How the global warming industry is based on one MASSIVE lie. For the growing band of AGW "Sceptics" the following story is dynamite. And for those who do believe in Al Gore's highly profitable myth about "Man-Made Global Warming", it will no doubt feel as comfortable as the rectally inserted suicide bomb that put paid to an Al Qaeda operative earlier this week. Now read on. Those of you who saw An Inconvenient Truth may remember, if you weren't asleep by that stage, the key scene where big green Al deploys his terrifying graph to show how totally screwed we all are by man-made global warming. This graph – known as the Hockey Stick Curve – purports to show rising global temperatures through the ages. In the part representing the late twentieth century it shoots up almost vertically.
Except that the graph – devised in 1998 by a US climatologist called Dr Michael Mann - is based on a huge lie, as Sceptics have been saying for quite some time. This is the point where British climate change scientists appear – and in a most unedifying light. Gore: Scientists Wouldn't Lie for Money to Advance Global Warming Theory - But Skeptics Would. Skip to main content Join Us @: Free email alerts! March 30, 2013 Hot Topics Home » Blogs » Noel Sheppard's blog Gore: Scientists Wouldn't Lie for Money to Advance Global Warming Theory - But Skeptics Would Nobel laureate Al Gore claimed on Friday that scientists involved in advancing the theory of global warming wouldn't do it just for the money. Without recognizing the hypocrisy, he also told FearLess Cottage consumer advocate Alex Bogusky that scientists espousing a skeptical view of his money-making theory are exclusively doing so for their own financial benefit (video follows with transcript and commentary): ALEX BOGUSKY , CONSUMER ADVOCATE, FEARLESS COTTAGE: Well, they also funded and created some think tanks that would release reports, and there were scientists that worked there, but they were funded by the tobacco industry.
AL GORE: Yeah, yeah. BOGUSKY : And some of those are, are now, have gone to work for oil and gas, or oil and coal. BOGUSKY : Yeah. GORE: Yeah. GORE: For sure. For sure? Anthropogenic Global Warming - Fact or Hoax? An editorial by James A. Peden. We decided to publish the results of our counter-exploration on the internet - but in a somewhat uniquely different fashion. Knowing that most folks aren't geeks, and may have little understanding of science or math, we're going to attempt to teach some of the essential physics and such as we go along.
Readers with little or no mathematical or scientific training may find it challenging, but if you have a general understanding of introductory college or even solid high school level chemistry or physics, you should have no problem in following this amazing tale. The brighter readers, even without a science background, should be able to follow, as well. Smart folks learn faster than most. What follows is a tale gleaned from many sources over what turned out to be an unreasonably long period of time. We're reminded of an earlier story, which happened back in 1912. Well, folks, it does appear we have a new, 21st Century Piltdown Man, and this time we know his name. Global Warming is a Scam. I'm sure I'll receive at least one comment about my source for this, but the points that Steven Milloy makes are really quite good. The pattern of heating and cooling has been happening for the entire life of the planet.
The world is a very big place, and we just don't know enough to say that we're changing the climate of the planet. As short as 30 years ago we had the popular press telling us we were going to have another ice age! Why would we think they're any more reliable now? If you want proof, look how most global warming fanatics now use "global climate change" rather than global warming. In my very un-fact based opinion, global warming people have four causes for their beliefs: They receive lots of money to do the research.
If you look at the real scientific data around global climate change, you'll see that at best, it's inconclusive (the result of many scientific studies where you don't have enough data). Share This Post: