background preloader

Cómo escribir ensayos y artículos

Facebook Twitter

Tres consejos para detectar imágenes falsas. Desde ayer, lunes, se han difundido por las redes sociales muchas imágenes falsas de ‘Sandy’, algunas muy creíbles como para dudar de estas, pero para detectar estas fotos no solo basta el instinto. Fiona McCann, editora de Storyful, escribió un post con tres consejos para no caer en la trampa. 1. Conoce la historia de la imagen Descarga la imagen sospechosa o copia su URL en el buscador de imágenes de Google. 2. Si te parece conocida, pero no recuerdas dónde la viste, debes visitar TinEye. 3. Si ves que publican una foto sobre ‘Sandy’, por ejemplo, conversa con ese tuitero y pregúntale si le pertenece y que te cuente detalles de cómo captó ese momento.

Para más pautas puedes revisar aquí el proceso de verificación de contenido de Storyful. Research Proposal Guide | Learn how to write a research proposal. Plagiarism. Citing and referencing tutorial, Monash University Library. Writing a research thesis. Writing a research proposal. Purpose of a proposal The purpose of the proposal is to help you (as student) to focus and define your research plans. These plans are not binding, in that they may well change substantially as you progress in the research. However, they are an indication to your faculty of your direction and discipline as a researcher. They also help you to prepare your application to the Ethics Committee. The proposal is expected to: Show that you are engaging in genuine enquiry, finding out about something worthwhile in a particular context;Link your proposed work with the work of others, while proving you are acquainted with major schools of thought relevant to the topic;Establish a particular theoretical orientation;Establish your methodological approach, andShow you have thought about the ethical issues Structure of a proposal A proposal is likely to contain most of the elements listed in the table below, although your supervisor may require the inclusion or omission of parts.

Guidelines on writing a research proposal. By Matthew McGranaghan This is a work in progress, intended to organize my thoughts on the process of formulating a proposal. If you have any thoughts on the contents, or on the notion of making this available to students, please share them with me. Thanks. Introduction This is a guide to writing M.A. research proposals. Proposal Writing Proposal writing is important to your pursuit of a graduate degree. The objective in writing a proposal is to describe what you will do, why it should be done, how you will do it and what you expect will result.

A good thesis proposal hinges on a good idea. Proposals help you estimate the size of a project. Different Theses, Similar Proposals This guide includes an outline that looks like a "fill-in the blanks model" and, while in the abstract all proposals are similar, each proposal will have its own particular variation on the basic theme. Characterizing theses is difficult. In the abstract all proposals are very similar. A Couple of Models for Proposals. PHD Proposal - Nottingham University Business School. A typical research proposal will be somewhere between one and two thousand words.

While we do not insist on a definite format, we encourage students to keep the following in mind: The proposal should begin by explaining the subject area in which the research is to be located, and providing an indication of the key theoretical, policy or empirical debates it plans to address.The proposal should then present a brief review of the literature you plan to contribute to in conducting your own research. You need to demonstrate a familiarity with the relevant academic literature and theories relating to your research proposal, and an awareness of the major lines of argument that have been developed in your chosen research field. You then need to discuss the research questions you plan to address.

Guide index. How to write a research proposal. Personality Test - Keirsey.com *** Keirsey Temperament Sorter II. University | Thompson Writing Program: Writing as a Process. La argumentación. Siempre he sido -habla Mairena a sus alumnos de Retórica- enemigo de lo que hoy llamamos, con expresión tan ambiciosa como absurda, educación física. No hay que educar físicamente a nadie. Os lo dice un profesor de Gimnasia. Para crear hábitos saludables, que nos acompañen toda la vida, no hay peor camino que el de la gimnasia y los deportes que son ejercicios mecanizados, en cierto sentido abstractos, desintegrados, tanto de la vida animal como de la ciudadana. Aun suponiendo que estos ejercicios sean saludables -y es mucho suponer-, nunca han de sernos de gran provecho, porque no es fácil que nos acompañen sino durante algunos años de nuestra efímera existencia.

Www.upf.edu/pdi/dtf/carmen_lopez_ferrero/argument.pdf. IASC: The Hedgehog Review - Volume 14, No. 1 (Spring 2012) - Why Google Isn’t Making Us Stupid…or Smart - Chad Wellmon. The Hedgehog Review: Vol. 14, No. 1 (Spring 2012) Reprinted from The Hedgehog Review 14.1 (Spring 2012). This essay may not be resold, reprinted, or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior written permission. Please contact The Hedgehog Review for further details. Last year The Economist published a special report not on the global financial crisis or the polarization of the American electorate, but on the era of big data. Article after article cited one big number after another to bolster the claim that we live in an age of information superabundance.

