Primary Source. This is a statement of the objectives of the 1628 English legal reform movement that led to the Civil War and deposing of Charles I in 1649.
It expresses many of the ideals that later led to the American Revolution. The Petition exhibited to his Majesty by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, concerning divers Rights and Liberties of the Subjects, with the King's Majesty's royal answer thereunto in full Parliament. To the King's Most Excellent Majesty, II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. Secondary Source. The Magna Carta (1215) Magna Carta, or “Great Charter,” signed by the King of England in 1215, was a turning point in human rights.
This is a good website for finding out about the petition of right because it has infromation about other things about rights as well as the petition. It also states some facts about the petition. It is a secondary source because it doesn't have the actual document on their website. 1. It has the four principles asserted in the document. 2. It has who initiated the document. and 3. It explains why it was made. – gen.c.gd
The Magna Carta, or “Great Charter,” was arguably the most significant early influence on the extensive historical process that led to the rule of constitutional law today in the English-speaking world.
Petition of Right. The Petition of Rights Petition; a request to a police official that seeks to correct a wrong or to influence public policy.
I think this is a good link because if someone that doesn't know anything about the subject reads it he would understand it because he wrote what the problem was. When you read it you would find it quite interesting so a reader would read the whole thing. I would think this is a reliable source because in other websites they state the same idea. Here are three reasons of why The Petition of Rights were important: 1. It limited the kings power which made him less powerfull and the citzens more powerful. 2. This agreement was denied by the king at first but then the commons forced him to sign it. 3. If the king was to make a new rule it would’ve had to go through the consent of the Parliament. – k.albassam
Right; to be able to do things freely.
When you put these two words together they mean freedom of speech, press, assembly, and it can also mean no man or woman can be taxed or convicted without the o.k. from the parliament. These words represent the Petition of Rights that were set forth in 1628 by King Charles I. Sir Edward Coke sent a request for a Petition of Rights to King Charles I, stating some of the following: “Some of your Majesty’s subjects have been put to death by some commissioners, because they were not following laws. What is the petition of rights. The Petition of Right (1628) The Petition of Right. "... on Saturday last the King gave a full and satisfactory answer to our petition concerning the liberty of the subject and propriety, and exemption of his person and estate from any illegal courses; which caused such expression of joy in general, as, where tongue left, bells and bonfires began; and the proceeding with the subsidies, which were till then at a stand, followed the next day in Parliament, and are ready to be passed entirely within two or three days.
I forgot to put this in my comment but it is a secondary source. It is secondary because it doesn't state the actual document. – charles.s
This is a good website because it gives fact, details, pictures and relate able examples. One of Mr. Meyer’s criteria for a good website is that if the author was’nt proud enough of the website to post their name, is it completely reliable or honest; probably not. Three reasons why the Petition of Rights was important: The Petition for bayed the king from instantaneous power and soldiers. The Petition stated that the king could not call for extra taxes unless the lords of that region specifically agreed. King Charles denied the Petition at first, but the commons for the first time pressed the matter against the king. – charles.s
" (Thomas Meautys to Lady Jane Corwallis, 12 June)
The Petition of Right, (1628) The early reign of Charles I and his attempt to rule without Parliament King Charles the First inherited the throne of the Three Kingdoms of England, Scotland and Ireland in 1625.
It think this is a good website because it has standard level text and has no errors and it is a reliable website. This is a secondary source because it is not a word to word document. Three facts: 1. King Charles and the Duke of Buckingham were determined to send another force to La Rochelle. 2. The Petition of Right was written on 17 March 1628 3. Charles agreed to the Petition on 7 June 1628. – mashael.a
He believed that his authority to rule was granted by God alone and was thus beyond earthly reproach or criticism.
He expected a subservient Parliament to fulfil its traditional role of raising revenue for the Crown by approving subsidies and taxes, but the King's religious authoritarianism and his unpopular foreign policies were out-of-step with the prevailing Puritanism of his most powerful subjects. King Charles holds court When Parliament refused to co-operate with him, King Charles decided to rule alone. Petition of Right. Petition of Right, 1628, a statement of civil liberties sent by the English Parliament to Charles I.
This is a good website because it’s really simple, sweet and short. It’s easy to read and understand. I might have to get a secondary source since this doesn't look very reliable. This is secondary source because it's not the orginial document and the information was taken from other websites because there's credit. 1. Sent from the English Parliament to Charles I 2. It’s a statement of civil liberties 3. When finally accepting the petition he was granted subsidies. – sophiesophie
Refusal by Parliament to finance the king's unpopular foreign policy had caused his government to exact forced loans and to quarter troops in subjects' houses as an economy measure.
Arbitrary arrest and imprisonment for opposing these policies had produced in Parliament a violent hostility to Charles and George Villiers, 1st duke of Buckingham. The Petition of Right, initiated by Sir Edward Coke, was based upon earlier statutes and charters and asserted four principles: no taxes may be levied without consent of Parliament; no subject may be imprisoned without cause shown (reaffirmation of the right of habeas corpus); no soldiers may be quartered upon the citizenry; martial law may not be used in time of peace.
