Get flash to fully experience Pearltrees
Online advocates, fresh off their victory against the Stop Online Piracy Act, are now gearing up to oppose CISPA because of the disastrous effect the bill could have for private information on the internet. The bill’s opponents argue that it goes too far in the name of cybersecurity, endangering citizens’ personal online information by giving the government access to anything from users’ private emails to their browsing history. As the fight in the Senate begins, here is everything you need to know about CISPA: CISPA’s broad language will likely give the government access to anyone’s personal information with few privacy protections : CISPA allows the government access to any “information pertaining directly to a vulnerability of, or threat to, a system or network of a government or private entity.” There is little indication of what this information could include, and what it means to be ‘pertinent’ to cyber security.
<img class="size-large wp-image-2828 aligncenter" title="Capitalism-works-for-me-Lambert" alt="Capitalism Works For Me! True/False photo" src="http://visitsteve.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Capitalism-works-for-me-Lambert-785x523.jpg" width="765" /> Capitalism Works For Me! True/False 9 ft x 20 ft x 7 ft Aluminum and electrical Images Exhibition/Tour:
A growing body of psychology research shows that incompetence deprives people of the ability to recognize their own incompetence. To put it bluntly, dumb people are too dumb to know it. Similarly, unfunny people don't have a good enough sense of humor to tell. This disconnect may be responsible for many of society's problems.
The democratic process relies on the assumption that citizens (the majority of them, at least) can recognize the best political candidate , or best policy idea, when they see it. But a growing body of research has revealed an unfortunate aspect of the human psyche that would seem to disprove this notion, and imply instead that democratic elections produce mediocre leadership and policies. The research, led by David Dunning , a psychologist at Cornell University , shows that incompetent people are inherently unable to judge the competence of other people, or the quality of those people's ideas. For example, if people lack expertise on tax reform, it is very difficult for them to identify the candidates who are actual experts. They simply lack the mental tools needed to make meaningful judgments.