Sw2022_paper3. Technology | Berners-Lee on the read/write web. In August 1991, Sir Tim Berners-Lee created the first website. Fourteen years on, he tells BBC Newsnight's Mark Lawson how blogging is closer to his original idea about a read/write web. Mark Lawson: Because of your invention, I was able to look up every article written by or about you quickly and easily. But at the same time, I was sent several unsolicited links to porn sites. I have to accept that someone in Mexico may have stolen my identity and now be using it. Tim Berners-Lee: That's an interesting question that you ask, as though it's a yes or no answer.
I feel that we need to individually work on putting good things on it, finding ways to protect ourselves from accidentally finding the bad stuff, and that at the end of the day, a lot of the problems of bad information out there, things that you don't like, are problems with humanity. This is humanity which is communicating over the web, just as it's communicating over so many other different media. Towards a rewritable web. Exploring the Read/Write Web | ASK. The World Wide Web is a vast and growing network of interconnected "spaces" called information resources. There are spaces for and about anything imaginable. A space may be something as simple as a Web page document containing some text or a website containing many individual Web pages. Various types of documents and files can be linked or embedded using the "Web" including: text, images, audio, video, animation, and other multimedia. In this sense it’s a highly creative and collaborative medium.
This Web of hypertext linked documents is accessed via the Internet using a Web browser such as Windows Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Google Chrome, or Opera. The Internet is a global computer network and the Web is a part of the Internet that enables access to information on the network. Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web, envisioned a collaborative medium and a place where we could all meet and read and write.
User Generated Content Open Source Open Content. We the Media - 2. The Read-Write Web (by Dan Gillmor) Technology that Makes We the Media Possible I still remember the moment I saw a big piece of the future. It was mid-1999, and Dave Winer, founder of UserLand Software, had called to say there was something I had to see. He showed me a web page. I don’t remember what the page contained except for one button. It said, “Edit This Page”—and, for me, nothing was ever the same again. I clicked the button. Winer’s company was a leader in a move that brought back to life the promise, too long unmet, that Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the Web, had wanted from the start. Writing on the Net wasn’t entirely new, of course. What Winer and the early blog pioneers had created was a breakthrough.
Thus, the read/write Web was truly born again. About a year and a half later, on November 8, 2000, I was sitting at my desk at the University of Hong Kong where I teach part-time each fall. U.S. elections muddle that left Americans unsure for weeks who their next president would be. It boils down to this. Weblogs. La démocratie Internet selon Dominique Cardon. Dans son dernier ouvrage, Dominique Cardon analyse la forme politique qui se dégage d'Internet. Le réseau ne permet pas seulement de communiquer davantage, il est la source d'un élargissement de l'espace public qui transforme la nature même de la démocratie. Sociologue au Laboratoire des usages d’Orange Labs et chercheur associé au Centre d’études des mouvements sociaux (EHESS), Dominique Cardon étudie attentivement les transformations de l’espace public résultant de la massification de l’usage des nouvelles technologies.
Dans son dernier ouvrage, “La démocratie Internet, Promesses et limites”, il revient sur l’immense laboratoire politique à ciel ouvert que constitue Internet. De Perry Barlow à Wikipedia en passant par le fameux Code Is Law de Lawrence Lessig, le chercheur livre une analyse des principes fondamentaux de ce qu’il appelle “La démocratie Internet” et de ses acteurs: > La suite sur la Vie des Idées Crédits photos CC FlickR par Gunthert, ElDave. Atelier 4 : Coproduire l’information journaliste-citoyen | 4M le blog. Pour cet atelier, qui se tient ce jeudi, de 12h15 à 13h, Bernard Paul-Alexis (rédactrice en chef adjointe de France 3 Languedoc-Roussillon) accueille : - Julien Pain, rédacteur en chef adjoint à France 24 / France- Sylvain Lapoix, journaliste à OWNI.fr / France 12h25 - Bonjour à tous. Bienvenue à l’atelier Coproduire l’information journaliste-citoyen. 12h26 - Julien Pain explique que les révolutions arabes ont joué un rôle dans le développement du journalisme-citoyen.
“A mon arrivée à France 24, j’avais demandé de publier les vidéos et photos faites par des amateurs avec des portables pourris. On a bien rigolé. Mais la révolution tunisienne m’a donné raison.” 12h29 - Cette nouvelle méthode de travailler a fondamentalement changé les méthodes de travail des médias, selon Julien Pain. 12h31 - Sylvain Lapoix : “Quand j’ai commencé à travailler dans le journal internet, personne n’y croyait.” Début des questions des spectateurs. 12h55 - “Jusqu’où va la protection du journaliste citoyen ?” Art_phasc. Web 2.0. November 2005 Does "Web 2.0" mean anything? Till recently I thought it didn't, but the truth turns out to be more complicated. Originally, yes, it was meaningless. Now it seems to have acquired a meaning. And yet those who dislike the term are probably right, because if it means what I think it does, we don't need it.
I first heard the phrase "Web 2.0" in the name of the Web 2.0 conference in 2004. At the time it was supposed to mean using "the web as a platform," which I took to refer to web-based applications. [1] So I was surprised at a conference this summer when Tim O'Reilly led a session intended to figure out a definition of "Web 2.0. " Origins Tim says the phrase "Web 2.0" first arose in "a brainstorming session between O'Reilly and Medialive International.
" I don't think there was any deliberate plan to suggest there was a new version of the web. And they were right. The story about "Web 2.0" meaning the web as a platform didn't live much past the first conference. Well, no. 1. 2. Web 2.0 : mythes et réalités. Le Web 2.0 représente une avancée dans l'utilisation des technologies sur le Web. Essayons de démêler la réalité des mythes qui accompagnent le dernier sujet à la mode. Eric van der Vlist, Dyomedea (vdv@dyomedea.com).vendredi 2 décembre 2005 Table des matières Note Définition Volet technique Applications de bureau Volet social L'autre définition Écueils techniques Écueils ergonomiques Développement Modèle économique L'ère du data lock in Mais encore?
Références Sur le web Et sur XMLfr Note J'ai utilisé une version préliminaire de cet article comme trame de mon intervention du 1er décembre 2005 à sparklingPoint. La version qui est publiée ici a été très largement enrichie, dans un esprit très « Web 2.0 », des commentaires recueillis à l'issue de cette présentation ainsi que de ceux exprimés par l'équipe de rédaction de XMLfr. Cette intervention a été complétée, le 30 novembre 2006, par une seconde intervention à sparklingPoint qui a donné lieu à un article intitulé « Web 2.0 : risques et perspectives ».