The data are impressive: 300 billion emails, 200 million tweets, and 2.5 billion text messages course through our digital networks every day, and, if these numbers were not staggering enough, scientists are reportedly awash in even more information. Some see this as information abundance, others as information overload. Two Narratives Each of these narratives points to real changes in how technology impacts humans.

Endnotes. University | Thompson Writing Program: Handouts and Resources. Whales in the Minnesota River? A Rising Tide of Web Sites That Are Born of Hate. Url Decoder. Home > Research Help > General Research Help Topics > Evaluating Internet Information > Url Decoder Uniform Resource Locators, or URLs, are the Internet addresses that you see on the Location bars at the top or bottom of your Web browser (e.g., Netscape or Internet Explorer). URLs provide a standard format for the transmission and reception of a wide variety of information types. Here is how they are constructed: transfer Every URL must have at least the first two elements shown above (the information directly before and after the //).

Understanding the different elements of URLs will help you know what to expect before you click on a link. When you perform a simple yet elegant click of the mouse, your Web browser goes into high gear. Most servers have a name of some kind. Teaching Web Search Skills: Companion Web Page. Search Engine Showdown: The Users' Guide to Web Searching. Search Engine Advertising. Com: Do more. Ipl2: Information You Can Trust. Class Handouts for Teaching Web Searching-The Library. Weingarten Learning Resources Center. Click here for details The Weingarten Learning Resources Center provides academic support services and programs for undergraduate, graduate, and professional students at the University of Pennsylvania through its two offices.

The Office of Learning Resources (OLR) provides professional instruction in university relevant skills such as academic reading, writing, study strategies, and time management to the Penn student community. The Office of Student Disabilities Services (SDS) provides comprehensive, professional services and programs for students who self-identify with disabilities to ensure equal academic opportunities and participation in University-sponsored programs.

The services and programs of both offices are free and confidential. Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask. 1. What can the URL tell you? Techniques for Web Evaluation : 1. Before you leave the list of search results -- before you click and get interested in anything written on the page -- glean all you can from the URLs of each page. 2. 2. 1. INSTRUCTIONS for Truncating back a URL: In the top Location Box, delete the end characters of the URL stopping just before each / (leave the slash). Continue this process, one slash (/) at a time, until you reach the first single / which is preceded by the domain name portion. 3. Check the date on all the pages on the site. 3. 1. What kinds of publications or sites are they? Are they real? 3. Expect a journal article, newspaper article, and some other publications that are recent to come from the original publisher IF the publication is available on the web.

Look at the bottom of such articles for copyright information or permissions to reproduce. 4. 1. A. Type or paste the URL into alexa.com's search box. B. 1. 2. 5. 1. 2. WHY? Practical Steps in Evaluating Internet Resources - Evaluating Information Found on the Internet - Library Guides at Johns Hopkins University. Distinguishing Propaganda and Misinformation - Evaluating Information Found on the Internet - Library Guides at Johns Hopkins University. "Nobody's perfect" is an excellent rule of thumb in most cases but a bad omen when you're looking for information on the no-editorial-control Internet. Misinformation differs from propaganda in that it always refers to something which is not true. It differs from disinformation in that it is "intention neutral": it isn't deliberate, it's just wrong or mistaken. "It's going to require numerous IRA agents.

" -- George W. Bush commenting on Al Gore's tax plan, which he felt would lead to a larger Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and probably not a larger Irish Republican Army (IRA), in a campaign speech given at Greensboro, N.C., Oct. 10, 2000 (Read the Salon archive of "Bushisms") One of the most popular forms of misinformation on the Internet, especially e-mail, is the passing along of urban legends.

Urban legends are fabricated or untrue stories that are passed along by sincere people who believe them...and feel the need to "inform" others. Urban legends, unlike Mr. Items to Consider - Evaluating Information Found on the Internet - Library Guides at Johns Hopkins University. Home - Evaluating Information Found on the Internet - Library Guides at Johns Hopkins University. The World Wide Web offers information and data from all over the world. Because so much information is available, and because that information can appear to be fairly “anonymous”, it is necessary to develop skills to evaluate what you find.

