Orgs -Dynamic and Non-Linear Theory

TwitterFacebook
Get flash to fully experience Pearltrees
Razib Khan on foragers vs. farmers: http://www.overcomingbias.com/2010/12/khan-on-forage-v-farm.html

Khan on Forage v Farm

The Collapse of Complex Business Models

http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2010/04/the-collapse-of-complex-business-models/ I gave a talk last year to a group of TV executives gathered for an annual conference. From the Q&A after, it was clear that for them, the question wasn’t whether the internet was going to alter their business, but about the mode and tempo of that alteration.
http://falkvinge.net/2011/06/05/the-pirate-wheel-privacy/

The Pirate Wheel

This is a first attempt to outline the Privacy spoke of The Pirate Wheel . It will certainly change over time, but this is a first stake in the ground. The Pirate Ideology is a new ideology that centers around the power over information, and gives it to the citizens, forcing a transparent government.
http://theamericanscholar.org/solitude-and-leadership/#.UVD7tdF-P0M Essays - Spring 2010 Print If you want others to follow, learn to be alone with your thoughts

Solitude and Leadership: an article by William Deresiewicz | The American Scholar

Value Creation

As originally posted : Center for a Stateless Society on October 6, 2010. Kevin Carson:

Why Self-Organized Networks Will Destroy Hierarchies — A Credo by Kevin Carson

http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/why-self-organized-networks-will-destroy-hierarchies-%e2%80%94-a-credo-by-kevin-carson/2011/04/17

So long as the predominant production methods required large aggregations of capital beyond the means of individuals and small groups, and corporate hierarchies were propped up by state ones, the cultural pathologies of hierarchy were surmountable. But technological change is rapidly eroding the requirement for capital outlays, nullifying the advantages of capital ownership, and increasing the vulnerability of hierarchy to external and internal attacks by self-organized networks. by billfulk Apr 17

Love Economy

Break Free from Our Systems Prison

http://bobcannell.blogspot.com/2010/10/break-free-from-our-systems-prison.html As a worker cooperator I have struggled for years to use 'normal' management techniques in worker co-ops. Often they don't work.

Redundancy Efficiency Creativity

http://bobcannell.blogspot.com/2010/11/redundancy-efficiency-creativity.html For centuries human organisations and endeavours have sought to be efficient, to use as few resources as possible to achieve the ends desired. It is the number one goal in 20 th century management theory, underpinning that whole systems theory based ideology.
http://valencetheory.pbworks.com/Effective-Theory

Valence Theory of Organization / Effective Theory

In an earlier chapter, I describe how Inter Pares considers the issue of scaling and growth, and suggest this comparison between BAH and UCaPP organizations:

Education: Uncertainty Isn't the Only Risk

Yesterday I gave a talk at the Snoqualmie Valley School District Foundation fundraising luncheon. http://www.fastcompany.com/1742679/education-uncertainty-isnt-only-risk

Dropping the Industrial Age Framework This is perhaps the most controversial of the robust implications, and one that appears here and on the list of uncertainties (as Measurement Approach below). We think of schools as factories and tests scores as key performance indicators. Current approaches to testing do not serve learning. Some educators take large chunks of their year to "teach to the test." Some school districts, when faced with enormous post-Great Recession budget pressures, choose to invest mainly in programs that drive better standardized tests results. The rewards structure of public and private funding reinforces this industrial age mentality. This appears justified when studies, such as the one conducted by Kuncel and Nezlett (Standardized Tests Predict Graduate Student's Success,) suggest that standardized admissions test are valid predictors of "valid predictors of many aspects of student success across academic and applied fields." If we take a factory view of educatio by billfulk Apr 8

Networks not Processes http://bobcannell.blogspot.com/2010/11/swarm-intelligence-versus-production.html

Swarm Intelligence versus Production Line Repression

Fordist production dehumanises people working in it, alienating them from their behaviour, generating stress and negative reactions, and divides people into controllers and controlled. Worker coops struggle to manage these tensions.

Organisation based on swarm intelligence is different. It looks to the 'intelligent' behaviour of social insects, where non-intelligent single insects working socially, can create extraordinarily complex organisations - two way highways, brutally efficient foraging behaviour, organised defence strategies, bridges over obstacles, complicated division of labour and large and complicated physical structures like termite nests. by billfulk Apr 8

One of the arguments which underpin the previous posts on Red Star, Cybersyn and Flower Market, yet are not explicitly stated is that socialist reconfigurations should be free enough to use state and market instruments alike. In this post I will try to better formulate this argument in this post by deriving insights from Rough Theory and Hack the State ( http://www.roughtheory.org and http://hackthestate.org ). While neoliberalism praises free markets, the contrasting memory of real socialism points out to central planning as the main driving force to organise an otherwise anarchic economic life.

state or market? what links red star, cybersyn and flower market? « nights of labour

It is in the 1980s that the correlation between efficiency and planning lost complete legitimacy. What was the motive of capitalist development suddenly became an impediment to it. And one did not even have to be right-wing neoliberal or Hayekian in order to attack planning as the source of bureaucratic inefficiencies or economic crises (see Hayek, 1944 for a hostile critique of Soviet planning). Through a delightful analysis of eight different cases including Europe, Africa and Soviet Russia, James Scott (1998) showed that top-down and centrally planned state projects are condemned to fail both in socialist and capitalist systems alike. On the other hand, despite declining credibility, state-led planning received a positive endorsement by institutionalist economists who praised the developmental bureaucrats of the East Asian countries as the major driving force behind the competitive performance of the region (Amsden, 1989; Chang, 2002). According to this view, planning enhances, rath by billfulk Apr 8

Dynamic and Non-linear Theory of Institutional Emergence

There are five ways of organising: the hierarchical, the egalitarian, the individualistic, the fatalistic and the autonomous. Each approach is a way of disorganising the other four: without the other four, it would have nothing to organise itself against. In Organising and Disorganising, Michael Thompson gives a detailed explanation of the dynamics of these five fundamental arrangements that underlie 'Cultural Theory'.
<< Back 'Organising and Disorganising: A Dynamic and Non-Linear Theory of Institutional Emergence and its Implications' by Michael Thompson "His lack of orthodoxy is evident in his antipathy to both methodological individualism and methodological collectivism and his predilection for the transaction as the central focus of analysis but a notion of transaction utterly without the baggage that organization theorists usually expect (Williamson 1975).

Blurbs .. about 'Organising and Disorganising'

His main message is that there is no such thing as an organization: only ways of organizing and disorganizing and that there are only five ideal type ways of doing such activity: the hierarchical, the individualistic, the egalitarian, the fatalistic and the autonomous.
by billfulk Apr 6

Swinging between the regulations of government and the excesses of the market has proven flaws, says Michael Thompson. Here he outlines how cultural theory can offer a new economic paradigm

Beyond boom and bust - diagrams

why should there be just two ways of organising if, as economists and political scientists have long argued, there are four kinds of goods: private, public, common-pool and club (see Figure 1). by billfulk Apr 6

Cultural Theory with Michael Thompson

Michael Thompson and Matthew Taylor discuss how cultural theory can offer a new economic paradigm by billfulk Apr 6

Book: Organising and Disorganising: A Dynamic and Non-Linear Theory of Institutional Emergence and its Implications.

Theory of Governance - Organising and Disorganising

"To seek control at the level we do is the ultimate waste of resources." UrbanSurvival Letter by billfulk Apr 7