background preloader


Facebook Twitter

Créez un site web, une boutique en ligne ou un blog gratuitement.

Dinner Party Assignment

MediaBias.pdf. Jj_racejusticecommunity_programfinal. ColorOfChangeNewsAccuracyReportCardNYC. BiasBasics.pdf. Mainstream Media Is Missing the Point. SOURCE: AP/ Alex Brandon President Barack Obama lines up his putt at the Mink Meadows Golf Club on August 25, 2009 in Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts. Reporters recently became angry with President Obama when they were excluded from his round of golf with Tiger Woods. By Eric Alterman | Thursday, February 21, 2013 According to a much-discussed recent report in Politico, members of the press are frustrated by their lack of face time with President Barack Obama.

Still, it would be hard to find an administration that did not inspire unhappiness among those who have the misfortune of drawing the assignment of covering it for their media outlet. It may or may not be true that President Obama is less available to the press corps than previous presidents—though in many respects, that means he is probably telling fewer lies to the media and the people than his predecessors did. The funding of the denial machine is becoming increasingly invisible to public scrutiny. What is wrong with this picture? Sasa Vucinic: Why we should invest in a free press. Alisa Miller: How the news distorts our worldview | TED Talk Subtitles and Transcript.

How does the news shape the way we see the world? Here's the world based on the way it looks -- based on landmass.And here's how news shapes what Americans see.This map -- (Applause) -- this map shows the number of secondsthat American network and cable news organizations dedicated to news stories,by country, in February of 2007 -- just one year ago.Now, this was a month when North Korea agreed to dismantle its nuclear facilities.There was massive flooding in Indonesia.And in Paris, the IPCC released its study confirming man's impact on global warming.The U.S. accounted for 79 percent of total news coverage.And when we take out the U.S. and look at the remaining 21 percent,we see a lot of Iraq -- that's that big green thing there -- and little else.The combined coverage of Russia, China and India, for example, reached just one percent.

When we analyzed all the news stories and removed just one story,here's how the world looked.What was that story? And what about the web? » The Changing TV News Landscape. By Mark Jurkowitz, Paul Hitlin, Amy Mitchell, Laura Santhanam, Steve Adams, Monica Anderson and Nancy Vogt of Pew Research Center The news programs that Americans watch on national cable channels and their local television stations have changed significantly in recent years while the network evening newscasts have remained remarkably stable, according to a new study from the Pew Research Center.

On cable, the news structure of the three channels—the mix of interviews, packaged segments and live coverage—has changed. After relying on significantly distinct formats five years ago, the three rivals now look strikingly similar. At the same time, some of the differences that demarcated daytime cable from prime time have also eroded in the past five years. Traditionally known for its attention to breaking news, daytime cable’s cuts in live event coverage and its growing reliance on interviews suggest it may be moving more toward the talk-oriented evening shows. Among the key findings: Fox News. Sign In. Partisans and Controversial News Online: Comparing Perceptions of Bias and ...: EBSCOhost. Loading... citation_instruction Partisans and Controversial News Online: Comparing Perceptions of Bias and Credibility in News Content From Blogs and Mainstream Media Detailed Record Title: Partisans and Controversial News Online: Comparing Perceptions of Bias and Credibility in News Content From Blogs and Mainstream Media.

Authors: Kim, Mihee1 Source: Mass Communication & Society. Document Type: Article Subject Terms: *CONTENT analysis (Communication)*NEWS websites*SAME-sex marriage*PREJUDICES*TRUTHFULNESS & falsehood*BLOGS*FACTORIAL experiment designs NAICS/Industry Codes: 519130 Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals Abstract: Based on the hostile media effect (HME), this 2 (partisan opinion) × 2 (news source) × 2 (content valence) factorial experiment investigated how partisans (N = 132), in terms of perceived bias and credibility, assess same-sex marriage coverage by either an online mainstream news source or a citizen blog.

Author Affiliations: View: Tools. The Anatomy of Media Bias: Trayvon Martin, Mike Daisey, and the Press. Please consider disabling it for our site, or supporting our work in one of these ways Subscribe Now > Julian Sanchez -- Research Fellow, Cato Institute Like many folks who had seen and been moved by Mike Daisey's powerful monologue "The Agony and the Ecstasy of Steve Jobs," I was profoundly disappointed by the recent revelation that he had not only fabricated some of the work's key scenes, but lied to the journalists and fact checkers at This American Life to prevent them from discovering the deception.

There's no point, at this stage, in adding another condemnation to the chorus, but I do want to highlight a pair of sharp pieces by Slate's Daniel Engber and The Economist's Erica Grieder, responding to the common claim that Daisey's narrative was, as the saying goes, "fake but accurate. " Suppose we think Daisey probably did just make up this encounter. Those of you who recall the headline are probably wondering what this could possibly have to do with the tragic case of Trayvon Martin. Media Bias. Since citizens cannot cast informed votes or make knowledgeable decisions on matters of public policy if the information on which they depend is distorted, it is vital to American democracy that television news and other media be fair and unbiased.

In a recent Gallup Poll, the majority of Americans believe that the mass media slant reports in favor of the liberal position on current issues. [The bias] is not the result of a vast left-wing conspiracy – [there is] an unconscious “groupthink” mentality that taints news coverage and allows only one side of a debate to receive a fair hearing. When that happens, the truth suffers. A reporter’s job is to present a balanced story. As you read, listen to and watch the news, you may notice stories that you think are biased. Bias by selection of sources – including more sources that support one view over another.

