
wikipedia 1
Get flash to fully experience Pearltrees
collaboration
ufos
Traces of Shooter%u2019s Online Life Begin to Vanish - The Lede Blog - NYTimes.com
Wikipedians Wrestle Over John Edwards Love-Child Rumor | Threat Level from Wired.com
Wikipedia Tries Approval System to Reduce Vandalism on Pages - Bits - Technology - New York Times Blog
Wikipedia is considering a basic change to its editing philosophy to cut down on vandalism.Computerworld - Wikipedia breeds 'unwitting trust' says IT professor
If you are faced with the prospect of having brain surgery who would you rather it be performed by - a surgeon trained at medical school or someone who has read Wikipedia?IT IS the biggest encyclopedia in history and the most successful example of “user-generated content” on the internet, with over 9m articles in 250 languages contributed by volunteers collaborating online.
The battle for Wikipedia's soul | Economist.com
SOURCE: Wikipedia Students and teachers alike must understand how systems of knowledge creation and archivization are changing. Encyclopedias are no longer static collections of facts and figures; they are living entities.
Wikipedia and the New Curriculum
Digg, Wikipedia, and the myth of Web 2.0 democracy. - By Chris Wilson - Slate Magazine
Micro Persuasion: Newsrooms Struggle with Wikipedia Citations
The Clip Report: An eBook on the Future of MediaThe Right Way To Fix Inaccurate Wikipedia Articles
Suppose your company, boss or political candidate discovers that their Wikipedia article is wrong, or has subtle inaccuracies that nonetheless paint them in an unfavorable light? Most people unfamiliar with how Wikipedia works consider only two solutions: edit the article or sit on their hands. Unfortunately, neither approach typically results in the optimal outcome: a factually accurate profile containing trustworthy information.In the opinions of some Wikipedia members self-published books like Howard Tayler's do not satisfy Wikipedia's notability guideline .
Wikimedia fundraiser highlights webcomic community's frustration with Wikipedia guidelines - Wikinews, the free news source
is not failing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This essay presents arguments to show that the Wikipedia is succeeding in the goal becoming a reputable and reliable encyclopedia .Note: Unless stated otherwise or directly sourced, the statistics used in this essay were collected in February 2007 and may now be out-of-date.
Wikipedia is failing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia, the Vice President of the World Book told us, is now recognized by ten percent of Americans.

