Rhetoric & Fallacies
Get flash to fully experience Pearltrees
Fallacy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In logic and rhetoric , a fallacy is usually an improper argumentation in reasoning often resulting in a misconception or presumption. Literally, a fallacy is "an error in reasoning that renders an argument logically invalid". [ 1 ] By accident or design, fallacies may exploit emotional triggers in the listener or participant ( appeal to emotion ), or take advantage of social relationships between people (e.g. argument from authority ). Fallacious arguments are often structured using rhetorical patterns that obscure any logical argument. Though an argument is not "logically valid", it is not necessarily the case that the conclusion is incorrect. It simply means that the conclusion cannot be arrived at using that argument. Though often used unintentionally, fallacies can be used purposefully to win arguments regardless of the merits.
Ø Illicit Major : the predicate of the conclusion talks about all of something, but the premises only mention some cases of the term in the predicate Ø Illicit Minor : the subject of the conclusion talks about all of something, but the premises only mention some cases of the term in the subject
Stephen Downes Guide to the Logical Fallacies
List of Fallacies
A formal fallacy is an error in logic that can be seen in the argument's form without an understanding of the argument's content. All formal fallacies are specific types of non sequiturs . [ edit ] Propositional fallacies A propositional fallacy is an error in logic that concerns compound propositions.
Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860), was a brilliant German philosopher. These 38 Stratagems are excerpts from "The Art of Controversy", first translated into English and published in 1896. Carry your opponent's proposition beyond its natural limits; exaggerate it. The more general your opponent's statement becomes, the more objections you can find against it. The more restricted and narrow his or her propositions remain, the easier they are to defend by him or her.
SCHOPENHAUER'S 38 STRATAGEMS, OR 38 WAYS TO WIN AN ARGUMENT
The Art of Being Right - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument (1831) ( Eristische Dialektik: Die Kunst, Recht zu Behalten ) is an acidulous and sarcastic treatise written by the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer in sarcastic deadpan. [ 1 ] In it, Schopenhauer examines a total of thirty-eight methods of showing up one's opponent in a debate. He introduces his essay with the idea that philosophers have concentrated in ample measure on the rules of logic , but have not (especially since the time of Immanuel Kant ) engaged with the darker art of the dialectic , of controversy. Whereas the purpose of logic is classically said to be a method of arriving at the truth, dialectic, says Schopenhauer, "...on the other hand, would treat of the intercourse between two rational beings who, because they are rational, ought to think in common, but who, as soon as they cease to agree like two clocks keeping exactly the same time, create a disputation, or intellectual contest."Rhétorique - Wikipédia
La Rhétorique désigne l'art ou la technique de persuader , généralement au moyen du langage . Ce mot provient du latin rhetorica , emprunté au grec ancien ῥητορικὴ τέχνη ( rhêtorikê tekhnê ), qui se traduit par « technique, art oratoire » , et désigne au sens propre « l'art de bien parler », d'après le nom rhêtôr , « orateur ». Elle est née au V e siècle av. J.‑C. en Sicile , selon la légende, puis fut introduite à Athènes par le sophiste Gorgias , où elle se développa dans les activités judiciaires et politiques.
Trained as an anthropologist, Gabriella (Biella) Coleman examines the ethics of online collaboration/institutions as well as the role of the law and digital media in sustaining various forms of political activism. Between 2001-2003 she conducted ethnographic research on computer hackers primarily in San Francisco, the Netherlands, as well as those hackers who work on the largest free software project, Debian. Her first book, "Coding Freedom: The Aesthetics and the Ethics of Hacking" is forthcoming with Princeton University Press and she is currently working on a new book on Anonymous and digital activism. She is the recipient of numerous grants, fellowships, and awards, including ones from the National Science Foundation, the Woodrow Wilson Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Social Science Research Council and the Institute for Advanced Study.
