17 EVIDENCES AGAINST EVOLUTION. Evidence against Evolution (concise and short) What does the theory of evolution need to explain? If biologists propose the evolution of life (by natural processes and mutations) then the scientific community (scientists who study cosmology and abiogenesis) need to be able to explain how the raw materials (the earth, the sun and the first cell) essential for the evolution of life came into being. If you have no sun, earth or first cell we can have no evolution of life. In the evolutionist framework, the sun, the earth and the first cell came about by random, mindless, blind and unguided processes. Random, mindless, blind and unguided processes never achieve anything. In natural selection, the environment affects the gene frequency in a population.
Evolution (which is mindless and blind) will never achieve anything. Read our answer to the question: "Does evolution of life in reality have anything more than just ‘sheer higgledy-piggledy luck’? " EVIDENCE 1: The universe could NOT have created itself nor has it always existed a. Dr. B. C.S. The Scientific Case Against Evolution. By Henry M. Morris, Ph.D. Belief in evolution is a remarkable phenomenon. It is a belief passionately defended by the scientific establishment, despite the lack of any observable scientific evidence for macroevolution (that is, evolution from one distinct kind of organism into another). This odd situation is briefly documented here by citing recent statements from leading evolutionists admitting their lack of proof.
These statements inadvertently show that evolution on any significant scale does not occur at present, and never happened in the past, and could never happen at all. Evolution Is Not Happening Now First of all, the lack of a case for evolution is clear from the fact that no one has ever seen it happen. Evolutionary geneticists have often experimented on fruit flies and other rapidly reproducing species to induce mutational changes hoping they would lead to new and better species, but these have all failed to accomplish their goal. Evolution Never Happened in the Past.
The Scientific Case Against Evolution. By Robert Locke I AM NOT A CREATIONIST, and must confess that until recently, I treated people who questioned evolution with polite dismissal. But there has recently emerged a major trend in biology that has been suppressed in the mainstream media: evolution is in trouble. More importantly, this has absolutely nothing to do with religion but is due to the fact that the ongoing growth of biological knowledge keeps producing facts that contradict rather than confirm evolution.
These two books—Michael Denton's Evolution: A Theory in Crisis and Michael J. Behe's Darwin's Black Box —describe this phenomenon. The first surprising thing Denton points out is that there has always been a dissident faction of highly distinguished scientists, of impeccable credentials and no religious motivations, who have declined to concede that evolution has been proved. The first big problem with evolution is that the fossil record increasingly does not, honestly viewed, support it, a fact that famous Prof. Evidence Against Evolution. Is there any solid evidence against evolution? Yes, there is solid evidence against evolution.
In fact, no solid evidence exists that supports evolution -- that is, macroevolution. Macroevolution claims that all life forms come from an original life form which was generated from non-living matter. Evidence Against Evolution: Apparent Design: All life appears to be designed, and evolutionists have failed to adequately explain why. This article is also available in Spanish. Like this information?