background preloader

Nuclear Explosions in WTC

Facebook Twitter

Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK and Israel As Being the Actual 9/11 Terrorist. (Before It's News) An Exclusive You Have To See: The Last Frontier of Free Press Is Here!

Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK and Israel As Being the Actual 9/11 Terrorist

No More Censorship, Unlike YouTube and Others! 9/11: Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK And Israel Co-Conspirators The Millennium Report July 3, 2014. Check The Evidence - Re-exploding the WTC Nuclear Demolition Myth – The Mysterious Dimitri Khalezov. UPDATED 20th May 2010 - WITH RESPONSE FROM DIMITRI - SEE BOTTOMMay 19th 2010.

Check The Evidence - Re-exploding the WTC Nuclear Demolition Myth – The Mysterious Dimitri Khalezov

What May Have Melted The WTC Vehicles. Projects 57, 58, and 58A. 1957 - 1958: Nevada Test Site Last changed 20 September 1997 Project 57 This was an AEC-sponsored plutonium contamination hazard test of the XW-25 air defense warhead, which was expected to be widely deployed in large numbers, even within urban population centers.

Projects 57, 58, and 58A

The warhead contained plutonium and depleted uranium. No nuclear energy release occurred. Project 58 Los Alamos one-point safety test of device scheduled for firing in Operation Hardtack. Project 58/58A. Operation Project 58/58A[1] was a series of 4 nuclear tests conducted by the United States in 1957-1958 at the Nevada Test Site.

Project 58/58A

These tests followed the Operation Plumbbob series and preceded the Operation Hardtack I series. All the tests in Project 58 were one-point safety tests.[2] They were intended to freeze device designs prior to full-scale tests at Operation Hardtack I. No significant yield was expected from either, but the second, Coulomb-C, a surface test conducted on December 9, produced an unanticipated yield of 500 tons. Shortly after detonation, fallout readings of fifty roentgens per hour were recorded on the Mercury Highway, and, as the cloud moved toward the southwest, personnel at Jackass Flats involved in construction for future nuclear rocket testing were forced to take cover. Eventually, the cloud reached the Los Angeles area where very low readings briefly caused some public concern.[3]

1955%20-%20DNA%206030F%20-%20Safety%20Experiments%20Nov%201955%20-%20Mar%201958. Sandia National Laboratory Official List of UNEs in Nevada. ANNOUNCED_NAME Announced name for shot; should be same as "name" unless part of a multip event.

Sandia National Laboratory Official List of UNEs in Nevada

(text) ZULU_DATE Shot date (Greenwich) stored as YYMMDD. (integer) ZULU_TIME Greenwich mean time of detonation of shot (decimal). Format is XXXX.YYZZ where X=hours, Y=clock seconds, Z=decimal millisecond LATITUDE-LONGITUDE Geodetic coordinate of shot location (decimal). Format is DDD.MMSSHH where DDD=degrees,MM=minutes,SS=seconds, HH=hundredths of a second DOB Depth of burial of device in meters (decimal). ANNOUNCED_YLD What yield was announced for this shot? The Dimitri Khalezov "WTC was nuked" hoax. Revised 18 November, 2012: see here for transcript of Gordon Duff's admitting to writing 40% disinformation Introduction For years, various disinformation agents have been attempting to sabotage the 9/11 truth movement with claims that "mini-nukes" or "nuclear devices" were used to demolish the World Trade Center.

The Dimitri Khalezov "WTC was nuked" hoax

The fact that the Twin Towers and WTC7 (Building 7) were destroyed in a series of controlled demolitions is not in doubt; more than 1,400 architectural and engineering professionals have called for a new, truly independent investigation and cited evidence of controlled demolitions at all three collapsed WTC steel-framed high-rises. Pre-2001 studies found that the WTC Towers would survive a 600 mph impact from a jetliner, and predicted that the buildings would remain standing even if all of the jet fuel had been dumped inside and ignited a horrendous fire that killed many people. Nuclear weapon yield. Logarithmic scatterplot comparing the yield (in kilotons) and weight (in kilograms) of various nuclear weapons developed by the United States.

