Block 3- Petition of Right and English Bill of Rights
This is a good website for finding out about the petition of right because it has infromation about other things about rights as well as the petition. It also states some facts about the petition. It is a secondary source because it doesn't have the actual document on their website.
1. It has the four principles asserted in the document.
2. It has who initiated the document.
and 3. It explains why it was made. by Nov 28
I think this is a good link because if someone that doesn't know anything about the subject reads it he would understand it because he wrote what the problem was. When you read it you would find it quite interesting so a reader would read the whole thing. I would think this is a reliable source because in other websites they state the same idea.
Here are three reasons of why The Petition of Rights were important:
1. It limited the kings power which made him less powerfull and the citzens more powerful.
2. This agreement was denied by the king at first but then the commons forced him to sign it.
3. If the king was to make a new rule it would’ve had to go through the consent of the Parliament. by Nov 28
This is a good website because it offers a lot of definitions of the Petition of Right including different levels of essay (from easy till hard to understand, from detailed till basic etc...). by Nov 28
This is a primary site because this great webside because it has a lot of good information and it also has a lot of other documents like the Magna Carta, Bill of rights... There are also NO commercials what is very good because commercials annoy. There are 3 facts about the Petitition:
1. The King can only make new rules by the consent of the Parliament.
2. It also said that the people do not need to house soldiers of the government anymore.
3. It gave new rules to the people. It gave power to the people and away from the King. So the King did not had as much power as before. by Nov 30
I forgot to put this in my comment but it is a secondary source. It is secondary because it doesn't state the actual document. by Nov 28
This is a good website because it gives fact, details, pictures and relate able examples. One of Mr. Meyer’s criteria for a good website is that if the author was’nt proud enough of the website to post their name, is it completely reliable or honest; probably not.
Three reasons why the Petition of Rights was important:
The Petition for bayed the king from instantaneous power and soldiers.
The Petition stated that the king could not call for extra taxes unless the lords of that region specifically agreed.
King Charles denied the Petition at first, but the commons for the first time pressed the matter against the king. by Nov 28
It think this is a good website because it has standard level text and has no errors and it is a reliable website. This is a secondary source because it is not a word to word document.
1. King Charles and the Duke of Buckingham were determined to send another force to La Rochelle.
2. The Petition of Right was written on 17 March 1628
3. Charles agreed to the Petition on 7 June 1628. by Nov 28
This is a good website because it’s really simple, sweet and short. It’s easy to read and understand. I might have to get a secondary source since this doesn't look very reliable.
This is secondary source because it's not the orginial document and the information was taken from other websites because there's credit.
1. Sent from the English Parliament to Charles I
2. It’s a statement of civil liberties
3. When finally accepting the petition he was granted subsidies. by Nov 28
I think that this is a good website because it is really informative and it seems reliable and it is also very official looking. The author writes in a way that is easy to understand and can easily be interpreted.
This is a secondary source because it looks like the information was taken and made more easy to understand. Also the site is more like an encyclopedia and it lets people comment and change the information if it is incorrect.
Three things that I learned about the Petition of Right from this website are:
1. It was written in in the year 1628
2. Limited the King’s power and gave more power to the common people
3. Soon after it was issued the king disobeyed and ignored it and upset many people by Nov 28
I think that this scource is a secendary scource because it simplefies the whole document! by Nov 30
I think that it is a good site about the petition of rights because it is reliable, short and simple, and to the point. Is a bit short but you can still get an okay understanding of the topic, there are a few advertisements but it is easy to navigate. This website is a secondary scource.
1. Parliament passed the petition of right to limit the power of King Charles
2. King Charles had to get the consent of the government to raise taxes.
3. The petition of right was written in 1628 by Nov 28
This is a good site because it is a primary source. Yale is a great law school in the United States so I trust their website to have accurate information. by Nov 28
This is a good site. It uses the original wording of the document, English Bill of Rights 1689. This site is from the Avalon Project of the Lillian Goldman Law Library of the Yale Law School, which collects documents in law, history and diplomacy.
This law was written by the lords and members of Parliament after the death of James II, who, with his minsters and advisers, had taken away many of the rights of the nobles and tried to suppress the followers of the Protestant religion. by Nov 28
1. states the complaints that the members of Parliament had, lists the privileges that were taken away, and the unlawful things that were done. by Nov 28
2. Lists the rights that the members of Parliament state should be given or given back to them. by Nov 28
3. states that they want William and Mary, prince and princess of Orange, to be declared king and queen of England, and other countries that England ruled. In return of the signing of this document the lords and other members of Parliament would swear to be loyal to the crown.
This is a primary source by Nov 28
This is a really good website because it was written by the Fordham University which is a really good university in New York. The website is from one of the pages in the Modern History Sourcebook also made by the Fordham University. This website is also good because it says the date and where the English Bill of Rights was made (England-1689) and because it says the rules and laws written in the English Bill of Rights. This website is also a primary source because it says everything written in the English Bill of Rights.
The English Bill of Rights:
1)Was signed by Charles I
2)States that the Monarchs arent allowed to have an army when the country isnt in war.
3)The citizens are allowed to vote for the people in the parliament. by Nov 29
I think that this website is really good because it has very good information and is from a college. There are a few problems with this source, it is a primary source, and has all kinds of CRAZY words! It also is hard to understand. It is good because the information is really exact. I guess that if you were in college (what this site is for) you could probably understand it better.
•1. That the pretended power of suspending laws, or the execution of laws, by regal authority, without consent of parliament is illegal.
•2. That the pretended power of dispensing with the laws, or the execution of law by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal.
•3. That the commission for erecting the late court of commissioners for ecclesiastical causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious.
-ESG by Nov 28
I think the website I found here is a very good primary source beacause the information is very welll organized and it the whole bill is listed. In addition there are no comercials. by Nov 30
This website is a good website because though it is short, the website has interesting infromation about the history of the document that is known as the English Bill of Rights. For instance, three facts that the website states about the document are:
1. It is fundamental to the British constitutional government
2. William the third and Mary the second were the first monarchs with the Bill of Rights after King James the second was dethroned because of a revolution.
3. The English Bill of Rights states that Englishmen have certain rights that are automatic and cannot be infringed upon.
This site is a secondary source because it does not have the actual English Bill of Rights on the website. by Nov 28
This is a primary source becuase it is from the original document. by Nov 30
This is a good secondary source of the bill of rights because it gives you good additional infomation. by Nov 28
This is a good website because it has hard level English which means it was written by an adult and it has bullet points to list the information. by Nov 28
This website is good because it has a very good layout and the information is clear and easy to read. It shows the history of the bill of rights and in includes the rights of the constitution. It is a secondary source because it is not the original text. Here are three interesting facts which are included in the website.
1. King James the Second signed the English bill of rights.
2. Signed on the 13th February 1688.
3. The king tried to get rid of the protestant religion. by Nov 28
Sorry, my source is a secondary source by Nov 30
This commercial-free website offers a great deal of information that is written in an understandable, easy and fairly proportioned essay. It is written by very famous and reliable source( The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and The Bill of Rights: Inscribed on the Register 2011 ).
1) It is the basic set up of a constitutional government.
2) It provided a major decrease in the monarchs power.
3) It provided many rights that are vital and yet normal to all-day life (freedom of speech, to vote...). by Nov 28