background preloader

Philosophy+technology

Facebook Twitter

Philosophy 1

Philosophy 2. Technique, monde ... - Google Recherche de Livres. Del.icio.us/login. Computing and Moral Responsibility. First published Wed Jul 18, 2012 Traditionally philosophical discussions on moral responsibility have focused on the human components in moral action. Accounts of how to ascribe moral responsibility usually describe human agents performing actions that have well-defined, direct consequences. In today's increasingly technological society, however, human activity cannot be properly understood without making reference to technological artifacts, which complicates the ascription of moral responsibility (Jonas 1984; Waelbers 2009).[1] As we interact with and through these artifacts, they affect the decisions that we make and how we make them (Latour 1992).

They persuade, facilitate and enable particular human cognitive processes, actions or attitudes, while constraining, discouraging and inhibiting others. Computing presents a particular case for understanding the role of technology in moral responsibility. 1. Moral responsibility is about human action and its consequences. 1.3 Free to act. 4S Annual Meeting. The Society for Social Studies of Science (4S) is a nonprofit, professional association. It was founded in 1975 and now has an international membership of over 1200. The main purpose of 4S is to bring together those interested in understanding science, technology, and medicine, including the way they develop and interact with their social contexts.

Members Site Presidents Message Digital Publications, 4S Reports and Position Statements Committee, and more. Primer on Latin American STS Valuable background for 4S-ers heading south in 2014. Submit abstracts for Buenos Aires Individual and session submissions open now. ISSC Forum 2015 Watch for news about 4S participation in the International Social Science Council, the World Social Science Forum, 2015 in South Africa. Bernard Stiegler — Ars Industrialis. CTheory.net. Editors' Note: On the sad occasion of Gilles Deleuze's death, we are publishing the following two meditations. Certainly one of the major theorists of the 20th century, Deleuze died at the very moment that his thought formed one of the leading intellectual vectors of our times. An untimely death in an untimely century.

Arthur Kroker I. White Walls/Black Holes This is because the two groups (the schiz and the paranoiac) are like determinism and freedom in Kant's philosophy: they indeed have the same "object" - and social production is never anything more than desiring-production and vice-versa - but they don't share the same law, the same regime. - Deleuze and Guattari, Anti-Oedipus Machines everywhere. How could it be otherwise? And not uncritical texts, but just the opposite. In this confession, the dark shadow of Nietzsche is everywhere. II. Anyway, Why fear? And it is to recognize as well the deep affinity between feminism and the rhizomatic perspective of Deleuze and Guattari. Reverse Transcript - Hyperlink to Donna Haraway. Theory of Technology. Andrew Feenberg's Home Page.