Donald Trump’s rageful white cult: Race, fear and the GOP front-runner’s slick manipulations. Donald Trump, the political necromancer, has been able to manipulate the death anxieties of right-wing voters for his own political gain. Trump won the New Hampshire primary by a substantial margin. If current public opinion polls are accurate, he will also win the Republican South Carolina primary as well. Trump’s base of white working-class authoritarians is scared of what they view as a “new” America, one in which they believe that the psychological and material wages of Whiteness will not be as great. A combination of the brain structures and cognitive processes of conservative-authoritarians, socialization by family and community, and disinformation from the right-wing “news” entertainment complex, reinforce those anxieties while also ginning up deep feelings of racial resentment toward non-whites. Donald Trump is not necessarily the prime instigator or cause of those fears; he is just the Republican candidate who is most adept at manipulating them.
There, I wrote: To wit. The Forum – Democracy or Decision-Making by Experts? Fabienne Peter on whether difficult political decisions should be made by experts Can democracy be trusted to make the right decisions? Critics of democracy tend to argue that democracy cannot be trusted in this way. They point to the difficult decisions that democratic societies face today—with regard to climate change, for example, or rising inequalities in income and wealth. Democracy is out of place in these decision-making contexts, these critics argue, because democratic citizens are too ignorant and too prone to cognitive biases and errors to be able to make the right decisions; experts should make such decisions. Defenders of democracy have tried to refute this objection by pursuing two main strategies.
The second strategy aims to show that democracy can be trusted to make the right decisions and that it should be trusted to the extent that it does. The epistemic strategy might look like promising because it takes on the critics of democracy on their own terms. David Barton's Appalling Lie that the Constitution Puts God's Law Above Man's Law. From the Religious Right’s response to Kim Davis’ arrest, you would think none of them had ever heard of the United States Constitution. David Barton, the Religious Right’s premier fake historian, in Houston to attend Deputy Darren Goforth’s funeral, proclaimed that “the Founding Fathers made it real clear that the laws of God are higher than the laws of man.” According to Barton, “This is a law of God. Man’s law is not allowed to contradict God’s law.”
In fact, it is exactly the opposite. The United States Constitution was written by those same Founding Fathers to put humans, not deities, in the driver’s seat, that political power derives from the hands of the people and the consent of the governed. Watch courtesy of Right Wing Watch: Barton must have a special copy of the Constitution, one nobody else has ever seen, because nowhere did the Founding Fathers say God’s law was the law of the land. Seems pretty cut and dried, doesn’t it? When does your religion legally excuse you from doing part of your job? Several hundred people demonstrated their support for County Clerk Kim Davis in Kentucky as she spent her third day in jail on contempt charges. Davis has refused to issue marriage licenses to gay couples. (AP) Can your religion legally excuse you from doing part of your job? This is one of the questions in the Kentucky County Clerk marriage certificate case. But it also arises in lots of other cases — for instance, the Muslim flight attendant who doesn’t want to serve alcohol and who filed a complaint on Tuesday with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission over the airline’s denial of an exemption.
The question has also arisen before with regard to: And of course it arises routinely when people are fine with their job tasks, but have a religious objection to doing them on particular days (e.g., Saturdays and Fridays after sundown). Now I’m not saying this to praise the law, or to claim that it’s demanded by vital principles of religious principles. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. America’s silent-but-deadly billionaires: How our tight-lipped overlords are waging stealth campaigns against the middle class. Teddy Roosevelt famously argued that, when it comes to foreign policy, one should “Speak softly, and carry a big stick.” Similarly, an apt summation of the political inclinations of billionaires might be, “Speak softly, and carry a big check.” While some billionaires, like Warren Buffett, are outspoken on political issues, most tend to say very little, or speak in vague generalities.
But a new working paper by political scientists Benjamin Page, Jason Seawright and Matthew Lacombe finds that what billionaires say and what they do are dramatically different. While billionaires rarely go on the record discussing Social Security and taxes, they work behind the scenes to oppose policies favored by average Americans. The new study examines an even smaller and more insular group than the previous work of Page and Seawright: the richest 100 American billionaires. The authors dub this “stealth politics.” The billionaires the authors examined were rather active politically. Here's How Religious Exemption Laws Can Hurt Women And The LGBT Community. Susan Jacoby on American Ignorance. BILL MOYERS: It's not only the reality of our finances we are running from. In her new book published just this week, one of America's most prolific and provocative free thinkers says we are in a headlong flight from reason.
