background preloader

Y13 WJEC Resources

Facebook Twitter

WJEC Studies in Religion and Ethics A2. Revision. Nicomachean Ethics. Objection by ProfessorHinkley, April 06, 2014.

Nicomachean Ethics

Analytic–synthetic distinction - Wikipedia. The analytic–synthetic distinction (also called the analytic–synthetic dichotomy) is a semantic distinction, used primarily in philosophy to distinguish propositions (in particular, statements that are affirmative subject–predicate judgments) into two types: analytic propositions and synthetic propositions.

Analytic–synthetic distinction - Wikipedia

Analytic propositions are true by virtue of their meaning, while synthetic propositions are true by how their meaning relates to the world.[1] However, philosophers have used the terms in very different ways. Furthermore, philosophers have debated whether there is a legitimate distinction. Kant[edit] Conceptual containment[edit] A Priorism in Moral Epistemology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) 1.

A Priorism in Moral Epistemology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Preliminaries 1.1 A Priori Knowledge and Justification: The Standard View. GCE Religious Studies Spec 2009 onwards (31 03 14) Are Designer Babies Our Future? You’ve read one of your four complimentary articles for this month.

Are Designer Babies Our Future?

You can read four articles free per month. To have complete access to the thousands of philosophy articles on this site, please SUBSCRIBE! Bioethics & Medical Ethics. Religious belief: A natural phenomenon. Suppose the government runs random screening for a very rare mutation – Mutation X – present in one in every million.

Religious belief: A natural phenomenon

The test is 99% accurate. If your result is positive, does this mean that you probably have Mutation X? No. Imagine that there are 100 million people, of which 100 are X-carriers and 99,999,900 are not. Possible Exam Question. Religious Experience. Mysticism. Corporate Religious Experience Watford Boys. Religious Experience Cirencester SFC. UNIT 2 7.Religious Experience. Religious Experience - Philosophical Investigations. St. Teresa of Avila HD. The Varieties of Religious Experience by William James. Humans believe in GOD because religion fulfills our 16 basic desires. The creation of the universe According Gerald Schroeder believes time when the universe was created was about a trillion times slower, due to what he calls the 'stretching factor' in Einstein's equations.

Humans believe in GOD because religion fulfills our 16 basic desires

Einstein's model of 'general relativity,' the faster things go, the slower time moves. And Schroeder says because light moves so fast, it affects time. Schroeder argues this might explain how God could have created the universe in six days - each of the creator's days lasted 24 trillion hours. This would be about 14 billion years. Life on Earth came out of clay The Bible, Koran and even Greek mythology claim that all life on Earth came from clay.

A study in 2013 attempted to back up these claims. The process takes billions of years, during which the chemicals react to each other to form proteins, DNA and, eventually, living cells, scientists told the journal Scientific Reports. Adam and Eve He used a complicated mathematical model to work backwards through our DNA genealogy. Religious experience is a good pointer to the existence of God! Discuss (40) Lecture 11: Mind Your Motive – Harvard Justice. A brief overview of the reading: The Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) is one of the most important works of moral philosophy ever written.

Lecture 11: Mind Your Motive – Harvard Justice

In the Groundwork, Kant argues that morality is based neither on the principle of utility, nor on a law of nature, but on human reason. According to Kant, reason tells us what we ought to do, and when we obey our own reason, only then are we truly free. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) By Immanuel Kant Translated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott Ancient Greek philosophy was divided into three sciences: physics, ethics, and logic. Lecture 12: The Supreme Principle Of Morality – Harvard Justice. A brief overview of the reading: The Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) is one of the most important works of moral philosophy ever written.

Lecture 12: The Supreme Principle Of Morality – Harvard Justice

In the Groundwork, Kant argues that morality is based neither on the principle of utility, nor on a law of nature, but on human reason. According to Kant, reason tells us what we ought to do, and when we obey our own reason, only then are we truly free. Lecture 13: A Lesson In Lying – Harvard Justice. What is justice?

Lecture 13: A Lesson In Lying – Harvard Justice

According to the philosopher John Rawls, principles of justice are the outcome of a special kind of agreement. They are the principles that we would all agree to if we were choosing rules for our society and no one had any unfair bargaining power. But how can we ensure that no one has any unfair bargaining power?

Kantian Ethics Past Questions. KANT. KantEthicsNotes. Strengths weaknesses kant. Kant perfect imperfect duties. RS3 Revision Checklist. Lecture 18: What’s The Purpose? – Harvard Justice. A short overview of the reading; Many rights-oriented philosophers believe that distributive justice is not a matter of rewarding virtue or moral desert, and that the measure of a just society is not whether it produces virtuous citizens, but whether it provides a fair framework of rights within which individuals can pursue their own values.

Lecture 18: What’s The Purpose? – Harvard Justice

Aristotle (384-322 BC) rejects both of these beliefs. He believes that justice consists in giving people what they deserve, and that a just society is one that enables human beings to realize their highest nature and to live the good life. For Aristotle, political activity is not merely a way to pursue our interests, but an essential part of the good life. Aristotle, The Politics Translated by Benjamin Jowett BOOK ONEPart I Every state is a community of some kind, and every community is established with a view to some good; for mankind always act in order to obtain that which they think good. Part II “First house and wife and an ox for the plough, ” Lecture 19: The Good Citizen – Harvard Justice. A brief overview of the case: Should a golfer with a congenital leg disease have the right to use a golf cart in professional golf tournaments? In the case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin (2000), the justices of the US Supreme Court disagreed. Their disagreement turned in part on competing views about whether walking the course is essential to the game of golf.

To what extent does the debate about using golf carts call into question the athletic nature of golf and the honor due to those who excel at it? PGA Tour, Inc. v. Lecture 20: Freedom VS. Fit – Harvard Justice. A brief overview of the case: Should a golfer with a congenital leg disease have the right to use a golf cart in professional golf tournaments? In the case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. What does it mean to be good Virtue. VirtueTheory tere. Virtue ethics booklet. Phronesis. 02 Virtue Ethics Past Questions. 01 WJEC Notes Virtue Ethics. 01 Virtue Ethics peped version. Three-person baby licence granted. Image copyright Thinkstock Doctors in Newcastle have been given the first UK licence to create babies from two women and one man, the fertility regulator says. The advanced form of IVF will be used to prevent children dying from genetic diseases.

The team at the Newcastle Fertility Centre said it was "good news" and a "momentous day" for patients. And realistically expect the first child to be born in 2018 at the earliest. The procedure aims to overcome mitochondrial diseases which leave people with insufficient energy to keep their heart beating. Some families have lost multiple children to the disease. It is passed down from only the mother - so a technique using a donor egg as well as the mother's egg and father's sperm has been developed. Cosmological Past Questions.

Cosmological Arguments Knowledge Organiser. Teleological Argument Knowledge Organiser.