Microsoft. SSH. Mount Network File systems (NFS,Samba) in Ubuntu -- Debian Admin. Introduction Network File System (NFS), a protocol originally developed by Sun Microsystems in 1984 and defined in RFCs 1094, 1813, and 3530 (obsoletes 3010) as a distributed file system, allows a user on a client computer to access files over a network as easily as if attached to its local disks. NFS, like many other protocols, builds on the Open Network Computing Remote Procedure Call system (ONC RPC). Samba Samba is a free software re-implementation of SMB/CIFS networking protocol released under the GNU General Public License. As of version 3, Samba not only provides file and print services for various Microsoft Windows clients but can also integrate with a Windows Server domain, either as a Primary Domain Controller (PDC) or as a Domain Member. It can also be part of an Active Directory domain. fstab file looks like below # # /etc/fstab ## <device><mountpoint><filesystemtype><options><dump><fsckorder> none /proc proc defaults /dev/hdb3 none swap sw Mount NFS and smb File systems.
§. Last Updated Expert(s) TCP/UDP: Joe Touch; Eliot Lear, Allison Mankin, Markku Kojo, Kumiko Ono, Martin Stiemerling, Lars Eggert, Alexey Melnikov, Wes Eddy, Alexander Zimmermann, Brian Trammell, and Jana Iyengar SCTP: Allison Mankin and Michael Tuexen DCCP: Eddie Kohler and Yoshifumi Nishida Reference Note Service names and port numbers are used to distinguish between different services that run over transport protocols such as TCP, UDP, DCCP, and SCTP.
Available Formats Plain text. Run CMD.exe as Local System Account. I’m currently running Vista and I would like to manually complete the same operations as my Windows Service. Since the Windows Service is running under the Local System Account, I would like to emulate this same behavior. Basically, I would like to run CMD.EXE under the Local System Account. (By the way, it’s fair to question why my Windows Service is running with elevated permissions. Generally, it’s not a good practice, but anyway… Strike 1: I found information online which suggests lauching the CMD.exe using the DOS Task Scheduler AT command.
AT 12:00 /interactive cmd.exe I gave it a shot but I received a Vista warning that “due to security enhancements, this task will run at the time excepted but not interactively.” It turns out that this approach will work for XP, 2000 and Server 2003 but due to session 0 isolation Interactive services no longer work on Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008. Strike 2: C:\sc create RunCMDAsLSA binpath= "cmd" type=own type=interactC:\sc start RunCMDAsLSA. Developer web site - Hobbit / Big Brother tools and scripts. Windows XP Security Console. Windows® XP Security ConsoleVersion 1.4 - 10/26/2003Copyright 2003 - Doug Knox Version 2 has been delayed. Please check back for more information as to its release date. NOTE: Due to recent "HACKS" that have been published for version 1.4.3 of the Windows XP Security Console, I will only provide LIMITED support for unlicensed users.
When you're outside of a domain environment, XP has some features missing. XP Home leaves you completely without the Group Policy Editor, while XP Pro lacks the ability to use the Group Policy Editor to selectively apply policies to specific users. Well, that's about to change. Doug's Windows XP Security Console allows you to assign various restrictions to specific users, whether you're running XP Pro or XP Home. Click here for screen shots of the program The unlicensed version will allow you to apply a number of user specific settings, while logged on to that user's Desktop. All but one of the settings that can be changed are "per-user" settings. Release notes: Copy files on your server while preserving permissions. SetACL - Windows permission management. Welcome to Microsoft Discussion Groups.
MyEventlog | Your source for event log monitoring / syslog help, tips, tricks and more! - index. CrossOver Chromium. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4. Firewall Builder. Protect Public Computers with Windows SteadyState, Part 1. If you would like to read the next part in this article series please go to Protect Public Computers with Windows SteadyState, Part 2 Part 1 of this article series will include a short introduction to the possibilities we get with Windows SteadyState (WSS). We will look at the new version compared to older versions, system requirements, Windows Disk Protection (WDP) and how to get started. The next articles will take us a bit further into the layers of this wonderful toolkit. But first the basics must be covered… Shared Access Computers If you have ever managed shared access computers, like computers in schools, public libraries, Internet cafes, kiosk machines, etc, you probably know how hard it is to keep the computers running in the long run, as well as keeping the security level high and up to date, without too much work and “hands-on”.
Well, Microsoft provides a solution for administrators with the above mentioned, very common problems. What’s new? Figure 1 Windows Disk Protection (WDP) Makes any windows "Always On Top" - The Code Project - DLLs. Introduction This is the mixed version tool of "CPushPinButton v1.13 - A Push Pin Implementation", the article by P.J. Naughter and "Iconizer", the article by Bart Gysens. This tool has very much simpler code. I have eliminated most of the complicated stuffs. This tool places a PushPin like button on any windows through system wide hook. Source Source ZIP file includes two projects. WinPinApp - Executable to start the hook.
Additional Note On the WinPinDll project if you define FRAME_CONTROL, this DLL will draw a blank button using DrawFramControl API on all window caption. Execute Place the WinPinApp.Exe and WinPinDll.Dll in to one folder and execute the exe. Tweak your Life. » Blog Archive » Going Green: Utilizing S3 Standby Mode Without Losing Functionality. Security Report: Windows vs Linux | The Register. High performance access to file storage Executive Summary Much ado has been made about whether or not Linux is truly more secure than Windows. We compared Windows vs. Linux by examining the following metrics in the 40 most recent patches/vulnerabilities listed for Microsoft Windows Server 2003 vs.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS v.3: The severity of security vulnerabilities, derived from the following metrics: damage potential (how much damage is possible?) The results were not unexpected. We queried the United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team (CERT) database, and the CERT data confirms our conclusions by a more dramatic margin. Consider also that both the Red Hat and Linux lists include flaws in software that runs on Windows, which means these flaws apply to both Linux and Windows. So why have there been so many credible-sounding claims to the contrary, that Linux is actually less secure than Windows? Busting The Myths Myth: There’s Safety In Small Numbers The evidence begs to differ.
Linux vs. Windows Viruses | The Register. High performance access to file storage Opinion To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it, writes SecurityFocus columnist Scott Granneman. We've all heard it many times when a new Microsoft virus comes out. In fact, I've heard it a couple of times this week already. Someone on a mailing list or discussion forum complains about the latest in a long line of Microsoft email viruses or worms and recommends others consider Mac OS X or Linux as a somewhat safer computing platform. In response, another person named, oh, let's call him "Bill," says, basically, "How ridiculous! Of course, it's not just "regular folks" on mailing lists who share this opinion.
Mr. Sure, there are Linux viruses. "There are about 60,000 viruses known for Windows, 40 or so for the Macintosh, about 5 for commercial Unix versions, and perhaps 40 for Linux. So there are far fewer viruses for Mac OS X and Linux. Why are Linux and Mac OS X safer? Some caveats. Windows Vista Community: Windows Vista Beta 2 Customer Preview Program.