Gabriella Coleman - Faculty Bio
La langue de bois ! Un langage que tout présidentiable sérieux se doit de maîtriser. Eluder les questions embarrassantes, parler pour ne rien dire, brosser l'électeur dans le sens du poil, autant d'exercices dans lesquels la plupart des hommes politiques excelle. Mais la campagne est longue.
Générateur de langue de bois
Fallacies
Dr. Michael C. Labossiere, the author of a Macintosh tutorial named Fallacy Tutorial Pro 3.0, has kindly agreed to allow the text of his work to appear on the Nizkor site, as a Nizkor Feature. It remains © Copyright 1995 Michael C. Labossiere, with distribution restrictions -- please see our copyright notice . If you have questions or comments about this work, please direct them both to the Nizkor webmasters ( webmaster@nizkor.org ) and to Dr.
Logical Fallacies
An Encyclopedia of Errors of Reasoning The ability to identify logical fallacies in the arguments of others, and to avoid them in one’s own arguments, is both valuable and increasingly rare. Fallacious reasoning keeps us from knowing the truth, and the inability to think critically makes us vulnerable to manipulation by those skilled in the art of rhetoric. What is a Logical Fallacy? A logical fallacy is, roughly speaking, an error of reasoning.
A fallacy is a kind of error in reasoning. The alphabetical list below contains 207 names of the most common fallacies, and it provides brief explanations and examples of each of them. Fallacies should not be persuasive, but they often are. Fallacies may be created unintentionally, or they may be created intentionally in order to deceive other people. The vast majority of the commonly identified fallacies involve arguments, although some involve explanations, or definitions, or other products of reasoning. Sometimes the term “fallacy” is used even more broadly to indicate any false belief or cause of a false belief.
Fallacies [Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
Rhetoric - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Painting depicting a lecture in a knight academy, painted by Pieter Isaacsz or Reinhold Timm for Rosenborg Castle as part of a series of seven paintings depicting the seven independent arts. This painting illustrates rhetorics Rhetoric is the art of discourse , an art that aims to improve the facility of speakers or writers who attempt to inform, persuade, or motivate particular audiences in specific situations. [ 1 ] As a subject of formal study and a productive civic practice, rhetoric has played a central role in the Western tradition. [ 2 ] Its best known definition comes from Aristotle, who considers it a counterpart of both logic and politics, and calls it "the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion." [ 3 ] Rhetorics typically provide heuristics for understanding, discovering, and developing arguments for particular situations, such as Aristotle's three persuasive audience appeals, logos , pathos , and ethos .Un article de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre. La Dialectique éristique (en allemand: Die Kunst, Recht zu behalten ) est une œuvre du philosophe Arthur Schopenhauer . Rédigée vers 1830 - 1831 et publiée en 1864 , elle est parfois éditée en France sous le titre L'Art d'avoir toujours raison . De façon à la fois sarcastique et pragmatique , Schopenhauer y expose une série de stratagèmes permettant de l'emporter lors de controverses, indépendamment de la vérité du point de vue que l'on soutient. « La dialectique éristique est l' art de la controverse. » Cet art repose sur la distinction entre la vérité objective d'une proposition et l'apparence de vérité que cette proposition peut prendre aux yeux des disputeurs et des auditeurs.
La Dialectique éristique - Wikipédia
Un article de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre. Un sophisme , ou argument à logique fallacieuse pour duper volontairement , est un raisonnement qui cherche à apparaître comme rigoureux mais qui en réalité n'est pas valide au sens de la logique (quand bien même sa conclusion serait pourtant vraie ). À l'inverse du paralogisme qui est une erreur involontaire dans un raisonnement, le sophisme est fallacieux : il est prononcé avec l'intention de tromper l'auditoire afin, par exemple, de prendre l'avantage dans une discussion. Souvent, les sophismes prennent l'apparence d'un syllogisme (qui repose sur des prémisses insuffisantes ou non- pertinentes ou qui procède par enthymème , etc.).