When you use a research or academic library, the books, journals and other resources have already been evaluated by scholars, publishers and librarians. Every resource you find has been evaluated in one way or another before you ever see it. When you are using the World Wide Web, none of this applies. There are no filters. Because anyone can write a Web page, documents of the widest range of quality, written by authors of the widest range of authority, are available on an even playing field. Excellent resources reside along side the most dubious. This guide discusses the criteria by which scholars in most fields evaluate print information, and shows how the same criteria can be used to assess information found on the Internet. Www.vpul.upenn.edu/lrc/lr/PDF/primary sources %28W%29.pdf. Peer Review. What Does "Peer Reviewed" or "Refereed" Mean?

Peer Review is a process that journals use to ensure the articles they publish represent the best scholarship currently available. When an article is submitted to a peer reviewed journal, the editors send it out to other scholars in the same field (the author's peers) to get their opinion on the quality of the scholarship, its relevance to the field, its appropriateness for the journal, etc. Publications that don't use peer review (Time, Cosmo, Salon) just rely on the judgement of the editors whether an article is up to snuff or not. That's why you can't count on them for solid, scientific scholarship. Note:This is an entirely different concept from "Review Articles. " How do I know if a journal is peer reviewed? Usually, you can tell just by looking.

They even use a cute little referee's jersey icon: Test these periodicals in Ulrichs: Advances in Dental Research Clinical Anatomy Molecular Cancer Research Journal of Clinical Electrophysiology. Distinguishing Scholarly Journals from Other Periodicals | olinuris.library.cornell.edu. University | Thompson Writing Program: Working with Sources. A Touchy Topic: Plagiarism | DukeWrites. As the semester comes to a close, many students feel pressed for time and are overwhelmed by exam preparation and writing their final projects or essays. In students’ frenzy of writing those last essays, the writers may fail to cite sources or may cite them improperly. Doing this, however, may be grounds for being accused of plagiarism. Plagiarism is not defined by intent, so students may commit plagiarism out of sloppiness rather than an attempt to cheat.

If you have any questions about proper citation practices, take a few moments to review an online resource from the Duke Library webpage. Additionally, the Writing Studio has multiple handouts about working with sources that you may find helpful. Like this: Like Loading... Evaluating Sources of Information. College Writing Guide - Patrick Rael. Resumen de políticas de la apa para citas y referencias bibliográficas - Razón y Palabra. En revistas cuya numeración es progresiva en las diferentes ediciones que componen un volumen, se pone solamente el número de este último (en caracteres arábigos): Biltereyst, D. (1992).

Language and culture as ultimate barriers? An analysis of the circulation, consumption and popularity of fiction in small European countries. European Journal of Communication, 7, 517-540. En revistas cuya numeración inicia con la página 1 en cada uno de los números que componen un volumen, agregar el número del ejemplar entre paréntesis después de señalar el volumen: Emery, M. (1989). En revistas donde no se señala el volumen, pero sí el número del ejemplar, poner éste entre paréntesis: Pérez, M. (1997). En ediciones dobles de revistas sin volumen seguir el siguiente ejemplo: Trejo Delarbre, R. (1995/96). Tesis No publicada: Byrd, A. (1996). Revistas no académicas y de divulgación Si se señala el autor del artículo, seguir este ejemplo: Carro, N. (1991, mayo). 1990: un año de cine.

González, L. (1997). Rules for Writers with Tabs with 2009 MLA and 2010 APA Updates - Diana Hacker. George Orwell’s 5 Rules for Effective Writing. In our society, the study of language and literature is the domain of poets, novelists, and literary critics. Language is considered a decorative art, fit for entertainment and culture, but practically useless in comparison to the concrete sciences. Just look at the value of a college degree in English versus one in computer science or accounting. But is this an accurate assessment of value? Language is the primary conductor between your brain and the minds of your audience. Ineffective language weakens and distorts ideas. If you want to be understood, if you want your ideas to spread, using effective language must be your top priority.In the modern world of business and politics this is hardly ever the case.

This is hardly a recent problem, and as George Orwell wrote in his 1946 essay, Politics and the English Language, the condition is curable. 1. This sounds easy, but in practice is incredibly difficult. For this exact reason they must be avoided. 2. Poor Faulkner. 3. 4. 5. 6. Rules for Writers 6e.