Recognizing tacit knowledge in medical epistemology. Spurious Correlations. Conflicts of interest at Food and Chemical Toxicology and Elsevier. The journal that published Seralini's paper and its publisher are enmeshed in conflicts of interest with industry.
Information has been trickling in that sheds more light on the corporate influence on Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT), the journal that retracted the Seralini study on GM maize and Roundup; its editor, A. Wallace Hayes; the former Monsanto scientist Richard E. Goodman, appointed as FCT's editor for biotech papers; and FCT's publisher, Elsevier.
Elsevier published 6 fake journals. The Atrophy Of Objectivity\n\nIf I were to rate the corruptive tactics performed by big pharmaceutical companies during my intimate experience with them , the frequent and intentional strategy of implementing fabricated and unreliable results of clinical trials performed by others possibly tops the list.
\n\nA list of corruptive tactics by the pharmaceutical industry that sponsors such trials. By this atrophy of the scientific method absent of authenticity that has been known to occur, harm and damage is possibly done to the health of the public. OGM: l'affaire Séralini suite, fin et suite... OGM: l'affaire Séralini suite, fin et suite...
Gilles-Eric SéraliniCoup de théâtre dans l'affaire Séralini : la direction de la revue Food and Chemical Toxicology où l'article de Gilles-Eric Séralini sur un maïs transgénique, les rats et l'herbicide Round-Up avait été publié a décidé de le retirer. De l'effacer de la mémoire de la revue. OGM : l'étude polémique du professeur Séralini désavouée. Falsification, Fabrication, and Plagiarism: The Unholy Trinity of Scientific Writing. Article Outline One of the greatest, and sadly all too common, challenges facing a contemporary medical journal editor is the adjudication of ethical integrity issues.
I had originally presumed that this would be just an occasional role, but it transpires that these problems are quite widespread, ranging from unconscious and unwitting naiveté to the conscious and willful betrayal of scientific trust. As a journal, we have no significant powers of investigation, and determining, often years after publication, what is truth and what is fiction can be impossibly hard.
The International Journal of Radiation Oncology · Biology · Physics (the Red Journal) editorial board wishes to lay down an unambiguous, bright line that distinguishes the acceptable from the unacceptable so that no author can, in retrospect, say they were not warned. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. Summary There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false.
The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of true to no relationships among the relationships probed in each scientific field. In this framework, a research finding is less likely to be true when the studies conducted in a field are smaller; when effect sizes are smaller; when there is a greater number and lesser preselection of tested relationships; where there is greater flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes; when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice; and when more teams are involved in a scientific field in chase of statistical significance.
Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. LA FRAUDE SCIENTIQUE, FLÉAU DE LA LITTÉRATURE BIOMÉDICALE : Sciences et Avenir. Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process. Retraction wars: is science broken? – Jill Neimark. On 5 August 2014, a celebrated Japanese scientist was found dead, hanging by his neck at his workplace, his shoes politely removed and placed on the landing of the stairs.
Yoshiki Sasai, 52, was a legendary stem-cell expert, widely regarded as an exceptional scientist, who worked at the RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology in Kobe. ICD-10 Version:2016. Advanced search lets you search selected properties of the classification.
You could search all properties or a selected subset only First, you need to provide keywords in the Search Text field then check the properties that you'd like to include in the search. The system will search for the keywords in the properties that you've checked and rank the results similar to a search engine The results will be displayed in the Search Results pane. If the search query hits more than 200 results, then only the top 200 will be displayed.
If you provide more than one keyword, the system will search for items that have all the keywords. Wildcards: You may also use wildcard character * . see examples below. OR operator : It's possible to have the results that have either one or another keyword. KMLE 의학 검색 엔진 - 의학사전, 의학용어, 의학약어, 의학논문, 약품/의약품 검색. National Library of Medicine - National Institutes of Health. PhysioNet. iHOP - Information Hyperlinked over Proteins. FABLE - Fast Automated Biomedical Literature Extraction. Chilibot: finding gene and protein relationships from MEDLINE - a text mining approach. PubGene. Transinsight's semantic search for the life sciences. Clinical Medicine NetPrints(TM) Medical Search Engine - OmniMedicalSearch.com. GeneCards - Human Genes.
Database of Genomic Variants. Genome browser 72: Homo sapiens - Description. Home - OMIM - NCBI. Home - dbGaP - NCBI. The Human Protein Atlas. Human - UCSC Genome Browser v284. Map: explore the human disease network. Dataset, interactive map and printable poster of gene-disease relationships. Curious about the Diseasome map?
Here are some answers to the most common questions asked: I. Drawing the map. Graphical network of the top 20 diseases. MalaCards - human disease database. Human disease database. MalaCards is an integrated searchable database of human maladies and their annotations, modeled on the architecture and richness of the popular GeneCards database of human genes.
MalaCards leverages GeneCards and GeneDecks and their associated genes. Each "card" contains a variety of detailed sections. For example, see our Sample Malady. Orphanet. WebMD - Better information. Better health. Bibliothèque Interuniversitaire de Santé, Paris. MINERVA Revue d'Evidence-Based Medicine > Homepagina. NHS Evidence - Search Engine for Evidence in Health and Social Care. Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health.
Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. Cochrane - Accueil. Trip Database. Banque de données en santé publique. Le MeSH bilingue anglais - français. Quertle® - Intelligent semantic queries of MEDLINE (PubMed) and the biomedical literature. PubMed - Home. National Center for Biotechnology Information. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Sample References.
The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors offers guidance to authors in its publication Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (ICMJE Recommendations), which was formerly the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts.
The recommended style for references is based on the National Information Standards Organization NISO Z39.29-2005 (R2010) Bibliographic References as adapted by the National Library of Medicine for its databases. Details are in Citing Medicine. (Note Appendix F which covers how citations in MEDLINE/PubMed differ from the advice in Citing Medicine.) Sample references typically used by authors of journal articles are provided below. Articles in Journals (see also #36. 1. List the first six authors followed by et al. SUMSearch 2. NLM Gateway Search. Main View : Deep Web Medical Search. PasseportSanté.net : Information Santé - Alimentation - Exercice - Gestion du stress. Biomedical Search - Medical Research and Health Resources. Index of /Digimed.ir. UpToMed.ir. L'encyclopédie médicale dans un langage accessible à tous. - Vulgaris-Médical.