George Soros Open Society Institute CIA Inquiry on Wikileaks. 10 August 2010 Subject: FW: Site Submission From Contact Us Form Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:31:36 -0400 From: "Amy P.
Weil" <AWeil[at]sorosny.org> To: <cryptome[at]earthlink.net> Dear John Young, Thank you for your query. The Open Society Foundations do not support Wikileaks.org. Best regards, Amy Weil soros-osi-2006.zip George Soros OSI Foundation Tax Report 2006 August 10, 2010 (5.7MB) soros-osi-2007.zip George Soros OSI Foundation Tax Report 2007 August 10, 2010 (5.7MB) 9 August 2010. Soros-osi-2008.zip George Soros OSI Foundation Tax Report 2008 August 9, 2010 (6.7MB) No obvious mention of Wikileaks in the report. 9 August 2010 George Soros Open Society Institute Inquiry on Wikileaks A writes: I've been following coverage of Wikileaks' release of the Afghan Diaries closely, and have admired your skepticism.
Thank you for taking the time to read this far, and allow me to voice my concern. Cryptome request submitted 9 August 2010 to: Thank you very much. Sincerely, Contact. Zeitgeist: Cryptome Definitively Supports WikiLeaks. Posted by barry You may have read in the media (the Guardian, for example) that Cryptome.org has claimed WikiLeaks.org is a 'C.I.A. front'.
This comes from a quote by John Young of Cryptome in an email from 2007 and Cryptome says the reporting of this is 'lacking context'. Cryptome is also saying this: 'Characterisitcally, none of the authoritative ignoramouses quoting Young to smear Wikileaks talked to Young to get an update, haven't studied much Wikileaks material beyond the headlines, and would not stoop to the hard-labor of reading Cryptome. Cryptome attacked the Mother Jones smear on 8 April: "The smears of Wikileaks are becoming excessive. 'Cryptome spoke with Julian Assange by telephone on 11 April to offer support against the attacks on him and Wikileaks for releasing the Reuters staff murder video. See also: The Cryptome-WikiLeaks emails from 2007. John Young interviewed by cnet, 20 July 2010 (critical of WikiLeaks but not accusatory). Posted by barry at April 14, 2010 10:30 PM. 0002/cia102510.pdf. Wikileaks Leak. *** PGP Signature Status: unknown *** Signer: xxxxxxxxxxxxx *** Signed: 10/3/2006 8:16:00 PM *** Verified: 10/4/2006 8:32:09 AM *** BEGIN PGP DECRYPTED/VERIFIED MESSAGE *** Dear John, You knew me under another name from cypherpunk days.
I am involved in a project that you may have feeling for. I will not mention its name yet incase you feel yu are not able to be involved. The project is a mass document leaking project that requires someone with backbone to hold the .org domain registration. We would like that person to be someone who is not privy to the location of the master servers which are otherwise obscured by technical means. We expect the domain to come under the usual political and legal pressure. John Young agreed to do so by encrypted message, undecryptable by JY. [A decrypted PGP message.] To: jya[a t]pipeline.com From: Subject: Welcome to list xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 23:48:40 -0800 (PST) Welcome to list xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.