In return for his acceptance (June, 1628), Charles was granted subsidies. Petition of Right"
I think that this scource is a secendary scource because it simplefies the whole document! – kayla3
Primary Source English Bill of Rights. English Bill of Rights 1689 An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown Whereas the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons assembled at Westminster, lawfully, fully and freely representing all the estates of the people of this realm, did upon the thirteenth day of February in the year of our Lord one thousand six hundred eighty-eight [old style date] present unto their Majesties, then called and known by the names and style of William and Mary, prince and princess of Orange, being present in their proper persons, a certain declaration in writing made by the said Lords and Commons in the words following, viz.
This is a good site because it is a primary source. Yale is a great law school in the United States so I trust their website to have accurate information. – sophiesophie
English Bill of Rights - English Bill Of Rights - Parliament, Freedom, King, and England. An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown The English Bill of Rights grew out of the Glorious Revolution of 1688.
During the revolution King James II abdicated and fled from England. He was succeeded by his daughter, Mary, and her husband, William of Orange, a Dutch prince. Parliament proposed a Declaration of Rights and presented it to William and Mary on February 13, 1689. Only after they accepted the declaration did Parliament proclaim them king and queen of England. Primary Source-Internet History Sourcebooks. Modern History Sourcebook: The Bill of Rights, 1689 Whereas the said late King James II having abdicated the government, and the throne being thereby vacant, his Highness the prince of Orange (whom it hath pleased Almighty God to make the glorious instrument of delivering this kingdom from popery and arbitrary power) did (by the advice of the lords spiritual and temporal, and diverse principal persons of the Commons) cause letters to be written to the lords spiritual and temporal, being Protestants, and other letters to the several counties, cities, universities, boroughs, and Cinque Ports, for the choosing of such persons to represent them, as were of right to be sent to parliament, to meet and sit at Westminster upon the two and twentieth day of January, in this year 1689, in order to such an establishment as that their religion, laws, and liberties might not again be in danger of being subverted; upon which letters elections have been accordingly made. 1.
I think that this website is really good because it has very good information and is from a college. There are a few problems with this source, it is a primary source, and has all kinds of CRAZY words! It also is hard to understand. It is good because the information is really exact. I guess that if you were in college (what this site is for) you could probably understand it better. •1. That the pretended power of suspending laws, or the execution of laws, by regal authority, without consent of parliament is illegal. •2. That the pretended power of dispensing with the laws, or the execution of law by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal. •3. That the commission for erecting the late court of commissioners for ecclesiastical causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious. Three facts. -ESG – ethang
EducationforFreedom. A Brief History of the Bill of Rights and the First Amendment The first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States became known as the Bill of Rights because they contained freedoms that Americans held to be their inalienable rights.
So important were these rights that several states insisted on a promise of amendments guaranteeing individual rights before they would ratify the Constitution. The Bill of Rights, ratified in 1791, was the result of more than a century of experience with rights in America and many centuries before that in England. The major British precursors to the Bill of Rights are: The Magna Carta (1215). In 1215, a group of English barons, tired of heavy taxes and arbitrary actions by the king, forced King John to sign the Magna Carta (Latin for “great charter”).
English Bill of Rights - English Bill Of Rights - Parliament, Freedom, King, and England.
I think the website I found here is a very good primary source beacause the information is very welll organized and it the whole bill is listed. In addition there are no comercials. – philippr
Primary Source: English Bill of Rights 1689. An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown Whereas the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons assembled at Westminster, lawfully, fully and freely representing all the estates of the people of this realm, did upon the thirteenth day of February in the year of our Lord one thousand six hundred eighty-eight [old style date] present unto their Majesties, then called and known by the names and style of William and Mary, prince and princess of Orange, being present in their proper persons, a certain declaration in writing made by the said Lords and Commons in the words following, viz.
. : FactMonster.com. English Bill of Rights. Contents Introduction. The English Bill of Rights and Its Influence on the United States Constitution. The English Bill of Rights and Its Influence on the Constitution Andrew Muchmore. English Bill of Rights 1689.
This is a good website because it has hard level English which means it was written by an adult and it has bullet points to list the information. – mashael.a
Primary Source English Bill of Rights. English Bill of Rights 1689 An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown Whereas the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons assembled at Westminster, lawfully, fully and freely representing all the estates of the people of this realm, did upon the thirteenth day of February in the year of our Lord one thousand six hundred eighty-eight [old style date] present unto their Majesties, then called and known by the names and style of William and Mary, prince and princess of Orange, being present in their proper persons, a certain declaration in writing made by the said Lords and Commons in the words following, viz. Living Heritage.
Sorry, my source is a secondary source – luisk
This commercial-free website offers a great deal of information that is written in an understandable, easy and fairly proportioned essay. It is written by very famous and reliable source( The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and The Bill of Rights: Inscribed on the Register 2011 ). 1) It is the basic set up of a constitutional government. 2) It provided a major decrease in the monarchs power. 3) It provided many rights that are vital and yet normal to all-day life (freedom of speech, to vote...). – luisk