Nuclear weapon yield

The explosive yield of a nuclear weapon is the amount of energy discharged when a nuclear weapon is detonated, expressed usually in TNT equivalent (the standardized equivalent mass of trinitrotoluene which, if detonated, would produce the same energy discharge), either in kilotons (kt—thousands of tons of TNT) or megatons (Mt—millions of tons of TNT), but sometimes also in terajoules (1 kiloton of TNT = 4.184 TJ). Because the precise amount of energy released by TNT is and was subject to measurement uncertainties, especially at the dawn of the nuclear age, the accepted convention is that one kt of TNT is simply defined to be 1012 calories equivalent, this being very roughly equal to the energy yield of 1,000 tons of TNT.

The yield-to-weight ratio is the amount of weapon yield compared to the mass of the weapon. W54. The W54 was one of the smallest nuclear warheads deployed by the United States.

W54

It was a very compact implosion-type nuclear weapon design, designed for tactical use and had a very low yield for a nuclear weapon. Development[edit] The W54 was designed by Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory and built by the United States Atomic Energy Commission. Around 400 units were manufactured from 1961 until early 1962, and they were deployed until at least 1971. Preproduction testing[edit] Kilotons per kilogram. Nuclear weapons can be made to have pretty much as much of a bang as one wants to make them, but with increased explosive yield comes an increased weapon weight.

Kilotons per kilogram

We always talk vaguely about being able to make H-bombs to arbitrarily high yields, but recently I’ve been mulling over this fact somewhat quantitatively. I gave a talk last month at the History of Science Society Meeting on US interest in 50-100 MT bombs around the time of the Limited Test Ban Treaty, and while working on this paper I got slightly obsessed with what is known as the yield-to-weight ratio. Little Boy — a big bang compared to a conventional bomb, but still a very crude nuclear bomb. What makes nuclear weapons impressive and terrible is that their default yield-to-weight ratio — that is, the amount of bang per mass, usually expressed in terms of kilotons per kilogram (kt/kg) — is much, much higher than conventional explosives. Engineering and Design of Nuclear Weapons. Section 4.0 Engineering and Design of Nuclear Weapons Nuclear Weapons Frequently Asked Questions Version 2.04: 20 February 1999 COPYRIGHT CAREY SUBLETTE This material may be excerpted, quoted, or distributed freely provided that attribution to the author (Carey Sublette) and document name (Nuclear Weapons Frequently Asked Questions) is clearly preserved.

Engineering and Design of Nuclear Weapons

I would prefer that the user also include the URL of the source. Only authorized host sites may make this document publicly available on the Internet through the World Wide Web, anonymous FTP, or other means. Back to Main Index. 4.2 Fission Weapon Designs. Back to top of Section 4 4.2 Fission Weapon Designs The design elements outlined in the previous subsections can be applied in various ways to achieve a wide variety of weapon designs. The most appropriate design depends on the technology and material constraints within which the designer works, and what the design objective is (maximum efficiency, light weight, warhead volume and dimension restrictions, ruggedness, safety, etc.). The available fissile material is one of the most basic constraints in which there may be little flexibility.

In this subsection discuss some particular design approaches that have been taken (or might have been, since a lot of this is speculation) for various purposes. Project Orion (nuclear propulsion) An artist's conception of the NASA reference design for the Project Orion spacecraft powered by nuclear propulsion. Project Orion was a study of a spacecraft intended to be directly propelled by a series of explosions of atomic bombs behind the craft (nuclear pulse propulsion). Early versions of this vehicle were proposed to take off from the ground with significant associated nuclear fallout; later versions were presented for use only in space. The Orion concept offered high thrust and high specific impulse, or propellant efficiency, at the same time. The unprecedented extreme power requirements for doing so would be met by nuclear explosions, of such power relative to the vehicle's mass as to be survived only by using external detonations without attempting to contain them in internal structures.

How small can you make an atomic blast? Devin, I suggest that you have a careful read of the wikipedia article The basic fission reaction that occurs in a nuclear explosion involves (Neutron) + (Fissionable Isotope of large atom) → (Isotope of medium sized atom) + (Isotope of medium sized atom) + 3 or 4 (Neutron) For a nuclear explosion to occur, the average number of the product neutrons that trigger another reaction needs to be greater than 1. There are several things that can happen to neutrons that are produced as a product of a fission reaction (1) They can move out of the region where the fissionable material is(2) They can be absorbed by atoms other than the fissionable ones(3) They are usually very fast moving -- they can bounce around off other atoms a bit and gradually get slowed down, OR(4) If conditions are just right, they can collide with another fissionable atom, and produce another fission reaction. Win every 9/11 debate with this one fact ! Humint Events Online: Further thoughts on Radiation Readings from the WTC Nuking.