The book is The Age of American Unreason, and it couldn't be more timely. Here's an excerpt: "It remains to be seen, as the current presidential campaign unfolds, whether Americans are willing to consider what the flight from reason has cost us as a people and whether any candidate has the will or the courage to talk about ignorance as a political issue affecting everything from scientific research to decisions about war and peace. " The Age of American Unreason offers an unsparing description of what Susan Jacoby calls "an overarching crisis of memory and knowledge".
Susan Jacoby is the program director of the Center for Inquiry in New York. SUSAN JACOBY: Oh, it's wonderful to be back. SUSAN JACOBY: Folks. BILL MOYERS: — folks — BILL MOYERS: — about the folks. No. The Transformation of American Democracy to Oligarchy | Akbar Ganji. The United States has the world's largest economy, is the most important contributor to scientific advancements, has the most powerful military and some of the best universities in the world, is a democratic state, and accepts more immigrants than any other nation. But, over time the democratic foundations of the United States, equality of the citizens and their human rights, have been eroding.
It is impossible to make inequality a pillar of the structure of the state and deepen its roots, and yet to be proud and claim that the citizens have equal voting rights. When all types of inequalities take deep roots and expand, citizens lose their power to influence the political process. Let us take a look at some facts. Discrimination against the American Dream Tens of millions of people in the United States are living their lives below the first threshold. Democracy of the Rich The inverse relation between the economic power and democracy can also be analyzed from another perspective.
Chinese Government Arrests Dozens Of Lawyers In Unprecedented Sweep - BuzzFee... “Race is being used to wreck the middle class”: The silent bigotry of America... Progressives have long argued that conservatives play up racial resentments to undermine the welfare state. Conservatives tend to respond to such accusations with their own charges of liberal “race baiting.” But whatever right-wing voices might say on the matter, a new analysis of the data suggests that racism does, in fact, strongly predict welfare spending. Using two surveys from 2008, Douglas Spencer and Christopher Elmendorf estimated racial resentment across the states by measuring responses to questions about the work ethic, intelligence and trustworthiness of blacks Americans.
They estimate the portion of whites in each state that are in the top quartile of racial resentment (so a state with large amounts of racism would have more than 25 percent of whites espousing racially biased views). I combined this with data from the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities showing Temporary Assistance for Needy Families benefits for a single-parent household of three.
Welcome to feudalism, America: How the 1 percent is systematically destroying... People Agree with Jon Stewart More Than Any Conservative Commentator, Poll Finds. 6 Political Theorists Introduced in Animated "School of Life" Videos: Marx, Smith, Rawls & More.
“It may come as a surprise to some academics,” writes leftist political theorist Michael Parenti in his sprawling textbook Democracy for the Few, “but there is a marked relationship between economic power and political power.” Parenti exaggerates—I have never met such an academic in a humanities department, though it may be true in the worlds of political philosophy and political science. Yet in centuries past, philosophers and scholars had no trouble drawing conclusions about the intertwining of the political and the economic.
One may immediately think of Karl Marx, who—according to the above video from a new School of Life series on famous political theorists—was “capitalism’s most famous and ambitious critic.” The practical effects of Marx’s political ideas may be anathema for good reason, Alain de Botton admits, but his economic analysis deserves continued attention. Like Adam Smith, Henry David Thoreau’s politics seem a little harder to pin down. Related Content: A Point of View: Is the US president an elected monarch? President Obama has been accused of acting like a monarch. But the US presidency has been an elected kingship since 1776 in all but name, argues the historian David Cannadine. After five weeks of campaigning, which may have seemed unending and interminable at the time, but which in retrospect passed relatively quickly, the British general election is over, and David Cameron is once again ensconced in 10 Downing Street.
But although the votes will not be cast until November 2016, the battle for the American Presidency has already begun, as several Republicans and Democrats, with varying degrees of plausibility, have recently declared themselves as candidates for their party's nomination. Yet there are 18 months to go until that election, and Barack Obama will not actually vacate the White House until his successor is inaugurated in Washington DC in January 2017.
TR's distant cousin and eventual successor, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, was no less kingly a president. Taiwan and Strategic Security. When Japan bombed Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, it also simultaneously attacked the Philippines, triggering World War II in the Pacific. It was the opening salvo in the Japanese Empire’s campaign to invade and subjugate Southeast Asia in pursuit of its Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere. The bombers were launched from the island of Taiwan, which was then under Japanese military rule. It was the jumping-off point for the attacks on both the Philippines and the Dutch East Indies (now Indonesia). Throughout the war, Taiwan served as the staging area and major supply base that sustained Japan’s armies in Southeast Asia and as the control point for all shipping through the Taiwan Strait.
