Warning: Perfect storm conditions now in place for Big Government to allow (or even stage) terrorism attacks in America. (NaturalNews) The article which originally appeared here has been removed because it is no longer aligned with the science-based investigative mission of Natural News.
In late 2013 / early 2014, Mike Adams (the Health Ranger), editor of Natural News, transitioned from outspoken activist to environmental scientist. He now runs the Natural News Forensic Food Lab, conducting world-class food science research and publishing scientific papers on food contaminants and nutritional analytics. Through scientific investigation powered by university-level analytical instrumentation, Adams found that, much like the majority of the population, he had been suffering over the past several years from chronic exposure to cumulative toxic elements found in the food supply, including in many organics and "superfoods.
" Notably, Adams found that exposure to toxic elements in foods altered his mindset, outlook on life and degree of happiness in the world. "Everything is at stake. . • Scientific papers.
Can Government's Finances Be Compared to a Household's? - Robert P. Murphy. Politicians often try to empathize with struggling Americans by promising to cut government spending, "just like regular households in tough times.
" This simile evokes different reactions depending on one's economic views. Keynesians think it's reckless, proponents of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) think it's absurd, and Rothbardians think it's correct as far as it goes, but it falsely equates tax revenues to an honest living. In this context, I was amazed to read a CNBC article earlier this week arguing that households were no role models for the politicians! It's worth going through a comparison to clarify the important issues.
Households a Bad Role Model for Government? The article (which originally ran on Reuters) sets the stage: Republicans, claiming revulsion over the U.S. government's $14.3 trillion in debt, say Washington needs to take a hard look at its finances and balance the books like the typical American family. " As we'll see, these statistics miss the point of the comparison. Arthur Brooks: The Debt Ceiling and the Pursuit of Happiness. Raw Milk Unfreedom and FDA Propaganda. On the raw milk front, Dairyherd.com has some interesting survey results on comparative raw milk regulations on a state-by-state basis.
To summarize, thirty states allow consumers to transact with raw milk producers while twenty states prohibit that act of freedom. And don’t forget that federal laws prevent the sale of any raw milk, from anywhere, over state lines. The fed’s response to the good white stuff moving over state lines is sending in armed soldiers in full battle gear to destroy the enemy.
Thirteen mini-regimes in the US of A allow the sale of raw milk on the farm where where it was produced, while four of those thirteen only allow “incidental occurrences,” which, of course, cannot be defined. But arbitrary laws with a host of potential interpretations is how the feds are able to use arbitrary rule interpretations to seize product and regulate small producers out of business. Meanwhile, the FDA is going after Tucker Adkins Dairy of South Carolina like gangbusters.