background preloader

Whole Brain Teaching

Facebook Twitter

Whole Brain Teaching is a Kinesthetic Teaching style in which many teachers follow. Its main "teaching" aspect is to do these four steps:

1. Attention getter,
2. Have student repeat what you say OR just listen,
3. Say a small 1-3 sentence lesson,
4.

Have students repeat to a classmate.

In this, it is called "direct instruction and Collaborative learning" yet where does it fall on Bloom's Taxonomy? It says it engages all students but where are the logical thinkers getting their learning by repeating? Look at Gardner's Multiple Intelligences.

For me WBT has great tools but it's not as scientific as it is made out to be (brain wise) and there are still many, many flaws. Don't take it as a religion in your classroom, simply a quick, simple tool for basic recall. Learning styles the four modalities. Whole-Brain Teaching. Random Picker. PPP: Child Growth & Development | Brain Development | Brain cells connect. When babies are born, their brains are ready to learn. Even newborns can understand some things about objects and their relationship to each other. The brain organizes what the child experiences into groups.

As a childcare provider, you give children chances to touch, taste, see, hear, and smell all they can. This helps them to learn about the world around them. As children learn, their brains grow. Children are born with all of the brain cells they’re going to have As babies grow, they learn many things, but they do not get new brain cells. When used, brain cells connect Brain cells are not much good if they are not connected with each other. The children in your care are always having experiences that help their brains to make strong connections. The stories of two chidren can explain the idea of the brain making connections. Giulia, on the other hand, lives in Italy. Some connections break down When connections are not used, they get weaker.

Nature vs. nurture. Cooperative and Collaborative Learning: Explanation. What are cooperative and collaborative learning? Collaborative learning is a method of teaching and learning in which students team together to explore a significant question or create a meaningful project. A group of students discussing a lecture or students from different schools working together over the Internet on a shared assignment are both examples of collaborative learning. Cooperative learning, which will be the primary focus of this workshop, is a specific kind of collaborative learning.

In cooperative learning, students work together in small groups on a structured activity. They are individually accountable for their work, and the work of the group as a whole is also assessed. In small groups, students can share strengths and also develop their weaker skills. In order to create an environment in which cooperative learning can take place, three things are necessary.

Also, in cooperative learning small groups provide a place where: THE BRAIN FROM TOP TO BOTTOM. Ing Methods | Teaching Styles. The term Teaching method refers to the general principles, pedagogy and management strategies used for classroom instruction. Your choice of teaching method depends on what fits you — your educational philosophy, classroom demographic, subject area(s) and school mission statement.

Teaching theories primarily fall into two categories or “approaches” — teacher-centered and student-centered: Teacher-Centered Approach to Learning Teachers are the main authority figure in this model. Student-Centered Approach to Learning While teachers are an authority figure in this model, teachers and students play an equally active role in the learning process. To better understand these approaches, it is important to discuss what is generally understood as the three main teaching styles in educational pedagogy: direct instruction, inquiry-based learning and cooperative learning.

Direct Instruction Inquiry-Based Learning Cooperative Learning. Free 2016 WBT Conferences! Whole Brain Teaching...? - Neuroskeptic. Oh dear. The Kansas City Star asks: Teachers learn ways to keep students’ attention, but are brain claims valid? Probably not. Unless you’re buying a brain scanner or a plush brain, product ‘brain claims’ are generally just marketing patter. But let’s see. When Chris Biffle called out the word “Class!” Wednesday morning at Walsh University, 450 teachers and administrators yelled back, “Yes!”

Whole Brain Teaching reminds me of Brain Gym, a notorious bit of British neuro-nonsense from a few years ago. Class-Yes: Our primary attention-getter activates the prefrontal cortex, often called the CEO of the brain… Little if any learning can take place if the prefrontal cortex is not engaged. while even “mirror neurons” have a role to play: Mirror: Many brain scientists believe that we learn by mirroring the gestures and activities of others.

In fact, why not just activate your entire noggin, pharmacologically? But that’s teaching. Whole Brain Teaching - Guff or Great? In my constant quest for classroom management techniques, I stumbled across Whole Brain Teaching. WBT is a structured classroom management approach which has had great results. Immediate pros of WBT: Structured - The drilling of routines and commands is hugely helpful to students, particularly those in my area of specialisation (pre-school to Grade 3).Energetic - the gestures and sillyness of it keep students engaged, which is very difficult to doFree - The materials (videos, articles and ebooks) are all free. They aren't trying to make money from educators. I was able to legally read their primary manual this weekend. Easy to understand - By this, I mean that the many Youtube videos demonstrating WBT in the classroom are hugely helpful in seeing the techniques work in practice.

Obstacles to using WBT in my placement The biggest one would be my host teacher. Another is that I wanted to incorporate WBT into my research project, which I have to frame around, "How can I...? ". Brain gym. Alternative medicine on the NHS? Ben Goldacre Thursday February 12, 2004 The Guardian · Well, last week’s chemicals with rude names certainly tapped a rich seam.

There are some species names that Carl Linnaeus would have been proud of. So, it’s hard to imagine the story behind how we ended up with a leiodid beetle “Colon rectum”, let alone the scarab “Enema pan”. Linnaeus himself named a pink-flowered butterfly pea “Clitoria mariana”, presumably after a special friend, as well as calling a stinkhorn “Phallus”.

Someone somewhere is a big fan of the Sex Pistols, as well as trilobytes, calling a group of them Arcticalymene viciousi, A rotteni, A jonesi, A cooki & A matlocki, Agra vation (beetle), Lalapa lusa (tiphiid wasp), and back to the 80s with Aha ha (sphecid wasp). · Meanwhile, the Sunday Express continues fearlessly to rewrite the science books. The Official Brain Gym Website. Brain Gym - educational kinesiology.