The U.S. State Department at the time stated that strategically no location in the Far East, with the exception of Singapore, occupied such a controlling position. Taiwan’s geography tells the story. Choke Points ‘Unsinkable Aircraft Carrier’ President Dwight D. Taiwan Relations Act The U.S. Joseph A. “Does the Constitution Follow the Flag?” “Never during my three years as a law student or two years as a law clerk at federal courts did I hear of the ‘Insular Cases.’
Yet the series of US Supreme Court decisions gathered under this name established a doctrine, in force to this day, determining that the US Constitution does not apply fully to territories acquired through conquest after the Spanish-American War and the signing of the Treaty of Paris in 1898.” So writes Harvard Law School Dean Martha Minow in her Preface to Reconsidering the Insular Cases: The Past and Future of the American Empire, the latest publication from Harvard Law School’s Human Rights Program. The volume grew out of a February 2014 conference at Harvard that was organized to interrogate this century-old series of Supreme Court decisions that, judging by Minow’s experience, aren’t often given the attention they deserve. As Juan R. In his Introduction to the book, excerpted below, Harvard Law School professor Gerald L. These Studies Show How 'The Fox Effect' Pushed Congress, Country To The Right. Since Fox founder and chairman Roger Ailes opened shop in 1996, the effects of the powerhouse conservative channel on the media landscape have been widely noted.
Bartlett, a onetime advisor to Rep. Ron Paul and President Ronald Reagan and official in the administration George H.W. Bush, cites several studies showing how Fox broke into an untapped market for a single conservative news source after years of FCC regulations which required equal time for political debate (the so-called "fairness doctrine" ended in 1987 under President Reagan.) But Barlett also surfaced studies which show that that the Fox Effect changed not only Americans' media diet, but their political behavior as well — boosting turnout for the GOP and pushing both Republicans and Democrats rightward in Congress. Meanwhile, a 2014 study by The National Bureau of Economic Research found that the likelihood of voting Republican increased by 0.9 points among viewers who watched "four additional minutes per week. " China's War against International Law in the South China Sea. In medieval times, alchemists sought to transmute base metals into gold.
Today, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is engaged in the geopolitical equivalent of alchemy in the South China Sea, as it seeks to transform reefs into islands. The Pentagon’s annual report on Chinese military capabilities notes that, for the last year, China has been reclaiming land at five of the reefs under its control in the South China Sea. The PRC is already building major infrastructure on four of these artificial islands. At least two of them—Fiery Cross Reef and Subi Reef—are getting airstrips. Beijing views these actions as “lawful and justified,” since they are occurring on Chinese territory. As the Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi emphasized at the National People’s Congress earlier this year, China is building on “its own islands and reefs.” As important, China characterizes these actions are “necessary.” The American approach is not new. Chomsky: 'International law cannot be enforced against great powers’ FULL INTERVIEW.
Uk.businessinsider. Pew Finds Americans Value Privacy, Distrust Government, Tech Firms - BuzzFeed News. Britain resigns as a world power. On Monday, the Right Honorable David Cameron, prime minister of Great Britain, gave his first major speech after being reelected to his high office — once held by Pitt, Gladstone, Disraeli, Lloyd George, Churchill and Thatcher. Confronting a world of challenges — including Greece’s possible exit from the euro, a massive migration crisis on Europe’s shores, Ukraine’s perilous state, Russia’s continued intransigence, the advance of the Islamic State and the continuing chaos in the Middle East — Cameron chose to talk about . . . a plan to ensure that hospitals in the United Kingdom will be better staffed on weekends.
Fareed Zakaria writes a foreign affairs column for The Post. He is also the host of CNN’s Fareed Zakaria GPS and a contributing editor for The Atlantic. View Archive Facebook Okay, that’s a bit unfair. Over the next few years, Britain’s army will shrink to about 80,000. NATO members are supposed to maintain defense spending at 2 percent of their gross domestic product. Former North Korean spy reveals tactics. What Causes Poor Uneducated White People Vote Republican? Democracy by Force: US Military Intervention in the Post-Cold War World (London School of Economics Mathematics) | BooksOnTheMove.
It’s Time To Talk About ‘British Values’ Lawrence Lessig: The problem with American democracy in three charts. The Illusion Of Democracy. Reason Roundtable: Is Reform Conservatism a Friend or Foe of Limited Government? China’s military has declared war on Western thought on the internet. Chinese Army newspaper calls for military role in Internet culture war. PressTV-‘US making arms for possible China war’ Bin Ladin's Bookshelf. Constitution Revolution: How One Amendment is Actually Unraveling the Constitution. As Americans become more liberal, will Supreme Court follow on gay marriage?
DOX: How Scientology ensnares the unsuspecting in a series of binding contracts. How the United States Economically and Politically Strangled Puerto Rico. Napoleon: the Emperor Distilled.