)

We hear and use the word all the time. "There's no sense in trying to buck the system," we might say. Or, "This job's getting out of control; I've got to establish a system. " Whether you are aware of it or not, you are a member of many systems-a family, a community, a church, a company. You yourself are a complex biological system comprising many smaller systems. DBIO: Systems Thinking Perspective. ”Mastery does not mean having a plan for the whole, but having an awareness of the whole.”

DBIO: Systems Thinking Perspective

Systems Thinking for ITSM - Axios Systems. Systems thinking could be described as a movement.

Systems Thinking for ITSM - Axios Systems

It has been around for a long time, in various forms, but is only now gaining real traction in the wider world of business. It started in the 1950s, when William Edwards Deming used a systematic approach to improving manufacturing in Japan, giving his name to the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle that is commonly used to drive continual improvement of processes and products in industry. Since then, a number of people have pushed the systems thinking bandwagon forward. Now, it has a small but dedicated – and growing - band of followers who believe, absolutely, in this new methodology. 0960538. Viewcontent. Systems-Thinking-Organizational-Change-and-Agency.pdf.

ST%204%20Key%20Questions.pdf. Systems Thinking and Design Thinking: Complimentary Approaches? Grace Mugadza. Volume 4. February 9, 2015 Abstract Design Thinking(DT) and Systems Thinking (ST) came about through totally different and unrelated processes. Systems Thinking and Design Thinking: Complimentary Approaches? Systems Thinking by Peter M. Senge - Society for Organizational Learning North America Inc. Peter M.

Senge Table of Contents.IntroductionPremises About Personal PowerIdeas About Causability Introduction System dynamics is the study of complex systems, including such human systems as families, organizations, cities, and nations. If you look deeply into any system and analyze the relationships between members, you will find infinite complexity. OverviewSTarticle.pdf. Favorite Quotes. Systems Thinking The notes and quotes below are from the following book: Senge, Peter M. THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. NY: Doubleday, 1990. ISBN 0-385-26094-6. These notes cover only a small portion of what is in the book.

"...we are taught to break apart problems... we pay a hidden, enormous price. "Today, I believe, five new "component technologies" are gradually converging to innovate learning organizations" (6). Thinking in Systems Quotes by Donella H. Meadows. Peter Senge Quote : "Systems thinking is a discipline..."