
Changes & Updates
Get flash to fully experience Pearltrees
It’s been a couple of weeks since Google+ launched, and with the exception of China already blocking its use , people do seem to like it. That’s good news for Google after the failures of Buzz and Wave, and bad news for Facebook who now has a serious competitor in the social network space. You may think Google could sit back and watch the Google+ network grow, but that would be a mistake.
Google+ is being changed this week based on user feedback | Geek.com
Google+ with Gmail
What is perhaps trying to make a desktop with all the most used Google services, but rather likes the people who use facebook, you see the comment page and speak for chatChanges coming to Google+ this week - Computerworld
In a post on Google+, Vic Gundotra, a senior vice president of engineering at Google, told his followers that users have been providing a lot of positive and negative feedback about Google's new social network, and that the company plans to respond to some of them this week. "Lots of criticism for Google+," Gundotra wrote at about 2:05 a.m. EDT today.Google, trying to take a stand with its new social network, requires people to use real-world names on Google+.
Google+ faces thorny online identity issues | Deep Tech - CNET News
Maybe the alternative would be with a company or website profile. You put up a website such as Wikileaks and make it's profile on +. Still it sounds complicated. And just because you use a pseudonim doesn't mean Google is not aware who you are. Unless you are extremely carefull about using a TOR networks or going via the Darknet, filtering all your ports, cleaning all the cookies and not doing what you would normally do (simply not using google nor bing nor yahoo but duckduckgo) and you do that flawlessly... by Jul 13
When we use pseudos and avatars, it's to protect our privacy. Problem begins when I use a pseudo to publish attacks, agressive commentaries, without having to respond. by Jul 13

