Combination Effects Demo — Scriptaculous Documentation. Script.aculo.us Combination Effects Demo These are the combination effects which are included in script.aculo.us: Note: This page is basically a duplicate of Combination Effects but was created to fix an invalid link on the script.aculo.us home page. Demo Click for Effect.Appear demo Click for Effect.Fade demo Click for Effect.Puff demo Click for Effect.BlindDown demo Click for Effect.BlindUp demo Click for Effect.SwitchOff demo Click for Effect.SlideDown demo Click for Effect.SlideUp demo Click for Effect.DropOut demo Click for Effect.Shake demo Click for Effect.Pulsate demo Click for Effect.Squish demo Click for Effect.Fold demo Click for Effect.Grow demo Click for Effect.Shrink demo Click for Effect.Highlight demo Pages.
Bones - The HTML5 Wordpress Starter Theme. The New Design Guidelines. Responsive Layouts, Responsively Wireframed. Responsive layouts, responsively wireframed Made with HTML/CSS (no images, no JS*) this is a simple interactive experiment with responsive design techniques. Use the buttons top-right to toggle between desktop and mobile layouts.
Using simple layout wireframes, this illustrates how a series of pages could work across these different devices, by simulating how the layout of each page would change responsively, to suit the context. Responsive layouts? Producing static wireframes to design layouts for websites, web applications and user-interfaces has worked well for a long time. However, this solution creates a new problem: How should we go about the process of designing these variable layouts? Enter, responsive wireframes? The 'wireframes' on this page (which are only very simple, high-level examples) were created with HTML/CSS, and some argue that this is the answer; to design in the browser. So which is better?
Traditional wireframes? HTML? So, what's the answer? Just wondering... Golden Ratio Calculator. ResizeMyBrowser.