background preloader

Ofelija100

Facebook Twitter

Ofelija

Ofi

The 4 Most Common Relationship Problems. Relationship problems.

The 4 Most Common Relationship Problems

Everybody has them. And sometimes you have them over and over and over. Most of the people giving advice don’t know the research. So where are the real answers? I decided to call an expert: Dr. You might remember him as the researcher in Malcolm Gladwell’s Blink who, after just a few minutes, could predict whether a couple would end up divorced. John is a professor emeritus at the University of Washington and co-founder of the Gottman Institute. He’s also a really cool guy. So what are you going to learn here? The four things that doom relationships.The three things that prevent those four things.The most important part of any relationship conversation.The single best predictor of whether a relationship is working. Love is Not Enough. In 1967, John Lennon wrote a song called, “All You Need is Love.”

Love is Not Enough

Afraid of Love: 2 Fears That Keep People Single. Could you possibly be afraid of falling in love?

Afraid of Love: 2 Fears That Keep People Single

Watch out for these telltale signs, and finally free yourself to attract a genuine, loving relationship. Fear is a funny thing. When you’re in a scary situation—say you’re confronted by a bear—it’s easy to know what you’re feeling. You’re afraid. And you know that what’s causing the fear is a very definite threat to your physical well being. Fear has a purpose. When it comes to relationships, fear is a bit harder to identify. We’ve found that relationship-based fears (some call it “fear of intimacy”) tend to come in two flavors. 6 Toxic Relationship Habits Most People Think Are Normal. There’s no class in high school on how to not be a shitty boyfriend or girlfriend.

Sure, they teach us the biology of sex, the legality of marriage, and maybe we read a few obscure love stories from the 19th century on how not to be. But when it comes down to actually handling the nitty-gritty of relationships, we’re given no pointers… or worse, we’re given advice columns in women’s magazines.

Yes, it’s trial-and-error from the get-go. And if you’re like most people, it’s been mostly error. Spiritual intelligence. Spiritual intelligence is a term used by some philosophers, psychologists, and developmental theorists to indicate spiritual parallels with IQ (Intelligence Quotient) and EQ (Emotional Quotient).

Spiritual intelligence

Danah Zohar coined the term "spiritual intelligence" and introduced the idea in 1997 in her book ReWiring the Corporate Brain.[1] Howard Gardner, the originator of the theory of multiple intelligences, chose not to include spiritual intelligence amongst his "intelligences" due to the challenge of codifying quantifiable scientific criteria.[2] Instead, Gardner suggested an "existential intelligence" as viable.[3] However, contemporary researchers continue explore the viability of Spiritual Intelligence (often abbreviated as "SQ") and to create tools for measuring and developing it. So far, measurement of spiritual intelligence has tended to rely on self-assessment instruments, which some claim can be susceptible to false reporting.

Definitions[edit] David B. BILINGUAL GLOSSARY OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL QUALIFIERS OF INTELLIGENCE. - Designates the cognitive abilities of a community as a result of multiple interactions between members, or agents,

BILINGUAL GLOSSARY OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL QUALIFIERS OF INTELLIGENCE

Theory of multiple intelligences. The theory of multiple intelligences is a theory of intelligence that differentiates it into specific (primarily sensory) "modalities", rather than seeing intelligence as dominated by a single general ability.

Theory of multiple intelligences

This model was proposed by Howard Gardner in his 1983 book Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Gardner articulated seven criteria for a behavior to be considered an intelligence.[1] These were that the intelligences showed: potential for brain isolation by brain damage, place in evolutionary history, presence of core operations, susceptibility to encoding (symbolic expression), a distinct developmental progression, the existence of savants, prodigies and other exceptional people, and support from experimental psychology and psychometric findings. Gardner argues intelligence is categorized into three primary or overarching categories, those of which are formulated by the abilities. The different abilities[edit]

Social Intelligence Lab. Social intelligence. Social intelligence is the capacity to effectively negotiate complex social relationships and environments.[1] Psychologist Nicholas Humphrey believes that it is social intelligence, rather than quantitative intelligence, that defines humans.

Social intelligence

Social scientist Ross Honeywill believes social intelligence is an aggregated measure of self- and social-awareness, evolved social beliefs and attitudes, and a capacity and appetite to manage complex social change. A person with a high social intelligence quotient (SQ) is no better or worse than someone with a low SQ, but they have different attitudes, hopes, interests and desires.[2] Www.psychometriclab.com/Default.aspx?Content=Page&id=14.

Obtaining the TEIQue TEIQue ♦ Download the TEIQue v. 1.50 in pdf from here and in Microsoft WORD from here.

www.psychometriclab.com/Default.aspx?Content=Page&id=14

A detailed description of the 15 TEIQue facets and 4 factors is available from here. You need not use in your study our demographics form. TEIQue-SF ♦ Download the TEIQue-SF, along with the scoring key and a brief description of the instrument, from here in pdf and here in Microsoft WORD. TEIQue-AF ♦ Download the TEIQue-AF from here. Internal objects - melanie klein trust. The Secrets of Self-Management from the Masters. Intelligence « Psychology Blog. Posts tagged with intelligence According to palaeontologists (scientists who study fossils), over the last 20,000 years the average volume has been decreasing – possibly losing as much as 150cc (a chunk the size of a tennis ball).

intelligence « Psychology Blog

One possible explanation is related to the fact that brain size is correlated with body size. Humans have become smaller over the millennia. Early humans were much brawnier for hunting and also for dealing with cold climates, but now we are smaller and therefore our brains have become correspondingly smaller. Another possibility is that brain structure has become more efficient so that fewer cells and connections are needed. On the other hand, cognitive psychologist David Geary proposes that our brains are getting smaller because we are becoming more stupid. Surprisingly the only non-vertebrate animal protected by the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act is the octopus.

Pointing to the octopus as a relatively intelligent animal.