Bias by placement – Story placement is a measure of how important the editor considers the story. 7 Principles of Media Objectivity. Media manipulation is one of the most unfortunate aspects of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. We’ve seen papers blur the distinction between journalism and advocacy, fact-checking failures become fatal, photographers and Palestinians twist reality in mutually beneficial relationships, semantics become politicized and news executives cover up news to protect access. We’ve even seen journalists abuse readers who dared to disagree. None of this is in the public’s interest. News services capable of skewing Mideast coverage are just as capable of botching other areas of coverage. We expect journalists to maintain independence and objectivity.We expect news that is relevant, informative, proportionate, and engaging.We expect transparency.

If truth is to prevail, we must be more discerning news consumers, otherwise, we become passive objects of someone else’s agenda. The world is not responding to events in this country, but rather to the description of these events by news organizations. Media bias. Media bias is the bias or perceived bias of journalists and news producers within the mass media in the selection of events and stories that are reported and how they are covered. The term "media bias" implies a pervasive or widespread bias contravening the standards of journalism, rather than the perspective of an individual journalist or article. The direction and degree of media bias in various countries is widely disputed.

Practical limitations to media neutrality include the inability of journalists to report all available stories and facts, and the requirement that selected facts be linked into a coherent narrative.[1] Government influence, including overt and covert censorship, biases the media in some countries, for example North Korea and Burma.[2] Market forces that result in a biased presentation include the ownership of the news source, concentration of media ownership, the selection of staff, the preferences of an intended audience, and pressure from advertisers. Types[edit] Media Manipulation and Public Relations. The media are accused of bias by people from both ends of the political spectrum, but journalists, editors and owners maintain that they provide an objective source of news. This chapter will consider the ways in which the news is shaped and how this in turn influences the way environmental issues are reported and constructed in the mass media.

In the United States, where the debate over media objectivity is most heated, conservatives criticise the media for having a ‘liberal’ bias and these critics focus on the personal views of journalists, editors and media owners who, they argue, tend to be elitist, left-leaning and politically correct. A number of books have been published recently highlighting this supposed liberal bias including Press Bias and Politics: How the media frame controversial issues (Kuypers 2002), Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News (Goldberg 2003b) and Arrogance: Rescuing America from the Media Elite (Goldberg 2003a).

Background to the Issues. Media in the United States. Author and Page information In recent years, the American media has been plagued with all sorts of problems including, sliding profits, scandals about manipulation, plagiarism, propaganda, lower audiences, “dumbing down”, and so on. Media omissions, distortion, inaccuracy and bias in the US is something acknowledged by many outside the USA, and is slowly realized more and more inside the US. However, those problems have made it very difficult for the average American citizen to obtain an open, objective view of many of the issues that involve the United States (and since the United States is so influential culturally, economically, politically and militarily around the world, they are naturally involved in many issues). Those with power and influence know that media control or influence is crucial.

A free press is crucial for a functioning democracy, but if not truly free, paves the way for manipulation and concentration of views, thus undermining democracy itself. — J.W. Back to top Dr. News Bias Explored. New York Times learning network provides a wealth of information for teaches, students, and parents looking for new approaches to learning linked to some rich resources. One of the many features of the learning network is a thoughtfully approached lesson plan archive. The lesson plans are searchable by topic as well as by standards, a feature not common to many plan archives. A majority of the lesson plans incorporate actual news and opinion texts from the pages of the New York Times and other major news sources, and the archive is updated daily offering a fresh lesson plan each morning.The archive lists several lesson plans that could easily be incorporated into a unit focused on better understanding the news media, and a few focus directly on news bias.

Cultural Genocide Through Mainstream Media: A Brief Critical Analysis: EBSCOhost. Detailed Record Title: Cultural Genocide Through Mainstream Media: A Brief Critical Analysis. Authors: Olague, Rubén1Ekiaka Nzai, Valentin1 Source: Journal of Latinos & Education. 2014, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p309-316. 8p. Document Type: Article Subject Terms: *GENOCIDE*MASS media*POPULARITY*CRITICAL analysis*MINORITIES Author-Supplied Keywords: bilingual educationbiliteracyEnglish language learnersESLlanguage revivalmaintenancemulticultural educationpreservation Abstract: While the U.S. mainstream media continues to exercise its right of way in the American landscape, the predominant culture faces a population and popularity decrease.

Copyright of Journal of Latinos & Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. Author Affiliations: 1Department of Teacher & Bilingual Education, Texas A&M University–Kingsville Accession Number: Publisher Logo: View: How much worse can mainstream news media become?: EBSCOhost. "A conservative is a statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the liberal, who wishes to replace them with others…" — Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary" (1911) When CNN's Lou Dobbs recently lost his anchor gig — accepting big bucks in the process — reaction by some segments of the mainstream news media approached a frenzy of orgasmic delight.

To say they celebrated is putting it mildly. They absolutely loved it. Indeed, what some now call the "lame-stream media" took giant strides to live up to that description. It was as if millions of New York Yankees haters across America loudly rejoiced because the team admitted it cheats baseball by buying the best players. As a political independent, I care less about Lou Dobbs — a middle-of-the-road, cable TV talking head — or his views on the news. I care less how he feels about illegal immigration or his negative take on Barack Hussein Obama.

Getting back to TV journalism, which I once respected. By Richard Carter.