Did NYC Residents’ Geiger Counters Prove the Case? And then did NYC Criminalize Geiger Counters? By The Anonymous Physicist , Copyright 2011. All Rights Reserved. WTC Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndrome Fit All the Evidence. First Responder - "We Were Nuked on 9-11" In November, the heat from the underground fires were melting fireman's boots. My feet were hot as I walked across the rubble. I laugh when all these firemen and cops are portrayed as heroes for responding to 9/11. Nuclear Devices. Hard Evidence Supports the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes Were Used to Demolish the WTC Towers. By Don Fox and Jeff Prager. The Dimitri Khalezov "WTC was nuked" hoax.

9/11 TRUTH GOES NUCLEAR: Massive Download In Progress. 9/11 TRUTH GOES NUCLEAR: Massive Download In Progress. The Nuclear Demolition of the WTC. Undeniable Proof 9/11 WAS A NUCLEAR EVENT. 9/11: Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK And Israel Co-Conspirators. 9/11: Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK And Israel Co-Conspirators. 9/11 NUKE DEMOLITION PROOF: Firefighters Radiation Cancers “Off the Scale”

By Daily Mail Reporter Firefighters who recovered bodies at Ground Zero are developing cancer at a faster rate than those who worked before the atrocity, medical officials have revealed. WTC WAS DEMOLISHED BY HYDROGEN BOMB. 9-11 Review: ERROR: 'Nuclear Devices Were Used to Destroy the Twin Towers' The idea that nuclear devices, and in particular, 'mini-nukes', were used to destroy the Twin Towers has been promoted in a number of quarters, such as in the DVD 9/11 Eyewitness.

Radiation & Another One Of Those Endless 911 'Coincidences'... Nuclear 9/11 Revealed: Theories and Disinformation, the Misguided and the Inhuman. DOE Investigators Cite Veterans Today Investigations and Disclosures as Preventing a New 9/11. Officials Cite “Thermo-Nuke” in 9/11 Demo. The United States possesses and may well have used a devastating weapon designed to emulate terror attacks and even natural disasters. The “thermo-metric bomb”, a combination of illegal enhanced or “salted” radiation or “neutron bomb” and infrared/thermal booster, weighing in at 10,000 pounds, is controlled by a “shadow” parallel command structure at one time under the direct control of former Vice President Dick Cheney.

Today, no one knows who controls these weapons, deployed on the B2 bomber on specially modified bays or any place a storage container or delivery truck can be left uninspected. We do know this, they have been deployed, they have been used and “they work really well.” VT Nuclear Education: Undeniable Proof of 9/11 as a Nuclear Event. 9/11: Silencing those who report Israel’s role. Truth Gone Bad, How 9/11 Activists Have Failed. The Nuclear Demolition of the WTC. USGS Spectroscopy Lab - World Trade Center USGS environmental assessment. Spectroscopy Lab - World Trade Center USGS Chemistry Table. Redirect to another web page. Redirect to another web page. Page. The WTC demolition: atomic demolition vs nuclear demolition.

NEO – CIA Torture Report Ties Cheney/Bout to 9/11 Nukes. 9/11. 9/11 TRUTH GOES NUCLEAR: Massive Download In Progress. Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed. 9/11: Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK And Israel Co-Conspirators. IAEA investigators: Audit reveals US, not Iran the problem. VT Nuclear Education: Undeniable Proof of 9/11 as a Nuclear Event. 911thology Dimitri Khalezov. Doc Submitted By Russian Intel. Definitely not Mainstream - Nexus Artikle von German Nexus magazine Nov. 2010. Forensic Seismology Of 911 - Update. Pictures: US Boston Weapon – Both ‘Explosions’ – The Secret of the Pure Fusion Weapon – Li7 – Lithium 7. 9-11 Review: ERROR: 'Nuclear Devices Were Used to Destroy the Twin Towers' Update: Ed Ward MD On Suitcase Nukes, Why No WTC Radiation and Samuel Cohen Quotes on Residual Pure Fusion Neutron Bomb Radiation. Update: Witnesses Saw People ‘Vaporized’ on 9 11.