background preloader

Argumentation

Facebook Twitter

10 More Common Faults in Human Thought. Humans This list is a follow up to Top 10 Common Faults in Human Thought.

10 More Common Faults in Human Thought

Thanks for everyone’s comments and feedback; you have inspired this second list! Analyzing Changes in View During Argumentation: A Quest for Method. Volume 2, No. 3, Art. 12 – September 2001 Analyzing Changes in View During Argumentation: A Quest for Method Selma Leitão Abstract: There is an increasing interest among psychologists and educators in articulating argumentation to knowledge building processes that evolve in teaching-learning settings.

Analyzing Changes in View During Argumentation: A Quest for Method

However, a major problem facing researchers in attempting to do so is the lack of analytical instruments with which to approach this issue. In such conditions, it is tempting to look for methods developed in other domains and consider what they can offer. ENG 101 - What is a Counter-Argument. A counter-argument is an argument opposed to your thesis, or part of your thesis.

ENG 101 - What is a Counter-Argument

It expresses the view of a person who disagrees with your position. Content Organization More Information. Formal and Informal Fallacies. By Harvey Bluedorn.

Formal and Informal Fallacies

Copyright 1995. All rights reserved. Logical Fallacies. ISSA - International Society for the Study of Argumentation. List of fallacies. A fallacy is incorrect argument in logic and rhetoric resulting in a lack of validity, or more generally, a lack of soundness.

List of fallacies

Fallacies are either formal fallacies or informal fallacies. Formal fallacies[edit] Main article: Formal fallacy Appeal to probability – is a statement that takes something for granted because it would probably be the case (or might be the case).[2][3]Argument from fallacy – assumes that if an argument for some conclusion is fallacious, then the conclusion is false.Base rate fallacy – making a probability judgment based on conditional probabilities, without taking into account the effect of prior probabilities.[5]Conjunction fallacy – assumption that an outcome simultaneously satisfying multiple conditions is more probable than an outcome satisfying a single one of them.[6]Masked man fallacy (illicit substitution of identicals) – the substitution of identical designators in a true statement can lead to a false one.

Propositional fallacies[edit] Logic in Argumentative Writing. Summary: This resource covers using logic within writing—logical vocabulary, logical fallacies, and other types of logos-based reasoning.

Logic in Argumentative Writing

Contributors:Ryan Weber, Allen BrizeeLast Edited: 2013-03-11 10:08:50. Logical Fallacies and How to Spot Them. Logical Fallacies and How to Spot Them In the Evolution vs.

Logical Fallacies and How to Spot Them

Creationism debate, it is important to be able to spot all the logical fallacies that Creationists tend to throw around. This essay covers many bare essentials of logical thinking, as well as ways to critically evaluate an argument. The logical fallacies listed here are the ones most often used by Creationists, although Creationists have, to date, used almost every single logical fallacy in existence to "prove" their case. Each fallacy will have its own little paragraph, describing it, why it is fallacious and how to counter it. Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate. Contents: Introduction This is a guide to using logical fallacies in debate.

Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate

And when I say "using," I don't mean just pointing them out when opposing debaters commit them -- I mean deliberately committing them oneself, or finding ways to transform fallacious arguments into perfectly good ones. Logical Fallacies Handlist. Master List of Logical Fallacies. A Priori Argument: Also, Rationalization; Proof Texting.

Master List of Logical Fallacies

A corrupt argument from logos, starting with a given, pre-set belief, dogma, doctrine, scripture verse, "fact" or conclusion and then searching for any reasonable or reasonable-sounding argument to rationalize, defend or justify it. Certain ideologues and religious fundamentalists are proud to use this fallacy as their primary method of "reasoning" and some are even honest enough to say so.

Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) Untitled.